View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Cover crops showed no increase or a slight decrease in soybean seed yield in 2007 and 2009.
no yield increase or slight yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 2007 and 2009 no yield increase or slight yield decrease was shown by the cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1264 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was simulated to stagnate or decrease .
stagnation or decrements e0 Verbatim
e0 “For spring barley and maize, however, yield stagnation or decrements were simulated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
Spring barley yield was simulated to stagnate or decrease .
stagnation or decrements e0 Verbatim
e0 “For spring barley and maize, however, yield stagnation or decrements were simulated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Across years, basal area increment tended to decrease as yield increased.
basal area increment e0 Verbatim
e0 “as yield increased, basal area increment tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1871 e1 “four almond varieties in a commercial orchard (California, USA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–892 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield enhancement coincided with a relative decrease in oat grain protein content of 11.3 to 12.4%.
Yield enhancement e0 protein content of oat grains e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield enhancement was accompanied by a relative decrease of protein content of oat grains ranging from 11.3 to 12.4 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–955 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
At a high-rainfall site, the corresponding projected early variety yield changes are a 9% decrease and 1% increase.
9% decrease and 1% increase e0 high-rainfall site e0 Verbatim
e0 “at a high-rainfall site, these values would show a 9% decrease and 1% increase, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1252 t0 “Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 e1 “At the low rainfall site, yield reduction for early sown variety would be 14% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1331 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation RCP4.5 projects growing season rainfall decreases of 9%, 15%, and 19% in 2030, 2050, and 2070. Observation RCP4.5 projects temperature rises of 0.7 °C, 1.2 °C, and 1.4 °C in 2030, 2050, and 2070. Observation Under RCP4.5 wheat yield is projected to decrease 9%, 15%, and 19% in 2030, 2050, and 2070. Observation Under RCP8.5 wheat yield is projected to decrease 9%, 18%, and 27% across the three periods. Recommendation Short-season cultivars are projected suitable for low-rainfall environments. Recommendation Long-season cultivars are projected suitable for high-rainfall environments. Observation At a low-rainfall site in 2050 under RCP4.5, early maturing variety yield is projected to fall 11% and 31%. Observation At a low-rainfall site, early-sown variety yield is projected to fall 14%. Observation At a low-rainfall site, late-sown early variety yield is projected to fall 23%. Observation Late-maturing wheat is projected to have much greater yield reduction at the low-rainfall site. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, early-sown early maturing variety yield reduction is projected at 3%. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, late-sown early maturing variety yield reduction is projected at 15%. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, late-maturing wheat yield reduction is projected at 1% with early sowing. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, late-maturing wheat yield reduction is projected at 2% with late sowing. Recommendation The authors conclude changes in agronomic practices can mitigate future climate impacts on wheat yield. Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
PP333 could increase or decrease yield .
increase or decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PP333 applied could lead to plant height reduction, leaf smaller, yield increase or decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1168 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
The mean yield increase or decrease at responsive sites was 400 kg ha −1.
mean yield increase or decrease e0 responsive sites e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mean yield increase or decrease for responsive sites was 400 kg ha −1 . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–914 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying sowing and increasing density changed the yield of Hefeng 50 in an increase-then- decrease trend.
sowing date delayed and density increased e1 increase-and-then-decrease trend e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “New soybean variety Hefeng 50 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 e1 “with the sowing date delayed and density increased,the yield of Hefeng 50 showed increase-and-then- decrease trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–426 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon changed husked yield from an 8% increase to an 18% decrease across rates, timings and seasons.
8% increase in yield to an 18% decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Effects of ethephon on husked yield varied from an 8% increase in yield to an 18% decrease , depending on rate, timing, and season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–711 e1 “sweet corn (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–189 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial inoculation changed maize seedling average yield from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase versus controls.
bacterial inoculation e0 bacterial e0 symbiont 50% decrease to a 70% increase e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro bacterial inoculation on maize seedlings resulted in changes of average yield ranging from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase over controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–487 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result mixed basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude an arsenical herbicide generally increases sicklepod control but may delay cotton maturity and decrease yield .
sicklepod e0 weed addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac e0 potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Where sicklepod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1340 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
In other varieties, a one month yield increase was offset by a decrease in another month.
Verbatim
e0 “in others they occurred in 1 month and were offset by a yield decrease in another ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–796 e1 “54 varieties of ryegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–204 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Compaction from light axle loads can both increase and decrease crop yield , depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation.
increase and decrease e1 depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation e1 Verbatim
t1 “The Effect of Soil Compaction on Crop Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 e1 “This compaction can both increase and decrease crop yield depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–424 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Laurier had the highest disease severity but the smallest grain yield and grain weight decrease .
Disease severity e0 Verbatim
t0 “ORGE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 e0 “Disease severity was highest on Laurier which suffered the least decrease in grain yield and grain weight compared to the checks. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–657 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
A 30% yield increase was associated with a 3% quality decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Yield increases of 30% were associated with a 3% decrease in quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–510 t0 “corn silage production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–157 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional early hybrids showed yield responses ranging from a 37% increase to a 14% decrease after five-leaf defoliation.
a 37%, increase to a 14% decrease e0 Southern Minnesota e1 Verbatim
e0 “Yield responses ranged from a 37%, increase to a 14% decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–773 e1 “Eleven additional early hybrids at one Southern Minnesota location were defoliated at the 5‐leaf stage in 1975. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–710 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical treatments varied widely in phytotoxic reduction of tuber yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The chemicals varied very widely in their effects on scab, and in their phytotoxicity, as measured by decrease in yield of tubers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–454 e1 “potato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–244 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Cincturing vines in one season only increased yield of sultana vines in that season.
vines cinctured in one season only e3 more than offset by a decrease in the following year e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “sultana vines in which single or double cut cincturing every year for seven years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–111 e3 “An increase in yield on vines cinctured in one season only was more than offset by a decrease in the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–648 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Twenty-inch spacing decrease d yield , returns and yellow leaf percentage versus 16 inches.
20-in. spacing e0 yield, crop returns, and percentage of yellow leaf e0 16-in. spacing e0 Verbatim
t0 “CIGAR TOBACCO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 e0 “the 20-in. spacing caused a decrease in yield , crop returns, and percentage of yellow leaf and an increase in weight per leaf and percentage of filler leaf from that obtained with the 16-in. spacing. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–787 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
In one case an increased oil iodine value was associated with decrease d seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “an increase in iodine value was associated with a decrease in seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–271 e1 “flax and safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–85 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Similarly treated plants had the same leaf-area reduction across two years but a much greater net-assimilation decrease in the second year.
reduction of leaf area e0 but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second e0 Verbatim
e0 “similarly treated plants showed the same reduction of leaf area in two successive years, but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1193 e1 “Infection with beet yellows virus depressed the dry‐matter yield of sugar‐beet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Beet yellows infection depressed sugar-beet dry-matter yield by decreasing leaf area and net assimilation rate, without reducing leaf number. Intervention effect End-of-June yellows infection yellowed 30‐50% of leaf area from mid-August; later infection caused less yellowing. Mechanism Yellowing nearly explained the decrease in net assimilation if yellowed leaf parts do not photosynthesize, although similar carbohydrate fluctuations suggest photosynthesis may be little slowed and respiration may instead increase. Intervention effect Late-sown infected plants had a greater leaf-area reduction but a smaller net-assimilation reduction than early-sown plants. Intervention effect Yellows dry-matter losses were mostly in roots, petiole dry weight also decreased, and leaf-lamina dry weight was little affected. Intervention effect Yellows greatly increased reducing sugars and caused smaller sucrose and starch increases in leaf laminae, beginning with etch symptoms; starch effects peaked then while sugar effects increased with yellowing. Intervention effect Yellows reduced leaf-lamina water content, nitrogen content and arealweight ratio. Mechanism The carbohydrate rise could explain the nitrogen-content change but not the other leaf-lamina changes. Intervention effect Yellows did not affect petiole and root water content but increased their nitrogen content. Mechanism Yellows reduced root sucrose content, while decreased root weight accounted for most sugar-yield loss. Intervention effect Beet mosaic infection decreased sugar-beet dry weight only with nitrogenous fertilizer, through reduced leaf area and net assimilation. Intervention effect Mosaic depressed dry weights of leaf lamina, petiole and root. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect leaf-lamina carbohydrate content, water content or arealweight ratio. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect petiole and root water content. Intervention effect Mosaic increased nitrogen content throughout plants receiving no nitrogenous fertilizer, but not in nitrogen-treated plants. Intervention effect Mosaic slightly increased root sucrose content. Intervention effect End-of-June mosaic infection caused a 20 yo sugar-yield loss in nitrogen-fertilized plants. Intervention effect Yellows infection of similar plants at the same date reduced sugar yield by 50%. Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil conditioners increased crop yield s in most experiments but decrease d yield in one.
Soil conditioners e0 t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Secondary effects on crops included increases in crop yield s (in one experiment a decrease ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–449 t0 “The effect of soil conditioners on plant growth and soil structure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine maxt0
Zea mays.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Prunus dulcis
Avena sativa
Triticum aestivum
Gossypium hirsutum
Lolium
Zea mays subsp. mays
Solanum tuberosum
Linum usitatissimum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris