View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
QualifierThis decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
Treatmentincrease or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
Treatment58% population decrease e0 Comparator164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
QualifierThis decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
Organ / stagetillering stage e4 Outcomedecrease in the yield of the rice e4 Qualifierdecrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
Comparatordisease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition can decrease alfalfa yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Weeds compete with alfalfa for water, nutrients, light, and space. This competition can decrease yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density increased.
InteractorGoosegrass t1 weed OutcomeSeed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the increase in weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 t1 “Goosegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
Comparatordisease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
TaxonMerlot and Cabernet franc t0 Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1712 t0 “Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maintaining a high proportion of double-flowered plants may decrease seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining a high percentage of plants with double-flowered capitula may decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–933 t0 “Zinnia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
Treatment1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold-induced bolting was associated with a 10%-20% yield decrease .
TreatmentCold temperature e0 Verbatim
e0 “Cold temperature that would induce a biannual sugar beet to bolting,which would lead the yield to decrease 10%-20% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The same selection predicted a yield decrease of 87 pounds per acre.
Value87 pounds yield per acre e0 Verbatim
e0 “An expected correlated response was a decrease of 87 pounds yield per acre. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–827 t0 “Nicotiana tabacum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Knockout mutants had an average 4.88 g decrease in yield per plant.
MaterialKnockout mutants e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–159 e0 “Knockout mutants showed on an average 25.63% and 4.88 g decrease in SS and YPP, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1344 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The gene is also associated with decrease d yield .
Qualifierit is also responsible for a decrease in yield e0 Not reported Gene
Verbatim
e0 “it is also responsible for a decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1092 t0 “Wheat biofortification ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of the highly calcareous-soil population tended to decrease in highly calcareous soils.
Settinghighly calcareous soils e0 Verbatim
e0 “though in highly calcareous soils it tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–496 t0 “CYNODON DACTYLON ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Manioc yield may decrease at higher rainfall.
Settinghigher rainfall levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “manioc and maize may decrease at higher rainfall levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–654 e1 “Crop yield s show no increase with rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–592 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield may decrease at higher rainfall.
Settinghigher rainfall levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “manioc and maize may decrease at higher rainfall levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–654 e1 “Crop yield s show no increase with rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–592 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yield s as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
Qualifierfor every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.
Taxonvegetables, and ornamentals e1 Outcomecalculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible e0 Comparatorpolynomial model e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 e1 “various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163 Other claims from this paper (8)
not stated 2 Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soymilk yield , solids, protein content and protein recovery decrease d following soybean storage.
Outcomeyield, solid content, protein content and protein recovery of soymilk e0 Verbatim
e0 “Storage caused a decrease in the yield , solid content, protein content and protein recovery of soymilk ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2177–2279 t0 “Soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 Other claims from this paper (19) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The early-dough barley silage ration had lower intake and organic matter digestibility than the heading-stage ration, explaining lower energy-corrected milk yield .
Treatmentbarley silage at early dough stage e0 Qualifierdue to lower DMI and OMD e0 Comparatorbarley silage at the heading stage of maturity e0 Verbatim
e0 “This decrease in ECM yield was due to lower DMI and OMD of the ration containing barley silage at early dough stage than of the ration including barley silage at the heading stage of maturity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2040 e1 “fed to dairy cows in mid-late lactation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1658 Other claims from this paper (18) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.