Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Se0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 20.78%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6S, they significantly increased by 20.78%, 9.91%, 16.19%, 9.28%, 5.01%, and 4.14%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1825

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Se0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 9.91%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6S, they significantly increased by 20.78%, 9.91%, 16.19%, 9.28%, 5.01%, and 4.14%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1825

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In hybrid 7, elevated temperatures and excess light intensity led to a higher relative accumulation of LHCII.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material: hybrid 7e1
Treatment: elevated temperatures and excess light intensitye0
Outcome: relative accumulation of the light-harvesting complex of the photosystem (LHCII)e3
Direction: highere3
Comparator: morning environmental conditionse2

Verbatim

e0
“This study examined the photosynthetic responses of two sunflower hybrids to elevated temperatures and excess light intensity in the flowering stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–148

e1
“In hybrid 7, the elevated temperatures and the excess light intensity resulted in the inactivation of the oxygen-evolving complex”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–983

e2
“The morning environmental conditions were considered optimal, while the afternoon was characterised by elevated temperatures and excess light intensity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–503

e3
“the increase in the maximum quantum yield of PSII (TR0/ABS), the decrease in the electron transport further than the primary acceptor QA (ET0/(TR0-ET0)), the reduction in the performance index (PIABS), and the higher relative accumulation of the light-harvesting complex of the photosystem (LHCII)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1337

Title

Effect of Elevated Temperature and Excess Light on Photosynthetic Efficiency, Pigments, and Proteins in the Field-Grown Sunflower during Afternoon

Antonela Markulj Kulundžić; Marija Viljevac Vuletić; Maja Matoša Kočar; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8050392

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D15 increased nitrogen uptake by 0.9% over D5 in the wet year.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: D15e0
Outcome: N uptakee1
Direction: promotede0
Value: 0.9 %e0
Qualifier: wet yeare0
Comparator: D5e0

Verbatim

e0
“D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1164

e1
“Compared with D5, deep urea placement significantly increased the crop N uptake (10.4–27.6 %), grain N content (1.2–18.7 %), N recovery efficiency (NRE, 0.9–16.7 %) and N partial productivity (PFPN, 1.1–20.0 %) in dry and normal years, and D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year. Additionally, compared with D5, deep urea placement increased crop water productivity (WP) and yield by …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1379

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134

Title

Optimizing urea deep placement to rainfall can maximize crop water-nitrogen productivity and decrease nitrate leaching in winter wheat

Yingxin Wang; Qin Guo; Yirui Xu; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107971

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased root length and weight densities at 20–60 cm.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased grain nitrogen content by 1.2–18.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 0.9–16.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased grain nitrogen content by 1.3% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 3.7% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased crop water productivity by 9.6–23.9% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased yield by 3.2–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased water productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased yield by 0.5% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement raised soil nitrate accumulation by 4.7–14.5% compared with D5.
Observation Urea placement at 28.0–30.0 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in dry years.
Observation Urea placement at 20.7–21.6 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in normal years.
Observation Urea placement at 12.3–13.1 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in wet years.
Recommendation The authors recommend adjusting moderate urea placement depth to precipitation conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D15 increased grain nitrogen content by 1.3% over D5 in the wet year.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: D15e0
Outcome: grain N contente1
Direction: promotede0
Value: 1.3 %e0
Qualifier: wet yeare0
Comparator: D5e0

Verbatim

e0
“D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1164

e1
“Compared with D5, deep urea placement significantly increased the crop N uptake (10.4–27.6 %), grain N content (1.2–18.7 %), N recovery efficiency (NRE, 0.9–16.7 %) and N partial productivity (PFPN, 1.1–20.0 %) in dry and normal years, and D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year. Additionally, compared with D5, deep urea placement increased crop water productivity (WP) and yield by …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1379

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134

Title

Optimizing urea deep placement to rainfall can maximize crop water-nitrogen productivity and decrease nitrate leaching in winter wheat

Yingxin Wang; Qin Guo; Yirui Xu; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107971

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased root length and weight densities at 20–60 cm.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased grain nitrogen content by 1.2–18.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 0.9–16.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen uptake by 0.9% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 3.7% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased crop water productivity by 9.6–23.9% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased yield by 3.2–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased water productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased yield by 0.5% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement raised soil nitrate accumulation by 4.7–14.5% compared with D5.
Observation Urea placement at 28.0–30.0 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in dry years.
Observation Urea placement at 20.7–21.6 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in normal years.
Observation Urea placement at 12.3–13.1 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in wet years.
Recommendation The authors recommend adjusting moderate urea placement depth to precipitation conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D15 increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 3.7% over D5 in the wet year.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: D15e0
Outcome: N recovery efficiencye1
Direction: promotede0
Value: 3.7 %e0
Qualifier: wet yeare0
Comparator: D5e0

Verbatim

e0
“D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1164

e1
“Compared with D5, deep urea placement significantly increased the crop N uptake (10.4–27.6 %), grain N content (1.2–18.7 %), N recovery efficiency (NRE, 0.9–16.7 %) and N partial productivity (PFPN, 1.1–20.0 %) in dry and normal years, and D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year. Additionally, compared with D5, deep urea placement increased crop water productivity (WP) and yield by …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1379

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134

Title

Optimizing urea deep placement to rainfall can maximize crop water-nitrogen productivity and decrease nitrate leaching in winter wheat

Yingxin Wang; Qin Guo; Yirui Xu; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107971

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased root length and weight densities at 20–60 cm.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased grain nitrogen content by 1.2–18.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 0.9–16.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen uptake by 0.9% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased grain nitrogen content by 1.3% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased crop water productivity by 9.6–23.9% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased yield by 3.2–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased water productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased yield by 0.5% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement raised soil nitrate accumulation by 4.7–14.5% compared with D5.
Observation Urea placement at 28.0–30.0 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in dry years.
Observation Urea placement at 20.7–21.6 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in normal years.
Observation Urea placement at 12.3–13.1 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in wet years.
Recommendation The authors recommend adjusting moderate urea placement depth to precipitation conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D15 increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: D15e0
Outcome: N partial productivitye1
Direction: promotede0
Value: 1.1 %e0
Qualifier: wet yeare0
Comparator: D5e0

Verbatim

e0
“D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1164

e1
“Compared with D5, deep urea placement significantly increased the crop N uptake (10.4–27.6 %), grain N content (1.2–18.7 %), N recovery efficiency (NRE, 0.9–16.7 %) and N partial productivity (PFPN, 1.1–20.0 %) in dry and normal years, and D15 promoted those by 0.9 %, 1.3 %, 3.7 % and 1.1 % over D5 under wet year. Additionally, compared with D5, deep urea placement increased crop water productivity (WP) and yield by …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1379

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134

Title

Optimizing urea deep placement to rainfall can maximize crop water-nitrogen productivity and decrease nitrate leaching in winter wheat

Yingxin Wang; Qin Guo; Yirui Xu; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107971

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased root length and weight densities at 20–60 cm.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased grain nitrogen content by 1.2–18.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 0.9–16.7% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased nitrogen partial productivity by 1.1–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen uptake by 0.9% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased grain nitrogen content by 1.3% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 3.7% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased crop water productivity by 9.6–23.9% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement increased yield by 3.2–20.0% in dry and normal years.
Intervention effect D15 increased water productivity by 1.1% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect D15 increased yield by 0.5% over D5 in the wet year.
Intervention effect Deep urea placement raised soil nitrate accumulation by 4.7–14.5% compared with D5.
Observation Urea placement at 28.0–30.0 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in dry years.
Observation Urea placement at 20.7–21.6 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in normal years.
Observation Urea placement at 12.3–13.1 cm maximized wheat yield, grain nitrogen content and water productivity in wet years.
Recommendation The authors recommend adjusting moderate urea placement depth to precipitation conditions.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPS 1 population showed a genetic gain of -3.35% in ASI relative to MPS 2 population.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Material: MPS 1 populatione1
Treatment: heat stresse2
Outcome: ASIe1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: -3.35%e1
Comparator: MPS 2 populatione1
Setting: Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring seasone2

Verbatim

e0
“This study was designed to assess the genetic gain in various stress-adaptive traits of maize testcrosses derived from two heat tolerant heterotic multi-parental synthetic (MPS 1 and MPS 2) populations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–606

e1
“The maximum genetic gain was observed for grain yield (58.55%), days to 50 per cent anthesis (-2.05%), days to 50 per cent silking (-2.24%), ASI (-3.35%), plant height (4.25%) and ear height (5.49%) in MPS 1 population compared to MPS 2 population”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1776

e2
“were evaluated in Alpha lattice design with two replications at Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring season where the most part of reproductive stage, starting from tassel emergence until late grain filling, was exposed to heat stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1053

Title

Genetic Gain in Testcrosses Derived from Heat Tolerant Multi-parental Synthetic Populations of Maize

Muttappa Hosamani; I. Shankergoud; P. H. Zaidi; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.901.249

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPS 1 population showed a genetic gain of -2.05% in days to 50 per cent anthesis relative to MPS 2 population.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Material: MPS 1 populatione1
Treatment: heat stresse2
Outcome: days to 50 per cent anthesise1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: -2.05%e1
Comparator: MPS 2 populatione1
Setting: Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring seasone2

Verbatim

e0
“This study was designed to assess the genetic gain in various stress-adaptive traits of maize testcrosses derived from two heat tolerant heterotic multi-parental synthetic (MPS 1 and MPS 2) populations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–606

e1
“The maximum genetic gain was observed for grain yield (58.55%), days to 50 per cent anthesis (-2.05%), days to 50 per cent silking (-2.24%), ASI (-3.35%), plant height (4.25%) and ear height (5.49%) in MPS 1 population compared to MPS 2 population”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1776

e2
“were evaluated in Alpha lattice design with two replications at Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring season where the most part of reproductive stage, starting from tassel emergence until late grain filling, was exposed to heat stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1053

Title

Genetic Gain in Testcrosses Derived from Heat Tolerant Multi-parental Synthetic Populations of Maize

Muttappa Hosamani; I. Shankergoud; P. H. Zaidi; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.901.249

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPS 1 population showed a genetic gain of -2.24% in days to 50 per cent silking relative to MPS 2 population.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Material: MPS 1 populatione1
Treatment: heat stresse2
Outcome: days to 50 per cent silkinge1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: -2.24%e1
Comparator: MPS 2 populatione1
Setting: Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring seasone2

Verbatim

e0
“This study was designed to assess the genetic gain in various stress-adaptive traits of maize testcrosses derived from two heat tolerant heterotic multi-parental synthetic (MPS 1 and MPS 2) populations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–606

e1
“The maximum genetic gain was observed for grain yield (58.55%), days to 50 per cent anthesis (-2.05%), days to 50 per cent silking (-2.24%), ASI (-3.35%), plant height (4.25%) and ear height (5.49%) in MPS 1 population compared to MPS 2 population”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1776

e2
“were evaluated in Alpha lattice design with two replications at Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring season where the most part of reproductive stage, starting from tassel emergence until late grain filling, was exposed to heat stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1053

Title

Genetic Gain in Testcrosses Derived from Heat Tolerant Multi-parental Synthetic Populations of Maize

Muttappa Hosamani; I. Shankergoud; P. H. Zaidi; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.901.249

Other claims from this paper (8)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics