View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm decrease in seasonal precipitation corresponded to a 0.736 kg/ha decrease in pea yield .
Treatmenttotal precipitation for the growing season e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 1 mm decrease in the total precipitation for the growing season will lead to a decrease in pea yield s by an average of 0.736 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2186 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions.
Treatmentpresence of root hairs e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Qualifierunder optimal conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “barley (Hordeum vulgare ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–992 e1 “the presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2267–2341 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Violations of plant-microorganism interrelations caused by cultivation technologies can decrease yield potential of sunflower.
Treatmentcultivation technologies e2 Verbatim
e1 “are able to decrease yield potential of agricultural crops including sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–819 e2 “such as cultivation technologies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–739 Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The primary reason for the yield decrease was increased wheat infestation by pathogens.
Interactorpathogens e3 pathogen Verbatim
e3 “The primary reason for yield decrease in a given growing season was increased wheat infestation by pathogens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–706 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield started to decrease considerably in later years without fertilization.
Treatmentwithout fertilization e2 Directiondecrease considerably e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “comprising winter wheat and summer maize as an annual rotation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–541 e2 “The yield did not decrease in the first year without fertilization but started to decrease considerably in later years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1164 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was associated with total aboveground dry matter rather than harvest index.
Qualifiertotal aboveground dry matter e0 Comparatorharvest index e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in yield was related to the total aboveground dry matter rather than to the harvest index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–694 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not decrease in the first year without fertilization.
Treatmentwithout fertilization e2 Directiondid not decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “comprising winter wheat and summer maize as an annual rotation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–541 e2 “The yield did not decrease in the first year without fertilization but started to decrease considerably in later years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1164 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mogilev oats had a climate-induced yield decrease of 35–36%.
Treatmentclimate-induced e1 Verbatim
e0 “In Mogilev region, this decrease was lower: spring wheat – 17–30 %, spring barley – 22–33 %, oats – 35–36 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–732 e1 “most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the first block both corn hybrids showed a significant decrease in yield .
Outcomedecrease in yield e1 Verbatim
e0 “two corn hybrids of domestic selection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–492 e1 “In the first block, both hybrids showed a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1577 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat protein yield without adaptations is projected to decrease .
Treatmentwithout adaptations e3 Verbatim
t0 “Responses of Wheat Protein Content and Protein Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 e3 “Wheat PY with adaptations will increase, while that without adaptations will decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–990 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.