View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha
decrease in tilling depth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha, chickpea - by 0.53 t/ha, compared with the option of alternating plowing and loosening in crop rotation Intervention effect With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha Intervention effect The lowest yield in the experiment was noted without basic tillage Observation The best results after plowing at 20-22 cm were due to the highest yield, as well as the highest mass of 1000 grains, the yield of fodder and grain units in this variant Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
M1 and M2 retained ear weight and grain yield per plant without notable decrease .
ear weight and grain yield per plant e0 did not notably decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The ear weight and grain yield per plant of M1 and M2 did not notably decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3196–3274 t0 “maize breeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar peptide fertilizers caused no fresh shoot yield change or a slight decrease with Zn-peptide.
Zn-peptide treatment e0 fresh shoot yield e0 slight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 e0 “foliar treatments with peptides-based fertilizers induced no fresh shoot yield variations or a slight decrease in the case of Zn-peptide treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–574 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping with either cover species did not decrease maize yield and agronomic performance relative to sole maize.
intercropping systems e0 maize yield and agronomic performance e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The intercropping systems did not decrease the maize yield and agronomic performance, if compared to the single crop, regardless of the evaluated species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–842 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The infected Brusviana variety had a 58.5% yield decrease .
Brusviana variety e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “raspberry cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 e0 “from 58.5% (Brusviana variety) to 62.1% (Joan Jay variety) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–745 e1 “RBDV infection caused yield decrease by an average of 60.8% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–685 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The fall 2022 yield decrease is likely due to sub-optimal low temperatures during pod development.
decrease in yield in fall, 2022 e4 sub-optimal low temperatures during pod development e4 Verbatim
t0 “snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–94 e4 “with the decrease in yield in fall, 2022 likely due to sub-optimal low temperatures during pod development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1701 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
If POD7 is increased by 1 mmol⋅O3 ⋅m−2, the simulated yield of winter wheat is projected to decrease by 6.5%.
POD7 is increased by 1 mmol⋅O3 ⋅m−2 e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e4 “If POD7 is increased by 1 mmol⋅O3 ⋅m−2, the yield of winter wheat will decrease by 6.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1187 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect Under high sensitivity effect, the 150 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 72% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under high sensitivity effect, the 100 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 36% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under high sensitivity effect, the 50 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 6% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under low sensitivity effect, the 150 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 13% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under low sensitivity effect, the 100 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 6% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under low sensitivity effect, the 50 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 1% in winter wheat. Observation The control group (CK, ambient air) had a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 10% in winter wheat under high sensitivity effect. Observation The control group (CK, ambient air) had a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 2% in winter wheat under low sensitivity effect. Association Cumulative stomatal O3 absorption flux (PODY) of winter wheat, with threshold Y of 7 nmol⋅ (m2⋅s)−1, had the highest correlation with relative yields. Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CMS cytoplasm influenced an insignificant decrease in average yield in 7 of the 10 hybrids tested.
7 of the 10 hybrids tested e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cytoplasmic male sterility is important for seed production of maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–201 e2 “In 7 of the 10 hybrids tested, CMS cytoplasm influenced the insignificant decrease in average yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–943 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Residual rice yield declined during 2016-2018, consistent with a soil moisture decrease .
residual rice yield e0 decrease in soil moisture e0 2016-2018 period e0 Verbatim
e0 “During the 2016-2018 period, there existed a reduction in the residual rice yield that was consistent with a decrease in soil moisture during the same time period. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1599 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Application of living mulches (especially Trifolium repens ) caused a non-significant decrease in eggplant fruit yield .
application of living mulches (especially Trifolium repens L.) e2 eggplant fruit yield e2 Verbatim
e2 “The greater eggplant fruit yield was obtained from vegetable grown without companion plants. The application of living mulches (especially Trifolium repens L.) caused a non-significant decrease in eggplant fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1240 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Zea mays
Lactuca sativa
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Solanum melongena