View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Relay cropping chili and watermelon showed no decrease in yield .
Verbatim
e0 “The relay cropping of chili and watermelon plants was effective simultaneously, and there was no decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1590 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree canopy cover within fields tended to decrease crop yield .
Settinginside the fields e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “tree canopy cover and tree density inside the fields tended to decrease crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–736 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -13.9% in the 1980s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -15.4% in the 1990s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -9.1% in the 2000s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -7.3% in the 2010s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Disease progress curve area was significantly correlated with sugar beet yield decrease .
Qualifierarea under the disease progress curve values (AUDPC) e0 Settingdisease progress curve e0 Verbatim
e0 “The area under the disease progress curve values (AUDPC) was significantly correlated with yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1349 t0 “sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought produced the highest yield decrease at this grass site.
Verbatim
e1 “In case of drought there was the highest yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1156 e2 “grass type formed on the Little Cumania lowland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1083 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UA4805 showed a significant yield decrease in 2023 due to stink bug damage.
Interactorstink bug e1 pest Verbatim
e0 “A new soybean cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 e1 “a significant yield decrease in ‘UA4805’ in 2023 due to stink bug damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–664 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.