Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One to three large alfalfa weevil larvae often caused a significant decrease in alfalfa yield.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae1pest
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
one to three large larvaee2

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28
e1

“The alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Gylenhall)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–184
e2

“one to three large larvae often cause a significant decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–822

Title

Re-evaluating the Economic Injury Level for Alfalfa Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Control in Low Desert Irrigated Alfalfa

K Harrington; Y Carrière; A M Mostafa Journal of Economic Entomology 2021. doi:10.1093/jee/toab070

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overexpression lines of OsMYBS1 showed no decrease in total grain yield per plant in rice.

Treatment
overexpression linese2
Outcome
total grain yield per plante2
Direction
without a decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“agronomic performance in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99
e2

“overexpression lines produced more tillers and panicles, with a reduced seed-setting rate but without a decrease in total grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–810

Title

Overexpression of OsMYBS1 affect leaf morphology, photosynthesis, and agronomic performance in rice

Yinhua Ma; Jing Zhang; Kai Liang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1653514

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% reduction of plant-available N would decrease crop yield by 17%.

Taxon
crope6
Treatment
reduction of plant-available N by 50%e6
Outcome
crop yielde6
Direction
decreasee6
Value
17%e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“a reduction of plant-available N by 50% would lead to a decrease in crop yield by 17% and a concomitant increase in N response efficiency by 67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1267

Title

Nutrient saturation of crop monocultures and agroforestry indicated by nutrient response efficiency

Marcus Schmidt; Marife D. Corre; Bomin Kim; et al. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 2020. doi:10.1007/s10705-020-10113-6

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing harvested area by 10 hectares was forecast to decrease yield by 0.01 tons per hectare.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
increasing area harvested by 10 hectarese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.01 tons per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing area harvested by 10 hectares that would decrease the yield by 0.01 tons per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1207
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27

Title

Trend Analysis in Sugarcane Growth in Mumias Sugar Belt, Western Kenya; for the Period 1985-2015

Protas Fwamba Khaemba; Philomena W. Muiruri; Thomas N. Kibutu Interdisciplinary Journal of Rural and Community Studies 2021. doi:10.51986/ijrcs-2021.vol3.01.04

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield decreases by more than 40 % when protective measures decrease by 30 %.

Taxon
grain cropse0
Treatment
decrease of 30 % in the volume of protective measurese0
Outcome
yield of grain cropse0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
more than 40 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of grain crops decreases by more than 40 % with a decrease of 30 % in the volume of protective measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039

Title

Current trends in the use of plant protection products for irrigated agriculture

Irina Aleksandrovna Kostovarova; Sergey Konstantinovich Kostovarov Ekologiya i stroitelstvo 2022. doi:10.35688/2413-8452-2022-02-002

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rainfall deficit during flowering and pod formation contributed to the decrease in sweet lupine yield.

Taxon
SWEET LUPINEt0
Treatment
rainfall deficite4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
decreasee4
Qualifier
during the period of flowering-pod formatione4

Verbatim

e4

“The rainfall deficit during the period of flowering-pod formation, calendrically the first half of June - the first half of August, also contributes to the decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1077
t0

“SWEET LUPINE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61

Title

RESEARCHES ON THE INFLUENCE OF SOWING DENSITY ON SWEET LUPINE YIELD

Romina SABAU; Felicia CHETAN; Alina SIMON; et al. LIFE SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2022. doi:10.58509/lssd.v3i2.209

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high rate of N fertilizer can decrease soybean yield under no-drought conditions.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
high rate of N-fertilizere4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
decreasee4
Qualifier
under no-drought conditionse4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the seed protein and oil concentrations of two soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–739
e4

“It was concluded that high rate of N-fertilizer can decrease the yield of both cultivars under no-drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1389

Title

Yield and Quality of Two Soybean Cultivars in Response to Drought and N Fertilization

Oqba BASAL; András SZABÓ Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 2020. doi:10.33462/jotaf.628563

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yield starts to decrease beyond a critical threshold of anthropogenic CO2 emissions.

Taxon
staple food cropse0
Treatment
anthropogenic CO2 emissionse1
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
starts to decreasee1
Qualifier
critical thresholde1

Verbatim

e0

“impact the yields of essential staple food crops significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–296
e1

“Our findings reveal a critical threshold for anthropogenic CO2 emissions, beyond which the crop yield starts to decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–961

Title

Impact of elevated carbon dioxide and temperature on crop yield: A study of autonomous and nonautonomous systems

Akash Yadav; Anjali Jha; A. K. Misra Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 2024. doi:10.1063/5.0225698

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulbous bluegrass did not decrease maize grain yield relative to no groundcover.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
BBGe0
Interactor
P. bulbosa L.Poa bulbosae2weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no decreasee0
Comparator
Controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The BBG treatment, however, showed little change in soil moisture and no decrease in grain yield relative to the Control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1447
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–243
e2

“bulbous bluegrass (BBG; P. bulbosa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–661

Title

Summer‐dormant, perennial groundcover has minimal effect on plant‐available nutrients and no effect on maize yield

P. D. Galland; C. R. Dutter; A. Chen; et al. Agronomy Journal 2026. doi:10.1002/agj2.70333

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Global maize yield was projected to decrease 15.01% to 17.14% under 2.0 K warming.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
2.0 Ke0
Outcome
global maize yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
−15.01% to −17.14%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Under 1.5 and 2.0 K warming scenarios, global maize yield is projected to decrease by −10.16% to −11.91% and −15.01% to −17.14%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1391

Title

Compounding precipitation effect in modulating maize yield response to global warming

Yunyun Ban; Guoyong Leng; Qiuhong Tang International Journal of Climatology 2022. doi:10.1002/joc.7652

Other claims from this paper (11)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.