View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
58% population decrease e0 164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
KCl tended to decrease yield in all cultivars.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In KCl treatment yield tended to decrease in all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield tended to decrease with later planting dates.
later planting dates e0 Not reported Taxon Setting
Verbatim
e0 “yield tended to decrease with later planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–63 t0 “Short Staple Planting Dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
disease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Models predicted above average July heat units would decrease corn yield .
above average heat units e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “above average heat units would decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1478 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.
Verbatim
e0 “wheat yield would decrease across locations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
This decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear largely caused the decrease in maize grain yield .
decrease in grain yield e4 largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear e4 Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
tillering stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yield s as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.
vegetables, and ornamentals e1 calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible e0 polynomial model e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 e1 “various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maintaining a high proportion of double-flowered plants may decrease seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining a high percentage of plants with double-flowered capitula may decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–933 t0 “Zinnia
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Selection for yield could decrease meat and oil content.
meat and oil content e0 Verbatim
e0 “but would decrease meat and oil content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1926 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 Other claims from this paper (16) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest ethephon may decrease grain yield without lodging.
decrease grain yield e0 in the absence of lodging e0 Verbatim
e0 “may decrease grain yield in the absence of lodging because of its potential deleterious effect on kernel number and growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1830 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.JPG?width=60)
Amaranthus caudatust0
Glycine max
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Oryza sativa
Solanum tuberosum
Zinnia
Arachis hypogaea