View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
This decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
58% population decrease e0 164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
This decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
tillering stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
disease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation author interpretation review summary measured Claim · model-written summary
Diseases may decrease marketable root yield .
yield of marketable roots e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease the yield of marketable roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–313 t0 “table beet ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–117 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition can decrease alfalfa yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Weeds compete with alfalfa for water, nutrients, light, and space. This competition can decrease yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
disease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield .
tree enrichment e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–818 t0 “oil palm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–61 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maintaining a high proportion of double-flowered plants may decrease seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining a high percentage of plants with double-flowered capitula may decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–933 t0 “Zinnia
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The same selection predicted a yield decrease of 87 pounds per acre.
87 pounds yield per acre e0 Verbatim
e0 “An expected correlated response was a decrease of 87 pounds yield per acre. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–827 t0 “Nicotiana tabacum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Yield was predicted to decrease with more backcrosses to the primitive accession.
more cycles of backcrossing to the accession e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield was predicted to decrease with more cycles of backcrossing to the accession ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–809 e1 “Primitive accessions of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Eight alleles favored yield increase and ASI decrease together.
Verbatim
e0 “Eight alleles were selected for their favourable concurrent effect on yield increase and ASI decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1306 t0 “maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yield s as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of the highly calcareous-soil population tended to decrease in highly calcareous soils.
highly calcareous soils e0 Verbatim
e0 “though in highly calcareous soils it tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–496 t0 “CYNODON DACTYLON ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Manioc yield may decrease at higher rainfall.
higher rainfall levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “manioc and maize may decrease at higher rainfall levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–654 e1 “Crop yield s show no increase with rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–592 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield may decrease at higher rainfall.
higher rainfall levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “manioc and maize may decrease at higher rainfall levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–654 e1 “Crop yield s show no increase with rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–592 Other claims from this paper (3)
not stated 27 Observation observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
The ensemble mean predicted a slight decrease of rainfall under RCP8.5.
a slight decrease under the RCP8.5 scenario e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “predict a strong decrease of rainfall under the RCP4.5 scenario and a slight decrease under the RCP8.5 scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1018 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
The ensemble mean predicted a strong decrease of rainfall under RCP4.5.
strong decrease of rainfall under the RCP4.5 scenario e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “predict a strong decrease of rainfall under the RCP4.5 scenario and a slight decrease under the RCP8.5 scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1018 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH and available content tended to decrease after sulfur application.
sulfur application e0 pH and available content of soils e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “After sulfur application in soils, pH and available content of soils tend to decrease after experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–538 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0.JPG?width=60){kind=small}
Amaranthus caudatus
Glycine max
Oryza sativa
Zea mays
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Medicago sativa
Zinnia
Phaseolus vulgaris
Helianthus annuus
Nicotiana tabacum
Gossypium hirsutum
Solanum tuberosum
Cynodon dactylon
Manihot esculenta