View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
These combinations did not significantly decrease yield .
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025 t0 “Isabella grape variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara showed a statistically insignificant straw yield decrease .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The Lara variety showed an insignificant decrease in the straw yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1207 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The maize yield decrease from delayed emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones.
Settingyield stability zones e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in maize yield caused by the delay in emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2129–2244 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Keeping available water depletion below 25% produced no significant crop- yield decrease .
Treatmentmaintaining AWC depletion below 25% e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining AWC depletion below 25% resulted in no significant decrease in crop yield and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2257 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing potassium to N60P60K30 did not significantly decrease soybean yield .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no significant decrease in soybean yield in the variant of the experiment with a decrease in the proportion of potassium in the composition of complete mineral fertilizer (N60P60K30) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1646 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Full season maize hybrids showed a nonsignificant yield decrease with maturity.
Materialfull season hybrids e0 Verbatim
e0 “non-significant decrease in grain yield with relative maturity in full season hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1130 t0 “Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–85 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of KSZnB did not significantly decrease yield .
Treatmentomission of KSZnB nutrients e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no significant (p<0.05) decrease in yield due to the omission of KSZnB nutrients ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–924 t0 “tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–48 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
Outcomebiological efficiency and yield indicators e3 Qualifierwithout a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Short-term conservation tillage did not significantly decrease corn yield .
Treatmentshort-term implementation of conservation tillage e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the short-term implementation of conservation tillage did not result in a significant decrease in corn yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2029 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the pot experiment there was no significant decrease in tef grain yield at potassium levels above 40 mg L−1.
Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Outcome
Verbatim
t0 “Tef (Eragrostis tef ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 e0 “with no significant decrease thereafter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–927 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.