View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Vitis ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
biological efficiency and yield indicators e3 without a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No decrease of yield quality was ever recorded after zeolitite application.
zeolitite application e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no differences in the yield composition related to the time of zeolitite application, as well as a decrease of yield quality, were ever recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–898 e1 “towards grapevine grey mould and sour rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield fluctuated annually without systematically declining.
did not systematically decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “large yearly fluctuations in yield , which did not systematically decrease over time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1391 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grapevine decline was accompanied by a decrease in fruit yield quality.
fruit yield quality e2 Verbatim
e2 “Syndromes of declined grapevine plants included growth retardant of shoot system and root-rot as well as decrease of grapevine fruit yield quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–307 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytoplasma infection was accompanied by a large final yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The phytoplasma infection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Covered inter-rows reduced vineyard yield by 10-13Â % in 2014.
covered inter-rows e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Keywords: grapevine, cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2255–2287 e5 “Viticultural measurements (2014) show a 10-13 % decrease of yield in case of covered inter-rows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1981 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The highest nitrogen rate produced the largest decrease in grape soluble solids.
largest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with the highest rate (112 kg N/ha) resulting in the largest decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2175 e1 “soluble solids over C0 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2076 t0 “Grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading was associated with a decrease in vine yield and total soluble solids in the berries.
vine yield, total soluble solids in the berries e6 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthetic activity of grapevine leaves (Sangiovese/Kober 5BB) was evaluated under field conditions on mature vines grown under three different levels of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 100%, 60%, and 30% sunlight) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–232 e6 “All of these modifications that occurred under shading are associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight, leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content, vine yield , total soluble solids in the berries, total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane, and winter pruning weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1776 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower Pnsat, Rd and PARc than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower PARsat than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect The apparent quantum yield (φi) of shade-grown grapevines was significantly higher than in unshaded vines. Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 62% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 54% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 81% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 65% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Association The diurnal patterns of Pn, gs and ψ in grapevine leaves were positively correlated with PAR at both phenological stages. Intervention effect Shading significantly reduced leaf transpiration rate in the early morning during flowering. Intervention effect Shading left the calculated intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of grapevine leaves unaffected. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight, leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content of grapevine. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane and winter pruning weight. Mechanism The increase of φi, leaf chlorophyll content and the change to a more open canopy increased PAR trapping efficiency, indicating adaptability of the grapevine to low light. Association Vine yield and berry quality decreased linearly with increasing shade intensity in grapevine. Recommendation Grapevine management should ensure that most leaves receive approximately 700 to 900 µmol m-2 S-1 of PAR for most of the day during the crop cycle. Recommendation Factors that modify light availability at the canopy level must be evaluated to reduce risks of low photosynthesis, low yield and poorer grape quality. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Both over and under irrigation reduced grapevine yield .
over and under irrigation e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE WATER USE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–38 e0 “This study demonstrated the deleterious effects of both over and under irrigation on yield of grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1052 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen-associated internal changes substantially decrease grape yield and quality.
grape yield and quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “numerous qualitative and quantitative changes occur inside it, which greatly decrease s grape yield and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–640 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 Title
Fungal diseases of grapevine
Goran Delibašić; Sanja Gajić; Srđan G. Aćimović AgroSpace (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture) 2006
Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors caution that competition for water and nutrients under hot and dry conditions can substantially decrease yield and vine capacity.
substantial decrease in yield and vine capacity e0 particularly if it occurs at sensitive stages (such as bloom and berry set) e0 hot and dry conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “under hot and dry conditions, competition for water and nutrients, particularly if it occurs at sensitive stages (such as bloom and berry set) can lead to a substantial decrease in yield and vine capacity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1305 t0 “Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism hypothesis original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Resistant rootstocks may slow colonization and thereby reduce Armillaria yield losses.
may decrease the rate of colonization e0 Verbatim
e0 “Resistant rootstocks may decrease the rate of colonization of grapevines in A. mellea -infested vineyards, thereby reducing yield losses from Armillaria root disease. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1517 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing potassium steadily decrease d acidity.
increase in supply of potassium e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “with the increase in supply of potassium there was a steady decrease in acidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–870 t0 “Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vitis
Candidatus Phytoplasma.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Armillaria mellea