Claim · model-written summary
Correlation of toughness with yield is -0.063 in spring wheat lines.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated that the yield of the three wheat lines were all higher than that of Yongliang4,while the differences among them were not significant”
e1“Correlation of agronomic characters to the yield was presented below”
e2“toughness(-0.063)”
Title
VARIANCE AND CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY CHARACTERS IN SPRING WHEAT LINES
Shuxiang Guo Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University 2009
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Observation Yield of the three spring wheat lines was higher than that of Yongliang4.
- Observation Yield differences among the three spring wheat lines were not significant.
- Association Correlation of awn length with yield is 0.254 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of main ear of long with yield is 0.189 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of effective tiller number with yield is 0.171 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of fruiting spikelets number with yield is 0.122 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of each ear of number of seeds with yield is 0.111 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of sterile spikelets number with yield is 0.109 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of seeds weight of each ear with yield is 0.032 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of plant height with yield is -0.040 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of 1000-grain weight with yield is -0.216 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Correlation of diameter of seeds with yield is -0.620 in spring wheat lines.
- Association Yield was negatively related to kernel hardness, sedimentation value and wet gluten content, significantly but feebly.
- Association Yield was negatively related to dry gluten content and test weight, significantly but feebly.
- Association Height and test weight were significantly, feebly and negatively related in spring wheat lines.
- Association The other agronomic characters showed no significant correlation with quality characters.
- Observation Line 07-1 was better than the other lines in agronomic and quality characters.