View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
58% population decrease e0 164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
KCl tended to decrease yield in all cultivars.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In KCl treatment yield tended to decrease in all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
When soil water potential continued to decrease , no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.
SWP continued to be decreased e6 no longer obvious decrease e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Quality of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52 e2 “the yield of two cultivars was decrease d significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558 e6 “but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield .
low combined densities e0 do not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low combined densities do not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122 t0 “Brassica napus L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield .
tree enrichment e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–818 t0 “oil palm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–61 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The cranberry yield decrease vanished the year after outlet redesign.
redesigning the outlet e0 the following year e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cranberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 e0 “This yield decrease vanished the following year after redesigning the outlet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–360 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease .
cocoa/cassava combination e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d bud number and flower yield .
number of buds and a decrease in flower yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress caused a decrease in the number of buds and a decrease in flower yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–791 t0 “Miniature Rose Varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–68 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Knockout mutants had an average 4.88 g decrease in yield per plant.
Knockout mutants e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–159 e0 “Knockout mutants showed on an average 25.63% and 4.88 g decrease in SS and YPP, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1344 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
RNAi suppression of cell-wall lignin biosynthesis can decrease biomass yield .
RNAi suppression of cell-wall lignin biosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “RNAi suppression of cell-wall lignin biosynthesis can decrease biomass yield and resistance to biotic stress in the transgenic plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–775 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Constitutive PrDA1-1 expression in Arabidopsis decrease yield .
constitutive expression e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PrDA1-1 was strongly expressed during both the early and late stages of seed development, and its constitutive expression in Arabidopsis reduced seed number but increased seed weight, which ultimately led to a decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–876 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Later nitrogen fertilization reduced its production benefit and tended to decrease dry yield .
nitrogen fertilizer e0 dry pasturage yield e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With fertilization time delay gradually,the role of nitrogen fertilizer on the increase production decrease d uccording to the experiment data and there was decrease tend in the dry pasturage yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–722 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixture selection history decrease d yield variability only in monocultures.
mixture selection history e0 only in monocultures e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a mixture selection history can increase yield productivity and decrease its variability, although only in monocultures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1002 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
N fertilization did not decrease species diversity over time.
N fertilization e0 species diversity e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “N fertilization did not decrease species diversity through time. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1453 Other claims from this paper (14)
not stated 7 Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH and available content tended to decrease after sulfur application.
sulfur application e0 pH and available content of soils e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “After sulfur application in soils, pH and available content of soils tend to decrease after experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–538 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The essential oil and santolindiacetylene gave a significant hepatoprotective effect, with a strong decrease of elevated GPT serum levels after carbon tetrachloride-induced liver damage in rats.
essential oil and its main component e4 GPT serum levels e3 carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic damage e3 Verbatim
e2 “The yield , composition, and some pharmacological activities (hepatoprotective and antioxidant) of the essential oil of Santolina canescens aerial parts have been investigated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–174 e3 “In both cases a significant hepatoprotective effect was observed, as evident from the strong decrease of elevated GPT serum levels caused by carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–743 e4 “The protective activities of the essential oil and its main component [1] were evaluated against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in a rat model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–557 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Aurora 40 WG decrease d soil Azotobacter abundance.
Aurora 40 WG herbicide e2 Azotobacter abundance e0 uncontaminated soil e3 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in Azotobacter abundance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1111 e1 “The yield of spring barley dry matter was determined on the last day of the experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–929 e2 “The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the Aurora 40 WG herbicide ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 e3 “uncontaminated soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–445 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.JPG?width=60)
Amaranthus caudatust0
Glycine max
Gossypium hirsutum
Oryza sativa_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Helianthus annuus
Solanum tuberosum
Theobroma cacao
Phaseolus vulgaris
Arabidopsis
Santolina canescens