View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Capsicum annuum ✕
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease in fruit set percent led to a reduction in total yield per plant.
Outcometotal yield per plant e0 QualifierDecrease in fruit set percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in fruit set percent led to reduction in the total yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1293 t0 “Capsicum annuum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosystem II quantum yield under drought was significantly measured in all leaf zones.
Organ / stageall leaf zones e6 Treatmentdrought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–119 e0 “measuring chlorophyll fluorescence related to drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–652 e6 “Decrease in ${\Phi}PSII$ could was significantly measured in all leaf zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1636 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low light did not decrease maximum PS II quantum yield at any leaf stage.
Treatmentlow light condition e0 Outcomemaximum quantum yield of PS II (Fv/Fm) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in maximum quantum yield of PS II (Fv/Fm) was not observed at any stages of the leaf development under low light condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1017 t0 “Sweet Pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 t1 “Sweet Pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 50% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease .
Treatmentreduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% e0 Outcomeyield of peppers e0 Directiondid not cause a statistically significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397 t0 “Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 75% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease .
Treatmentreduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% e0 Outcomeyield of peppers e0 Directiondid not cause a statistically significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397 t0 “Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yolo Wonder had fewer fruits under reduced irrigation.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in fruit number in ‘Yolo Wonder’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–910 t0 “Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–64 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Red fruit length, width and weight tended to decrease as harvest was delayed
Treatmentdelaying harvest dates e1 OutcomeRed fruit length and width and weight e1 Verbatim
e0 “The study was aimed to compare yield and fruit quality of red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) by different harvest frequency and single harvest dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 e1 “Red fruit length and width and weight had tendency to decrease with delaying harvest dates, especially fruit weight was lowest at harvest on September ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–297 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Apparent quantum yield was less affected by lower temperature.
Treatmentdecrease in temperature e0 Outcomeapparent quantum yield of photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sweet Pepper Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 e0 “the apparent quantum yield of photosynthesis was less affected by the decrease in temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–805 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Increases or decrease s in yield were attributable to differences in fruit load.
Treatmentdifferences in the fruit load e0 DirectionIncrease or decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increase or decrease in yield was attributable to differences in the fruit load ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–586 t0 “Sweet Pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity yield decrease ranged from 2.3 to 7.6% for each dS m-1 of EC.
Outcomesalinity yield decrease e7 Qualifierfor each dS m-1 e7 Verbatim
e0 “Tomatoes, cucumbers and sweet peppers (capsicums) were grown in hydroponic systems in which the nutrient solutions were recirculated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 e7 “salinity yield decrease values ranged from 2.3 to 7.6% for each dS m-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–950 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem length and nodes increased as spacing decrease d.
Outcomestem length and the number of nodes per stem e0 Directionincreased linearly e0 Verbatim
e0 “The stem length and the number of nodes per stem increased linearly with the decrease in plant spacing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1125 t0 “sweet pepper ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum growth suppression of the susceptible pepper genotype was 84% at M. incognita density Pi 16.
TreatmentPi 16 eggs and juveniles/cm soil e3 Outcomegrowth suppression e3 Directiondecrease inferred e3 Verbatim
e1 “The relationships between a geometric series of 13 initial densities (Pi) of Meloidogyne incognita between 0 and 128 eggs and juveniles/cm soil and yield s of a susceptible and a resistant genotype of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum ) were investigated in 40-L microplots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–267 e3 “Maximum growth suppression of the susceptible and resistant genotypes was 84% and 50%, respectively, and occurred in both genotypes at Pi 16 eggs and juveniles/cm soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–720 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative growth tended to decrease at higher CO2 levels.
Treatmenthigher CO2 levels e0 OutcomeVegetative growth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Vegetative growth tended to decrease at higher CO2 levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–584 t0 “sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–124 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.