View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Gossypium hirsutum ✕
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density increased.
InteractorGoosegrass t1 weed OutcomeSeed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the increase in weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 t1 “Goosegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield and boll weight tended to decrease with more nitrogen.
Outcomeseed cotton yield and boll weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The seed cotton yield and boll weight tended to decrease as more N was applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–827 Other claims from this paper (8) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Selection for increased yield may lead to a decrease in 2.5 % span length.
Treatmentselection for increased yield e0 Outcome2.5 % span length e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 e0 “selection for increased yield may leads to decrease in 2.5 % span length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–981 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maximum quantum yield indicates damage to the photosynthetic apparatus.
Outcomedamage to the photosynthetic apparatus e1 Qualifierdecrease in the maximum quantum yield e1 Verbatim
e0 “cotton plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–753 e1 “This decrease in the maximum quantum yield indicates damage to the photosynthetic apparatus of the plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1114 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Abiotic stresses decrease cotton yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Each of these stressors negatively affects the cotton crop (Gossypium spp.) and results in significant yield decrease s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–256 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DT6 cotton yield did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 e1 “The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher seasonal MPB totals produced the greatest lint yield decrease .
TreatmentHigher seasonal totals e0 Verbatim
e0 “Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The hybrid Varalaxmi suffered a decrease in seed cotton yield associated with red leaf.
Outcomeyield of seed cotton e0 Verbatim
e0 “The hybrid Varalaxmi did not appear to maintain its nitrogen balance and suffered from red leaf with consequent decrease in the yield of seed cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–320 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 Other claims from this paper (6) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture deficit can decrease the impact of ozone on cotton yield .
Treatmentsoil moisture deficit e5 Outcomeimpact of O 3 on cotton yield e5 Verbatim
t0 “Injury and Yield Response of Cotton to Chronic Doses of Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 e5 “Results indicate that soil moisture deficit can decrease the impact of O 3 on cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1238 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water permeability combined with shorter roots enlarged the predicted lint yield decrease .
Treatmentdecreased root length was combined with reduced soil water permeability e0 Outcomedecrease in lint yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This decrease in lint yield was much larger when decrease d root length was combined with reduced soil water permeability in remaining roots. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1072 t0 “Yield Decline in Cotton. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–49 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Yield was predicted to decrease with more backcrosses to the primitive accession.
Treatmentmore cycles of backcrossing to the accession e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield was predicted to decrease with more cycles of backcrossing to the accession ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–809 e1 “Primitive accessions of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nutsedge density was associated with a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield
TreatmentIncreasing nutsedge density e0 Outcomeseed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus ) density on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–104 e0 “Increasing nutsedge density caused a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–315 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result mixed basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude an arsenical herbicide generally increases sicklepod control but may delay cotton maturity and decrease yield .
Interactorsicklepod e0 weed Outcomeaddition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac e0 Qualifierpotential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Where sicklepod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1340 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organophosphate treatments could decrease yield through toxicity when nematode populations were low.
Treatmentorganophosphate e1 Qualifierthe toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “or in a yield decrease , because the toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–963 e1 “with organophosphate and carbamate nematicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–752 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Carbamate treatments could decrease yield through toxicity when nematode populations were low.
Treatmentcarbamate nematicides e1 Qualifierthe toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “or in a yield decrease , because the toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–963 e1 “with organophosphate and carbamate nematicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–752 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton yield decrease d with distance from grain crops; 78% of the decrease was attributed to linear effects.
Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease d as one moved away from the grain crops and 78% of this decrease could be attributed to linear effects. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–859 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant tissue calcium content decrease d with decrease d yield .
Organ / stageplant tissues e0 Qualifierdecreased yields e0 Verbatim
e0 “Associated with decrease d yield s of the plants tested was an increase in the sodium content and a corresponding decrease in the calcium content of the plant tissues. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1381 t0 “Alfalfa and Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither insecticide changed end-of-season cotton yield for Acala 1517C.
Directionneither variety showed a decrease nor increase e0 Qualifierat the end of the season e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The Acala 1517C reacted in a somewhat different manner to the treatments but neither variety showed a decrease nor increase in yield of cotton at the end of the season. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–410 t0 “Effects of Systemic Insecticide Seed Treatments on Two Varieties of Cotton1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither insecticide changed end-of-season cotton yield for Pima S-1.
Directionneither variety showed a decrease nor increase e0 Qualifierat the end of the season e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The Acala 1517C reacted in a somewhat different manner to the treatments but neither variety showed a decrease nor increase in yield of cotton at the end of the season. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–410 t0 “Effects of Systemic Insecticide Seed Treatments on Two Varieties of Cotton1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 e1 “Pima S-1 and Acala 1517C cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–96 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Field N applications tended to decrease cotton yield .
Treatmentapplications of N e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “applications of N increased soil and petiole NO 3 but tended to decrease cotton yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–433 e1 “cotton petioles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–128 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil loss below 3.8 kg/ha on 1- to 3-week-old cotton plants did not reduce yield .
Organ / stage1‐ to 3‐weekold e0 Treatmentsoil loss of less than 3.8 kg/ha e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Valueless than 3.8 kg/ha e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A soil loss of less than 3.8 kg/ha (1.7 tons/acre) on 1‐ to 3‐weekold cotton plants did not decrease yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–439 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.