View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater shade tended to decrease grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The shade levels tend to decrease grain yield and increase unfilled grain. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–741 t0 “upland rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate for the yield decrease in napiergrass.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1335 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
application of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield , although marginal was statistically insignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield .
herbicides evaluated e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 t1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
58% population decrease e0 164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
KCl tended to decrease yield in all cultivars.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In KCl treatment yield tended to decrease in all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Damage around tasseling-anthesis caused the greatest yield decrease in forage maize.
tasseling‐anthesis e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Decrease of yield was the highest when treatments were applied around tasseling‐anthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–335 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet had the greatest yield decrease under intercropping.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Pearl millet was the cereal with the greatest decrease in yield when intercropped ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1125 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Early ethephon application caused less yield decrease than later application.
Early application e0 less yield decrease e0 later timings e0 Verbatim
e0 “Early application showed less yield decrease than later timings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1185 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Spring paclobutrazol tended to decrease early yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “but tended to decrease the early yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–600 t0 “Paclobutrazol—A Plant Growth Retardant for Increasing Yield and Fruit Quality in Muskmelon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus application lightened the yield decrease to some degree.
increasing the amount of phosphorus application e1 to some degree e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Yield Decrease Resulting from Continual Direct Sowing Culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–91 e1 “This yield decrease could be lightened to some degree by increasing the amount of phosphorus application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2378 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Captafol did not decrease potato yield .
did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most effective chemical was captafol, which was as effective as quintozene and, unlike quintozene, did not decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–692 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Daily sprinkle irrigation tended to decrease pepper yield .
sprinkle irrigated daily e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yield tended to decrease when the plants were sprinkle irrigated daily. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–434 t0 “Pepper plants ( Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–66 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Larger fertilizer applications can decrease plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall.
larger applications e0 seasons of poor rainfall e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “larger applications can even decrease the plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2298 e1 “corn acreage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2056 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further decrease in plant spacing in broccoli caused an abrupt reduction in yield .
Further decrease in the space between plants e4 abrupt reduction e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Plant spacing in broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e4 “Further decrease in the space between plants results in an abrupt reduction in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Withholding nitrogen after flowering did not decrease green soybean yield .
withholding nitrogen after flowering e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no decrease in yield in treatments withholding nitrogen after flowering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–552 e1 “In green soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–217 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.
shading the ears e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Selection for nematode resistance did not decrease sugar beet root yield .
Selection for resistance to nematode e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Selection for resistance to nematode did not decrease root yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–249 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher insecticide rates may decrease soybean yield .
higher rates of application e0 may cause foliage injury e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 e0 “higher rates of application may cause foliage injury to the extent of decreasing yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–260 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.
sulphur dioxide treatment e0 yield of alfalfa e0 no_change inferred e0 under none of the conditions studied e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Minor leaf injuries did not significantly decrease yield .
Minor leaf injuries e0 did not result in significant decreases e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Minor leaf injuries which were designed to upset the elaboration and translocation of synthesized plant food did not result in significant decrease s in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1549 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under severe drought, leaf and stalk injury reduced yield less than in normal seasons.
leaf and stalk injuries e0 did not result in as great a decrease e0 normal seasons e0 Verbatim
e0 “Severe drouth in 1930 caused moisture to become the limiting factor so that leaf and stalk injuries did not result in as great a decrease in yield as in normal seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2452–2619 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil sterilizer treatment considerably decrease d tomato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the effect of the treatment on growth and yield : the latter showed a considerable decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–354 t0 “tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Some nitrogen additions apparently decrease d yield .
addition of nitrogen e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In some cases there was an apparent decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4354–4407 e1 “the addition of nitrogen-whether or not it increased the nitrate reserve-did not result in materially increased yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4234–4352 t0 “Pineapple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.JPG?width=60)
Amaranthus caudatust0
Phaseolus vulgaris
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Cenchrus purpureus
Triticum aestivum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Glycine max
Gossypium hirsutum
Cenchrus americanus
Zea mays subsp. mays.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Cucumis melo
Solanum tuberosum
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Medicago sativa
Solanum lycopersicum
Ananas comosus