View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Lactuca sativa ✕
Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Coir-based growing media can be reused for another short-cycle crop such as lettuce without yield loss or phytonutrient decrease .
Outcomewithout yield loss or phytonutrients decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Coir-based growing media can be reused for another short-cycle crop, like lettuce, without yield loss or phytonutrients decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1227 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar peptide fertilizers caused no fresh shoot yield change or a slight decrease with Zn-peptide.
TreatmentZn-peptide treatment e0 Outcomefresh shoot yield e0 Directionslight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 e0 “foliar treatments with peptides-based fertilizers induced no fresh shoot yield variations or a slight decrease in the case of Zn-peptide treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–574 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Iso-osmotic salt concentrations caused only a moderate decrease of fresh yield in lettuce
Treatmentiso-osmotic salt concentrations e5 Directionmoderate decrease e5 Verbatim
e1 “green and red lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–526 e5 “The treatments with iso-osmotic salt concentrations did not affect K and Mg ion contents but further increased LAA and resulted only in a moderate decrease of fresh yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1721 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing NaOCl concentration made lettuce yield decrease more.
Treatmentincreasing NaOCl concentration e5 Directionmore decreased e5 Verbatim
t0 “Lettuce Cultivation in Hydroponics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–72 e5 “With increasing NaOCl concentration, lettuce yield became more decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1098 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced irrigation significantly decrease d marketable lettuce yield .
TreatmentReducing irrigation e0 Outcomemarketable yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reducing irrigation had resulted in significant decrease of marketable yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1075 t0 “LETTUCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessively high nitrogen rates decrease d lettuce yield .
Treatmentexcessively high N rates e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “excessively high N rates could decrease its yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–292 t0 “Lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield .
Treatment20 kg Cd ha(-1) application e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511 e1 “lettuce plant and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing nitrogen from N90 to N60 did not decrease lettuce yield .
Directionwithout decreasing e0 ComparatorN90 treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to the N90 treatment, N2O emission of N60 was reduced by 42% in loam soil and 30% in deep sandy soil without decreasing crop yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1151 t0 “Lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ETR 100, quantum yield decrease d and nonphotochemical quenching increased.
Verbatim
e0 “resulting in a gradual decrease of Φ PSII and an increase in NPQ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1670 t0 “lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1292 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
NaN03-soluble soil nickel better predicted lettuce yield decrease than total or CaCl2-soluble soil nickel.
TreatmentNaN03‐soluble soil Ni e0 Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Qualifierirrespective of soil type e0 Comparatortotal soil Ni (Added+ Native) and CaCl2 soluble soil Ni e0 Verbatim
e0 “NaN03‐soluble soil Ni, irrespective of soil type, is better suited to predict the decrease in yield and increase in Ni‐concentration of lettuce leaves as compared to total soil Ni (Added+ Native) and CaCl2 soluble soil Ni. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–711 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1800 ppm foliar rate can decrease head size and percent salable heads of lettuce.
Treatment1800 ppm foliar rate e5 Outcomehead size and percent salable heads e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Lactuca sativa L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–48 e5 “The 1800 ppm foliar rate is undesirable since it can decrease head size and percent salable heads ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–653 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further calcium increases reduced yield through salinity and obscured further nickel-toxicity alleviation.
Treatmentfurther increases of Ca e0 Qualifierany further alleviation of the Ni toxicity was not discernible e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “further increases of Ca resulted in yield decrease due to salinity, so that any further alleviation of the Ni toxicity was not discernible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–814 e1 “lettuce seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–116 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At the highest initial population density, M. hapla caused lettuce yield losses of up to 64% in microplots.
Directiondecrease inferred e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Lettuce was seeded in pots in the greenhouse and in field microplots in 1991 and 1992. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 e4 “At the highest Pi, M. hapla caused yield losses up to 64% in the microplots and plant death in the greenhouse tests. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–491 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In 1994, Fluazinam and Topsin M significantly increased marketable lettuce yield compared with no treatment.
TreatmentFluazinam and Topsin M e1 Outcomemarketable yield e1 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf drop of lettuce is caused by the plant pathogenic fungi Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 e1 “In the 1994 trial, Fluazinam and Topsin M provided significant decrease of disease and significant increase inmarketable yield compared to no treatment in plots infested with Sclerotinia minor or S. sclerotiorum . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–481 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In 1994, Fluazinam and Topsin M significantly decrease d lettuce disease compared with no treatment in plots infested with Sclerotinia minor or S. sclerotiorum .
TreatmentFluazinam and Topsin M e1 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf drop of lettuce is caused by the plant pathogenic fungi Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 e1 “In the 1994 trial, Fluazinam and Topsin M provided significant decrease of disease and significant increase inmarketable yield compared to no treatment in plots infested with Sclerotinia minor or S. sclerotiorum . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–481 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Flooding water and poor drainage decrease d plant yield .
Treatmentflooding water and bad drainage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the influence of flooding water and bad drainage can decrease plant yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1203 t0 “Tanaman Selada (Lactuca sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–170 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.