Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decrease with emergence date followed a quadratic or linear trend in each growing season.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
emergence datee7
Outcome
Yield decreasee7
Direction
decreasee7

Verbatim

e0

“seedling emergence uniformity in corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–63
e7

“Yield decrease as a function of emergence date followed either a quadratic or linear trend in each growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1887

Title

Single-Plant Grain Yield in Corn (Zea mays L.) Based on Emergence Date, Seed Size, Sowing Depth, and Plant to Plant Distance

Chad L. Kimmelshue; A. Susana Goggi; Kenneth J. Moore Crops 2022. doi:10.3390/crops2010006

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The capacity of Myc to increase yield was not enough to compensate for the yield decrease caused by reduced fertilization.

Taxon
cereale5
Treatment
reduced fertilizatione7
Outcome
yield decreasee7
Direction
decreasee7

Verbatim

e7

“In this experiment, the Myc’s capacity to increase yield was not enough to compensate for the yield decrease caused by reduced fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1591
e5

“very few data on wether mycorrhizal inoculants affect soil biological activity and cereal growth in temperate climates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–460

Title

Limited effect of mycorrhizal inoculation depending on soil type and fertilization level in a central European field trial

Nándor Prettl; Borbála Biró; Priyo Adi Nugroho; et al. Plant Growth Regulation 2024. doi:10.1007/s10725-024-01251-w

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
applying mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
grain yield decreasee0
Direction
compensatede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124

Title

Interaction Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) on Growth and Yield of Sunflower under Water Stress Conditions

Karami, Meysam; Kazemeini, Seyed Abdolreza; Zarei, Mehdi; et al. Journal of Crop production and processing 2020. doi:10.47176/jcpp.9.4.202711

Other claims from this paper (12)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of fulvic acid and Bacillus subtilis caused an antagonistic decrease in grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
grain yield decreasee4
Qualifier
An antagonism effect of the combination of FA and BSe4

Verbatim

e0

“during the maize cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–345
e4

“An antagonism effect of the combination of FA and BS induced a grain yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–785

Title

Coastal Soil Salinity Amelioration and Crop Yield Improvement by Biomaterial Addition in East China

Yunpeng Sun; Xiaobing Chen; Jingsong Yang; et al. Water 2022. doi:10.3390/w14203266

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% under scenario A1.

Outcome
yield of mangoe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
92.53%e0
Qualifier
scenarios A1 and B1, respectivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105

Title

Modeling climate change impact on irrigation water requirement and yield of mango (Mangifera indica L.) in Egypt

arafat; Maklad Fundamental and applied agriculture 2021. doi:10.5455/faa.79789

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% under scenario B1.

Outcome
yield of mangoe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
85.73%e0
Qualifier
scenarios A1 and B1, respectivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105

Title

Modeling climate change impact on irrigation water requirement and yield of mango (Mangifera indica L.) in Egypt

arafat; Maklad Fundamental and applied agriculture 2021. doi:10.5455/faa.79789

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Industrial tomato yield did not decrease at salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1).

Taxon
industrial tomatoese0
Treatment
salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without any decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“industrial tomatoes could be grown in salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) without any decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1022

Title

THE EFFECT OF SALINE WATER APPLICATION ON TOMATO FRUIT YIELD AND SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS

Ahmet Turhan Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS 2020

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield enhancement coincided with a relative decrease in oat grain protein content of 11.3 to 12.4%.

Treatment
Yield enhancemente0
Outcome
protein content of oat grainse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
11.3 to 12.4 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield enhancement was accompanied by a relative decrease of protein content of oat grains ranging from 11.3 to 12.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–955

Title

Influence of mineral and modified fertilizers on oat yield

Galina Sajdiasheva; Alevtina Kulikova; Alexander Laschenkov; et al. BIO Web of Conferences 2020. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20201700151

Other claims from this paper (3)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in yield under W2 tended to become larger as truss position increased in 2018–2019.

Organ / stage
truss positione4
Outcome
the decreasee4
Direction
largere4

Verbatim

t0

“Regulation of tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26
e4

“the decrease tended to become larger as truss position increased in 2018–2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1175

Title

Regulation of tomato yield and fruit quality by alternate partial root-zone irrigation strongly depends on truss positions

Zhenzhu Yao; Xuemin Hou; Yu Wang; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2023. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108288

Other claims from this paper (10)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield decrease at Kanafar correlated with higher growing-season temperature (by 0.6 degrees C).

Taxon
Cabernet Sauvignont0
Treatment
higher temperature during the growing seasone1
Outcome
decrease in yielde1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
0.6 °Ce1
Setting
Kanafare1

Verbatim

t0

“Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–29
e1

“the decrease in yield at Kanafar correlated with higher temperature during the growing season (by 0.6 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1355

Title

Changes in Cabernet Sauvignon yield and berry quality as affected by variability in weather conditions in the last two decades in Lebanon

G. Ghantous; K. Popov; Z. El Sebaaly; et al. Scientific Reports 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-57665-z

Other claims from this paper (15)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.