View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Tolerant varieties had a lesser yield decrease under salt stress.
tolerant varieties e0 Verbatim
e0 “a lesser decrease was observed in tolerant varieties. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1320 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of panicles with four leaves caused an even more significant decrease in yield .
removal of panicles with four leaves e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “seed maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–38 e0 “an even more significant decrease in yield was determined with treatment removal of panicles with four leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1346 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
biological efficiency and yield indicators e3 without a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nongda 108 maize yield did not decrease under recommended nicosulfuron.
did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of the sensitive maize variety (Ditian 8) decrease d by 37.09%, whereas that of the resistant maize variety (Nongda 108) did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1170 t0 “nicosulfuron ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Hardy, P with biofertilizers practically did not decrease barley yield .
drug Hardy, P with biofertilizers e0 practically does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “with the combined use of the drug Hardy, P with biofertilizers, the yield of barley practically does not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–753 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Turmeric growth, yield attributes and yield tended to decrease with pressmud levels beyond 20 t per ha.
higher levels of pressmud beyond 20 t pressmud ha-1 e0 growth, yield attributes and yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The growth, yield attributes and yield of turmeric rhizomes tended to decrease with higher levels of pressmud beyond 20 t pressmud ha-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1015 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Pressmud at 20 t per ha with RDF gave the highest turmeric plant height, 97.4 cm. Intervention effect Pressmud at 20 t per ha with RDF gave the maximum turmeric leaf length, 49.4 cm. Intervention effect Pressmud at 20 t per ha with RDF gave the highest turmeric leaf breadth, 12.9 cm. Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha produced the highest number of rhizomes per plant, 21.5. Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha produced the maximum fresh rhizome weight per plant, 310.3 g. Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha produced the highest fresh rhizome yield, 34.5 t per ha. Intervention effect The yield increment with RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha was 22.7% over the control (RDF only). Intervention effect Turmeric responded significantly to pressmud application compared with the control. Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha gave the maximum net return, Rs. 4,78,757 per ha, versus Rs. 3,54,677 per ha for the control. Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha gave the highest B:C ratio, 2.95, versus 2.51 for the control. Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain yield may decrease in the 2030s and 2050s under both RCP scenarios.
sorghum grain yield e0 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios e0 Verbatim
e0 “sorghum grain yield may decrease by 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2523–2600 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource Calibration RMSE was 2 days for anthesis, 2 days for maturity, 478 kg ha −1 for grain yield and 912 kg ha −1 for biomass yield. Method / resource Calibration normalized nRMSE values were 2.74%, 1.6%, 13.42% and 5.91% respectively. Method / resource Evaluation R2 values were 78% for anthesis, 99% for maturity, 98% for biomass yield and 94% for grain yield. Method / resource Evaluation d-statistics were 0.87, 0.91, 0.67 and 0.98. Method / resource Evaluation nRMSE values were 2.6%, 2.7%, 23.4% and 4.1% for the respective parameters. Method / resource The model had a strong fit between simulated and observed values. Intervention effect Optimum nitrogen fertilizer may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Early sowing may substantially increase sorghum yield. Recommendation Suitable crop management could reduce the adverse impact of projected climate change on sorghum production. Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid use sometimes causes growth retardation, sterility and yield decrease .
growth retardation, sterility, and yield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the use of SA in some cases may lead to negative results – growth retardation, sterility, and yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2241–2349 t0 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 t1 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Short-term conservation tillage did not significantly decrease corn yield .
short-term implementation of conservation tillage e0 did not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the short-term implementation of conservation tillage did not result in a significant decrease in corn yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2029 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Microgreen yield did not decrease under the intermittent lighting schedule.
Intermittent LED lighting t0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the same time, the yield does not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–444 t0 “Intermittent LED lighting helps reduce energy costs when growing microgreens on vertical controlled environment farms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Zea mays
Vitis.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare_W_IMG_2440.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Curcuma longa
Sorghum
Zea mays subsp. mays