View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear largely caused the decrease in maize grain yield .
Outcomedecrease in grain yield e4 Qualifierlargely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear e4 Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
Outcomeappropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The maize yield decrease from delayed emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones.
Settingyield stability zones e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in maize yield caused by the delay in emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2129–2244 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In 2023 there was a decrease in yield compared with near-normal precipitation in 2021.
Verbatim
e1 “there was a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1322 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield tended to decrease above 32°C.
Qualifiertemperatures exceed 32°C e0 SettingUpper East region e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maize yield in the Upper East region tends to decrease when temperatures exceed 32°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–858 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield did not decrease with increasing plant diversity.
Treatmentincreasing plant diversity e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Maize yield did not decrease with increasing plant diversity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–921 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At Manhattan in 2008, delayed planting did not decrease yield .
Treatmentdelayed planting e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 e0 “did not decrease at all with delayed planting in 2008 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1126 t1 “delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Each additional degree of future summer warming could decrease corn yield by 13 %.
Treatmentfuture warming during summer months e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “of future warming during summer months, corn and soybean yield s could potentially decrease by 13 % and 16%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–907 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The grain yield decrease in Ant-Pop was insignificant.
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in the grain yield of Ant-Pop cultivar was insignificiant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–606 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield may decrease at higher rainfall.
Settinghigher rainfall levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “manioc and maize may decrease at higher rainfall levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–654 e1 “Crop yield s show no increase with rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–592 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive genetic variance did not decrease with recurrent selection for grain yield in BS13.
Treatmentrecurrent selection for grain yield e1 Outcomeadditive genetic variance e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Synthetic Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 e1 “Estimates of additive genetic variance did not decrease with recurrent selection for grain yield in BS13 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1857 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Early ethephon application caused less yield decrease than later application.
TreatmentEarly application e0 Directionless yield decrease e0 Comparatorlater timings e0 Verbatim
e0 “Early application showed less yield decrease than later timings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1185 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest ethephon may decrease grain yield without lodging.
Outcomedecrease grain yield e0 Qualifierin the absence of lodging e0 Verbatim
e0 “may decrease grain yield in the absence of lodging because of its potential deleterious effect on kernel number and growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1830 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Loss of seed treatments would decrease corn yield through yield losses.
TreatmentThe loss of seed treatments e2 Directiondecrease inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “The loss of seed treatments would result in yield losses to both corn and soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–285 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Upright leaves tended to decrease grain yield below LAI 3 or 4.
Treatmentupright leaves e0 Qualifierlow LAI (below 3 or 4) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At low LAI (below 3 or 4), upright leaves tended to decrease grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–633 e1 “corn ( Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–296 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under limiting Zn, grain yield tended to decrease as young-tissue P concentration increased.
Qualifierincreasing P concentrations in young plant tissues e0 Not reported Material Gene Interactor Interactor role Treatment Comparator Setting Value
Verbatim
e0 “When Zn was limiting, grain yield s tended to decrease with increasing P concentrations in young plant tissues. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1155 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heating caused a smaller decrease in extracted zein yield .
Outcomeyield of zein extracted with 70% ethanol-0.5% sodium acetate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A smaller decrease occurred in yield of zein extracted with 70% ethanol-0.5% sodium acetate. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–664 e1 “Lysine and available lysine contents were reduced slightly by heating at the highest temp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1159 t0 “corn ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Larger fertilizer applications can decrease plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall.
Treatmentlarger applications e0 Qualifierseasons of poor rainfall e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “larger applications can even decrease the plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2298 e1 “corn acreage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2056 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
For the lower- yield ing group, each 1% decrease in borer infestation corresponded to 17 lb. greater grain yield .
Verbatim
e0 “17 lb. increase per 1% decrease for the lower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–856 t0 “BUSSEOLA FUSCA, AND YIELD OF MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–87 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A small but consistent yield decrease occurred when high levels of anhydrous NH3 were applied to air-dry rather than moist soil.
Treatmenthigh levels of anhydrous NH 3 e2 Qualifiersmall but consistent e2 Comparatormoist condition e3 Verbatim
e7 “Three greenhouse pot experiments were conducted with corn grown on Mountview loam ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 e2 “A small but consistent decrease in yield was observed when high levels of anhydrous NH 3 were applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1317 e3 “rather than moist condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1368 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At lowest fertility, raising population from 8,000 to 24,000 reduced yield by 22.7 bushels.
Treatmentincreasing plant populations from 8,000 to 24,000 plants e0 OutcomeYield differences e0 Qualifierlowest fertility level e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield differences attributable to increasing plant populations from 8,000 to 24,000 plants, ranged from a decrease of 22.7 on the lowest fertility level to an increase of 64.8 bushels on the high fertility level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1354 e1 “corn grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–185 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Fertilizer increased corn yield at all locations. Observation Fertilizer yield gains ranged from 7.5 to 101.9 bushels per acre. Association Fertilizer response varied with population, initial soil fertility, and to a lesser extent hybrid. Intervention effect At high fertility, populations above 8,000 plants per acre increased grain yields in all hybrids. Observation At high fertility, lowest density gave lowest yield and approximately 24,000 plants per acre gave best yield. Observation At low fertility, density response varied from slight increases to slight consistent decreases. Intervention effect At high fertility, raising population from 8,000 to 24,000 increased yield by 64.8 bushels. Observation Intermediate populations produced intermediate yield differences at both fertility levels. Observation At high fertility up to 16,000 plants per acre, the late hybrid generally yielded more than adapted and early hybrids. Observation Above 16,000 plants per acre, the adapted hybrid generally equaled or exceeded the late hybrid. Observation At low fertility, hybrid yield differences were small and inconsistent, with general advantages for adapted and early types. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower nitrogen levels decrease d grain protein and oil content.
Treatmentlower N levels e0 OutcomeProtein and oil content of grain e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Protein and oil content of grain was found to decrease with higher plant populations and lower N levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–112 t0 “Corn Hybrids1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High chloride concentrations applied in row fertilization decrease d corn growth, maturity and yield .
TreatmentHigh concentrations of chloride attained in row fertilization e1 Outcomegrowth, maturity, and yield e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “High concentrations of chloride attained in row fertilization had adverse effects on corn growth, maturity, and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–126 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Minor leaf injuries did not significantly decrease yield .
TreatmentMinor leaf injuries e0 Directiondid not result in significant decreases e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Minor leaf injuries which were designed to upset the elaboration and translocation of synthesized plant food did not result in significant decrease s in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1549 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under severe drought, leaf and stalk injury reduced yield less than in normal seasons.
Treatmentleaf and stalk injuries e0 Directiondid not result in as great a decrease e0 Comparatornormal seasons e0 Verbatim
e0 “Severe drouth in 1930 caused moisture to become the limiting factor so that leaf and stalk injuries did not result in as great a decrease in yield as in normal seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2452–2619 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.