Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield.

Taxon: grapest0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“decrease yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167

t0
“vineyards and grapes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91

Title

The damages and significant effects of wildfire and stubble burning on vineyards and grapes

Selda Daler Silva Balcanica 2024. doi:10.3897/silvabalcanica.25.e132176

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Wildfires and stubble burning can physically and radiantly damage vineyards.
Observation Fire can damage vineyard leaves, shoots, buds, and fruit production organs and can destroy vineyards in extreme cases.
Association Fire damage extent differs among vineyards with weather, fire intensity, and grapevine growth stage.
Observation Smoke can harm vineyards and alter grape-berry chemical composition.
Observation Smoke exposure can induce necrotic leaf lesions.
Observation Smoke exposure can hinder photosynthesis.
Observation Smoke exposure can reduce sugar accumulation in fruit.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Future grain yield was projected to decrease.

Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: in futuree0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“the grain yield would decrease in future”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1020

Title

Grain yield and food security evaluation in the yellow river basin under climate change and water resources constraints

Chen Niu; Yafei Qi; Aijun Guo; et al. Frontiers in Water 2022. doi:10.3389/frwa.2022.908945

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource The coupled models showed good adaptability.
Observation Future Yellow River Basin precipitation and temperature were projected to exceed historical levels and rise.
Observation Future basin runoff and irrigation water demand were projected below historical levels.
Observation The basin was projected to have well-guaranteed food security.
Observation Food security levels were projected to differ substantially among provinces.
Observation Some provinces were projected to face serious food insecurity without grain trade.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

These combinations did not significantly decrease yield.

Taxon: grapet0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“without a significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025

t0
“Isabella grape variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510

Title

Impact of combination application of herbicides and mineral fertilizers on the chemical composition of must and wine

Madina B. Khokonova Izvestiya of Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V M Kokov 2022. doi:10.55196/2411-3492-2022-3-37-26-30

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Combined herbicides and fertilizers generally left must sugar at control level.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with simazine increased wort sugar.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with atrazine increased wort sugar.
Observation Wort titratable acids did not differ significantly.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NP slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NRK slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Observation Coloring substances and total phenols tended to increase in all variants.
Observation Simazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation Atrazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation These herbicides and fertilizers did not negatively affect wine organoleptic properties.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lara showed a statistically insignificant straw yield decrease.

Material: Larae0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“The Lara variety showed an insignificant decrease in the straw yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1207

Title

Features of forming the productivity of modern hemp varieties using organic cultivation technology

Andriy Pylypchenko; Mykola Marenych; Volodymyr Hanhur; et al. Scientific Horizons 2023. doi:10.48077/scihor7.2023.54

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased crop productivity overall.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Hliana straw yield by 0.07-0.11 t/ha, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Hloba straw yield within the stated 0.07-0.11 t/ha range, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Zolotoniski 15 straw yield by 0.14 t/ha.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Sula straw yield by 0.14 t/ha.
Observation Lara had the best fibre-yield suitability for organic cultivation.

Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Abiotic assaults decrease plant yield.

Taxon: PlantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment: abiotic assaultse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Plants are exposed continuously in their natural environment to diverse abiotic assaults throughout life, which leads to a decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140

Title

Influence of abiotic stress on biomolecules

K.Ye. Zhanassova; A.B. Kurmanbayeva; Zh.K. Masalimov BULLETIN of the L N Gumilyov Eurasian National University BIOSCIENCE Series 2021. doi:10.32523/2616-7034-2021-137-4-92-104

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mycotoxins of phytopathogenic fungi lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of grain.

Compound: Mycotoxinse0
Outcome: yield and quality of graine0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Mycotoxins lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1220

Title

The main mechanisms of environmentalization of the agricultural production

L. Havryliuk; I. Beznosko; O. Kichigina Balanced nature using 2023. doi:10.33730/2310-4678.3.2023.287828

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023 there was a decrease in yield compared with near-normal precipitation in 2021.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

e1
“there was a decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1322

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39

Title

Cover crops did not change optimal corn nitrogen rate over three variable precipitation seasons in the Western Corn Belt

Tauana Ferreira de Almeida; Lucas Pecci Canisares; Emily Robinson; et al. Agronomy Journal 2025. doi:10.1002/agj2.70129

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Cover crops did not decrease corn grain yield at the AONR.
Intervention effect Cover crops did not increase the AONR compared with the no-cover crop treatment.
Observation In 2021, with near-normal precipitation, corn yield at the AONR and the AONR were the highest of the three years.
Observation In 2022, with about half the 30-year average rainfall, yield at the AONR decreased across treatments.
Intervention effect In 2023, cover crop treatments had no significant effect on the AONR.
Mechanism Weather was the dominant factor driving the AONR.
Recommendation The results do not support the need for higher N rates after winter cover crops.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The largest projected alfalfa yield decrease is 9% in Siirt.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 9%e0
Setting: Siirte0

Verbatim

e0
“the maximum yield decrease will be noted in Siirt (9%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1728

e1
“Alfalfa yield for years 2020-2060”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1052

Title

Estimation of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa l.) yield under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climate change projections with ANN in Turkey

MuhammetAli Pekin; NurdanSahin Demirbag; KhalidMahmood Khawar; et al. MAUSAM 2023. doi:10.54302/mausam.v74i3.5598

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource The ANN calculated alfalfa yield with a coefficient of determination of 0.827.
Method / resource The ANN calculated alfalfa yield with a Nash-Sutcliff coefficient of 0.813.
Association Projected alfalfa yield increases where precipitation increases.
Association Projected alfalfa yield decreases where precipitation decreases.
Observation The largest projected alfalfa yield increase is 6% in Artvin.

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disease causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield.

Taxon: TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome: tobacco leaf yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

t0
“Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–75

e1
“The disease spreads widely and causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3314–3384

Title

First Report of Pestalotiopsis trachycarpicola Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco in China

Weili Gang; Weijun Sang; Yi Cao; et al. Plant Disease 2025. doi:10.1094/pdis-05-25-1076-pdn

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reasons for the decrease in barley yield under permanent sowing were identified.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree5
Outcome: decrease in the yield of permanent sowing of barleye5

Verbatim

e5
“The reasons for the decrease in the yield of permanent sowing of barley have been identified”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1731

Title

The impact of abiotic and key environmental factors on barley yield

Dmitry Vladmirovich Mitrofanov The Agrarian Scientific Journal 2023. doi:10.28983/asj.y2023i9pp15-21

Other claims from this paper (5)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics