View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Future grain yield was projected to decrease .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the grain yield would decrease in future ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1020 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear largely caused the decrease in maize grain yield .
decrease in grain yield e4 largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear e4 Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.
Verbatim
e0 “wheat yield would decrease across locations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
tillering stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 t1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
58% population decrease e0 164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
KCl tended to decrease yield in all cultivars.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In KCl treatment yield tended to decrease in all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 Other claims from this paper (12) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maintaining a high proportion of double-flowered plants may decrease seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining a high percentage of plants with double-flowered capitula may decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–933 t0 “Zinnia
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet had the greatest yield decrease under intercropping.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Pearl millet was the cereal with the greatest decrease in yield when intercropped ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1125 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Models predicted above average July heat units would decrease corn yield .
above average heat units e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “above average heat units would decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1478 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
F4 and F5 mungbean populations showed a slight grain yield decrease .
slight decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “slight decrease in 'grain yield in subsequent populations of F4 and FS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–993 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–34 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
This decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield tended to decrease with later planting dates.
later planting dates e0 Not reported Taxon Setting
Verbatim
e0 “yield tended to decrease with later planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–63 t0 “Short Staple Planting Dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At high populations, the decrease in barley grain yield was accompanied by a comparable decrease in grains per unit area.
high populations e1 number of grains per unit area e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 e1 “a decrease in grain yield at high populations was associated with a comparable decrease in the number of grains per unit area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1397 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Larger fertilizer applications can decrease plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall.
larger applications e0 seasons of poor rainfall e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “larger applications can even decrease the plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2298 e1 “corn acreage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2056 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further decrease in plant spacing in broccoli caused an abrupt reduction in yield .
Further decrease in the space between plants e4 abrupt reduction e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Plant spacing in broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e4 “Further decrease in the space between plants results in an abrupt reduction in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root loss of 50% after 21 weeks did not affect fruit yield , whereas 40% loss within 11 weeks accompanied a 45% yield decrease .
40% loss within 11 weeks of planting e0 Verbatim
t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 e0 “A 50% root loss after 21 weeks did not affect fruit yield s whereas a 40% loss within 11 weeks of planting was reflected by a 45% yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2287–2430 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.
shading the ears e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher manganese and boron concentrations were associated with decrease in barley yield .
manganese and boron coucentrations e0 Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in yield and an increase in spotting were found to be associated with an increase in the manganese and boron coucentrations of the solutions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–487 e1 “Barley plants grown in standard Hoagland solutions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher insecticide rates may decrease soybean yield .
higher rates of application e0 may cause foliage injury e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 e0 “higher rates of application may cause foliage injury to the extent of decreasing yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–260 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil sterilizer treatment considerably decrease d tomato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the effect of the treatment on growth and yield : the latter showed a considerable decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–354 t0 “tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Some nitrogen additions apparently decrease d yield .
addition of nitrogen e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In some cases there was an apparent decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4354–4407 e1 “the addition of nitrogen-whether or not it increased the nitrate reserve-did not result in materially increased yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4234–4352 t0 “Pineapple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When established together, more Holcus growth accompanied an almost equal decrease in barley yield .
start together e0 Verbatim
e0 “Where the crop and the weed start together and so compete on equal terms, any increase of Holcus growth is obtained at the cost of an almost equal falling off in the yield of barley, showing that the respective plant growths are almost complementary. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1867 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem borer is said to reduce rice yield by about ten per cent annually.
Schoenobius Bipunctifer e0 pest Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “stem borer (Schoenobius Bipunctifer) is said to be res- ponsible for the decrease of about ten per cent in the yield every year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–886 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced daily food production in leaves resulted in decrease d orange yield .
decrease in the amount of food made daily in the leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “This decrease in the amount of food made daily in the leaves has resulted in a decrease d yield , as well as in a decrease d growth of the trees. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–577 t0 “orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Daily food production in orange leaves decrease d.
amount of food made daily e0 Verbatim
e0 “This decrease in the amount of food made daily in the leaves has resulted in a decrease d yield , as well as in a decrease d growth of the trees. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–577 t0 “orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.JPG?width=60)
Amaranthus caudatust0
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Glycine max
Zinnia
Cenchrus americanus.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Zea mays subsp. mays
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Solanum lycopersicum
Ananas comosus
Holcus