View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear was associated with the decrease in grain yield (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001).
Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The cultivar had a significant decrease in grain yield .
Verbatim
e0 “which resulted in a significant decrease in its grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–940 t0 “triticale ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
TaxonMerlot and Cabernet franc t0 Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1712 t0 “Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Disease progress curve area was significantly correlated with sugar beet yield decrease .
Qualifierarea under the disease progress curve values (AUDPC) e0 Settingdisease progress curve e0 Verbatim
e0 “The area under the disease progress curve values (AUDPC) was significantly correlated with yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1349 t0 “sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UA4805 showed a significant yield decrease in 2023 due to stink bug damage.
Interactorstink bug e1 pest Verbatim
e0 “A new soybean cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 e1 “a significant yield decrease in ‘UA4805’ in 2023 due to stink bug damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–664 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The disease led to a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “leads to a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1041 t1 “cherry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 e2 “virulent bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens Conn. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–229 e3 “the incubation period of the disease begins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–743 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated resistant lines had a small but significant yield decrease relative to susceptible lines.
Materialresistant lines e0 Comparatorsusceptible lines e0 Verbatim
e0 “A small but significant decrease in yield was observed for noninoculated resistant lines in contrast to susceptible lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was more significant when weed was in rows of maize, in both seasons.
Treatmentweed in rows of maize e3 Qualifierin both seasons e3 Verbatim
e3 “Yield was significantly affected by the weed position in both seasons and the decrease was more significant in variants with weed in rows of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Oat cultivar Mures achieved 68% of its yield capacity, a significant yield decrease of 947 kg/ha.
Directiondecrease inferred e4 Qualifier68% from its yield capacity e4 Verbatim
e4 “such as the oat cultivar Mures which achieved 68% from its yield capacity, resulting a minus significant yield on 947 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1388 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Across cultivars, salinity-driven seedling leaf-area reduction correlated strongly with field yield decrease (r = 0.99).
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “For all cultivars, a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.99) was established between the influence of salinity on seedling leaf area reduction and on decrease in yield during field culture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1046 t0 “Muskmelon Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–109 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The selection associated decrease s in yield and plant size were strongly correlated.
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Comparatordecrease in plant size e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in yield due to selection showed close association with decrease in plant size ( r = 0.98**, significant at P = 0.01), which probably reduced photosynthetic capacity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1407 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nutsedge density was associated with a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield
TreatmentIncreasing nutsedge density e0 Outcomeseed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus ) density on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–104 e0 “Increasing nutsedge density caused a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–315 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity yield decrease values and salinity threshold values varied significantly between greenhouse crops.
Outcomesalinity yield decrease values and the salinity threshold values e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Data are presented on the salinity yield decrease values and the salinity threshold values, both of which varied significantly between crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–486 t0 “greenhouse crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–38 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The linear pH component showed a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The linear component of pH treatment differences showed a highly significant decrease in yield (p < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–632 e1 “Seed yield s were determined from field‐grown soybeans ( Glycine max L .) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–207 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A combined analysis found that 20 to 30% terminal bud destruction was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield in cotton.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Larvae on Cotton Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 e4 “20 to 30% TBD was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–687 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Unprotected B. campestris had a significant yield decrease .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–827 t0 “RESPONSE OF FOUR BRASSICA SEED CROP SPECIES TO ATTACK BY THE CRUCIFER FLEA BEETLE, PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 e1 “Nevertheless the unprotected B. juncea treatment yield ed as much as the protected; B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease and B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–827 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A significant yield decrease due to fertilizer with the seed was observed in two trials.
TreatmentFertilizer was banded with the seed e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Fertilizer was banded with the seed of corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 e1 “A significant yield decrease due to fertilizer with the seed was observed in two trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–520 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High ambient ozone caused a significant decrease in tomato fruit size over time.
TreatmentHigh ambient ozone e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Reduction of Tomato Fruit Size and Yield by Ozone1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 e2 “High ambient ozone depressed production and caused a significant decrease in fruit size over time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–558 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Diseased lucerne has significantly decrease d dry-weight yield in the second harvest year, often requiring ploughing-in before the third harvest.
Outcomedry‐weight yield e0 Qualifierduring the second harvest year e0 Verbatim
e0 “a significant decrease of dry‐weight yield of diseased lucerne occurs during the second harvest year: this often necessitates the ploughing‐in of badly wilted crops before they reach their third harvest. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1850 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ploughing to 21 and 28 cm significantly decrease d soil bulk density.
Treatment21 and 28 cm. ploughing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Upland Paddy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 e0 “A significant decrease in bulk density was observed with the 21 and 28 cm. ploughing, negatively correlated with dry matter of crop roots and yield of grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–339 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Microelement spray decrease d coffee yield significantly, by up to 39% in 1955
Treatmentmicroelement spray e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Mineral fertilizing for coffee culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 e4 “The microelement spray cured the zinc deficiency symptoms which were evident prior to its application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2002 e5 “but decrease d the yield significantly, the highest decrease being 39% in 1955 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2081 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under some conditions sulphur dioxide significantly increased alfalfa yield .
Treatmentsulphur dioxide e0 Qualifierunder some of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under some of the conditions it brought about significant yield increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–662 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide treatment significantly increased the total sulphur content of alfalfa.
Treatmentsulphur dioxide e1 Outcomeper cent total sulphur e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “treatment with sulphur dioxide brought about significant increases in per cent total sulphur ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1505 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Omitting potassium significantly decrease d potato yield in 1952.
Treatmentelimination of potassium e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In 1952 the elimination of potassium did cause a significant decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1007 t0 “Potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.