Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

These combinations did not significantly decrease yield.

Taxon: grapet0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“without a significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025

t0
“Isabella grape variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510

Title

Impact of combination application of herbicides and mineral fertilizers on the chemical composition of must and wine

Madina B. Khokonova Izvestiya of Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V M Kokov 2022. doi:10.55196/2411-3492-2022-3-37-26-30

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Combined herbicides and fertilizers generally left must sugar at control level.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with simazine increased wort sugar.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with atrazine increased wort sugar.
Observation Wort titratable acids did not differ significantly.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NP slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NRK slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Observation Coloring substances and total phenols tended to increase in all variants.
Observation Simazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation Atrazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation These herbicides and fertilizers did not negatively affect wine organoleptic properties.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay cropping chili and watermelon showed no decrease in yield.

Taxon: chilie0
Interactor: watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0other
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The relay cropping of chili and watermelon plants was effective simultaneously, and there was no decrease in yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1590

Title

Study of Synthetic Fertilizer Chili and Organic Fertilizer Watermelon on Relay Cropping Fields

Avisema Sigit Saputro; Dewi Ratna Nur Hayati Jurnal Agrinika Jurnal Agroteknologi dan Agribisnis 2023. doi:10.30737/agrinika.v7i2.4614

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation chili and watermelon could be harvested simultaneously without competition.
Observation watermelon and chili could be harvested simultaneously without competition.
Observation There was no interaction between chilies and watermelon.
Intervention effect Colombus chili with NPK Mahkota had the highest weight.
Intervention effect Baginda watermelon at 60 ml/liter liquid organic fertilizer had the highest weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield did not decrease with cover crops.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment: with CCe5
Outcome: yielde5
Direction: did not decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5
“Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yields and decreased the silage corn yield; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185

Title

Do Cover Crops Increase Subsequent Crop Yield in Temperate Climates? A Meta-Analysis

Inderjot Chahal; Laura L. Van Eerd Sustainability 2023. doi:10.3390/su15086517

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than grass, by 14%.
Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than nonlegume broadleaves, by 7%.
Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than mixtures, by 2%.
Intervention effect Incorporating cover crop residue into soil increased crop yield by about 15% compared with leaving the residue on the soil surface.
Intervention effect Grass cover crops enhanced crop yield by 14% relative to no cover crop in non-organic vegetable systems.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops enhanced crop yield by 19% relative to no cover crop in non-organic vegetable systems.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 18% relative to no cover crop in coarse textured soil.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 4% relative to no cover crop in medium textured soil.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 11% relative to no cover crop under high precipitation.
Intervention effect Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yields.
Intervention effect Cover crops decreased silage corn yield.
Intervention effect Grain corn yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Intervention effect Winter wheat yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Intervention effect Cover crops in no-tillage and plow tillage systems increased crop yield compared with the no-CC control.
Recommendation Crop yield response to cover crops might become more robust when pedo-climatic and agronomic factors are considered.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)projected

Claim · model-written summary

Keeping available water depletion below 25% produced no significant crop-yield decrease.

Treatment: maintaining AWC depletion below 25%e0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“maintaining AWC depletion below 25% resulted in no significant decrease in crop yield and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2257

Title

Water Productivity of Irrigated Tomatoes in Eastern Canada Based on AquaCrop Simulations

Naresh Kumar Thangaraju Arumugagounder; Samuel Ihuoma; Chandra A. Madramootoo Journal of the ASABE 2022. doi:10.13031/ja.14792

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource Measured seasonal harvest index improved AquaCrop performance over defaults.
Method / resource Calibration dry-yield RMSE was 0.57 ton ha-1.
Method / resource Calibration biomass RMSE was 0.89 ton ha-1.
Method / resource Verification dry-yield RMSE was 0.28 ton ha-1.
Method / resource Verification biomass RMSE was 0.01 ton ha-1.
Intervention effect Keeping available water depletion below 25% produced no significant biomass decrease.
Recommendation The authors recommend maintaining available water depletion below 25% for irrigated tomato production.
Observation Water productivity was highest in fully irrigated fields across soil types.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain corn yield did not decrease with cover crops.

Taxon: grain corne5
Treatment: with CCe5
Outcome: yielde5
Direction: did not decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5
“Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yields and decreased the silage corn yield; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185

Title

Do Cover Crops Increase Subsequent Crop Yield in Temperate Climates? A Meta-Analysis

Inderjot Chahal; Laura L. Van Eerd Sustainability 2023. doi:10.3390/su15086517

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than grass, by 14%.
Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than nonlegume broadleaves, by 7%.
Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than mixtures, by 2%.
Intervention effect Incorporating cover crop residue into soil increased crop yield by about 15% compared with leaving the residue on the soil surface.
Intervention effect Grass cover crops enhanced crop yield by 14% relative to no cover crop in non-organic vegetable systems.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops enhanced crop yield by 19% relative to no cover crop in non-organic vegetable systems.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 18% relative to no cover crop in coarse textured soil.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 4% relative to no cover crop in medium textured soil.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 11% relative to no cover crop under high precipitation.
Intervention effect Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yields.
Intervention effect Cover crops decreased silage corn yield.
Intervention effect Soybean yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Intervention effect Winter wheat yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Intervention effect Cover crops in no-tillage and plow tillage systems increased crop yield compared with the no-CC control.
Recommendation Crop yield response to cover crops might become more robust when pedo-climatic and agronomic factors are considered.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield did not decrease with cover crops.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume5
Treatment: with CCe5
Outcome: yielde5
Direction: did not decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5
“Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yields and decreased the silage corn yield; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185

Title

Do Cover Crops Increase Subsequent Crop Yield in Temperate Climates? A Meta-Analysis

Inderjot Chahal; Laura L. Van Eerd Sustainability 2023. doi:10.3390/su15086517

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than grass, by 14%.
Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than nonlegume broadleaves, by 7%.
Intervention effect Legume cover crop species increased subsequent crop yield significantly more than mixtures, by 2%.
Intervention effect Incorporating cover crop residue into soil increased crop yield by about 15% compared with leaving the residue on the soil surface.
Intervention effect Grass cover crops enhanced crop yield by 14% relative to no cover crop in non-organic vegetable systems.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops enhanced crop yield by 19% relative to no cover crop in non-organic vegetable systems.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 18% relative to no cover crop in coarse textured soil.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 4% relative to no cover crop in medium textured soil.
Intervention effect Legume cover crops increased crop yield by 11% relative to no cover crop under high precipitation.
Intervention effect Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yields.
Intervention effect Cover crops decreased silage corn yield.
Intervention effect Grain corn yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Intervention effect Soybean yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Intervention effect Cover crops in no-tillage and plow tillage systems increased crop yield compared with the no-CC control.
Recommendation Crop yield response to cover crops might become more robust when pedo-climatic and agronomic factors are considered.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing potassium to N60P60K30 did not significantly decrease soybean yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: N60P60K30e0
Outcome: soybean yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“There was no significant decrease in soybean yield in the variant of the experiment with a decrease in the proportion of potassium in the composition of complete mineral fertilizer (N60P60K30)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1646

Title

Productivity and quality of soybean seeds with different fertilization on podzolized chernozem

H.M. Hospodarenko; I.V. Prokopchuk; K. P. Leonova; et al. Collected Works of Uman National University of Horticulture 2020. doi:10.31395/2415-8240-2020-97-1-136-144

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Different fertilizer regimes increased crop yield by 18–77 %.
Intervention effect N110P60K80 in rotation, including N60P60K60 under soybean, gave the highest seed yield of 3,02 t/ha.
Intervention effect Excluding nitrogen from N60P60K60 reduced yield by 26 %.
Intervention effect Excluding phosphorus from complete fertilizer reduced yield by 17 %.
Intervention effect Excluding potassium from complete fertilizer reduced yield by 11 %.
Intervention effect N60К60 produced the largest 1000-seed mass.
Intervention effect N60P60K60 and N60P60K30 produced the highest seed protein content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: presence of root hairse1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: did not decreasee1
Qualifier: under optimal conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–992

e1
“the presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2267–2341

Title

The effect of root hairs under drought in open field conditions

Maria Marin; Deborah S Feeney; Lawrie K Brown; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-6332

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not decrease in the first year without fertilization.

Taxon: winter wheat and summer maizeTriticum aestivum Zea mayse0
Treatment: without fertilizatione2
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: did not decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“comprising winter wheat and summer maize as an annual rotation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–541

e2
“The yield did not decrease in the first year without fertilization but started to decrease considerably in later years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1164

Title

Long-term legacy impacts of nitrogen fertilization on crop yield, nitrate accumulation, and nitrogen recovery efficiency

Shuang Lei; Sajjad Raza; Annie Irshad; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2025. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2025.127513

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect N fertilization increased grain yield compared with the control.
Intervention effect DCD addition caused additional increases in grain yield, mainly at 500 kg N ha-1.
Intervention effect Yield started to decrease considerably in later years without fertilization.
Intervention effect N fertilization increased grain N uptake by more than 100 % compared with the control in fertilized years and the first unfertilized year.
Intervention effect Grain N uptake decreased strongly in the second year without fertilization.
Intervention effect Cumulative fertilizer N recovery did not differ among N fertilized treatments during fertilized years.
Intervention effect Cumulative fertilizer N recovery increased strongly when N uptake in unfertilized years was incorporated.
Intervention effect Cumulative fertilizer N recovery in N340 + DCD increased from 37 %–44 % in fertilized years to 74 %–80 % in unfertilized years.
Observation A residual nitrate accumulation of 237–489 kg N ha-1 accumulated in the soil profile after two years of fertilization.
Intervention effect Residual N accumulation decreased by 31 %–41 % in the first unfertilized year.
Observation Soil N accumulation became less than 60 kg ha-1 after four years of cropping without fertilization, with no difference among treatments including control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bale storage did not decrease Cistus oil yield.

Taxon: Cistus ladaniferCistus ladanifere0
Treatment: storagee0
Outcome: oil yielde0
Direction: does not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The storage of mechanically harvested Cistus ladanifer does not decrease the oil yield of steam distillation on a pilot scale.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1029

Title

Influence of the Storage of Cistus ladanifer L. Bales from Mechanised Harvesting on the Essential Oil Yield and Qualitative Composition

Irene Mediavilla; María Amparo Blázquez; Alex Ruiz; et al. Molecules 2021. doi:10.3390/molecules26082379

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Storage decreased total monoterpene content in Cistus oil.
Intervention effect Storage increased oxygenated sesquiterpene content, especially after 100–120 days.
Intervention effect Storage did not affect qualitative essential oil composition.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics