View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
Treatmentincrease or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
Treatment1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater shade tended to decrease grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The shade levels tend to decrease grain yield and increase unfilled grain. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–741 t0 “upland rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Under low plant density the overall soybean yield may slightly decrease .
TreatmentLow plant density e3 Qualifiermay slightly decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 e3 “Low plant density helps improve individual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency, although the overall yield may slightly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–421 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield .
Treatmenttree enrichment e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–818 t0 “oil palm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–61 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined drought and heat gave the largest tuber yield decrease .
Directionlargest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The largest decrease was recorded in the case of applying both stresses simultaneously ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–998 t0 “potato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–40 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Keeping available water depletion below 25% produced no significant crop- yield decrease .
Treatmentmaintaining AWC depletion below 25% e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining AWC depletion below 25% resulted in no significant decrease in crop yield and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2257 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain corn yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Winter wheat yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.