Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6,914 matchesgrouped into 3,570 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1,145 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 31 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 23.19%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 7.78%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling rate (AGFR)e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 13.97%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Show all 18 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimuline0
Outcome: number of weedse0
Direction: no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: PGR Zeastimuline4
Outcome: above-ground air-dry mass of weed plantse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“only a slight decrease in the above-ground air-dry mass of weed plants was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1848

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: Stellar herbicidee3
Outcome: weed numberse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 97,0%e0
Qualifier: seconde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in weed numbers was 93,5% during the first survey, 97,0% during the second and 97,9% during the third.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1619

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas 18

Show all 18 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF40 significantly increased yield by 13.9% compared with RF60.

Taxon: Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: RF40e4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: increasede4
Value: 13.9%e4
Comparator: RF60e4

Verbatim

e4
“Among the three RF treatments, RF40 and RF80 significantly increased the yield by 13.9% and 17.2%, respectively, compared with RF60”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1315

t0
“Increase Winter Wheat Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97

Title

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas

Xiaoli Liu; Yandong Wang; Xiaolong Ren; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081815

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting raised furrow soil temperature compared with flat planting.
Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting promoted soil moisture in the furrows during the vegetative period compared with flat planting.
Association Soil temperature of the furrows slightly increased with furrow width.
Association Soil moisture obviously decreased under the three RF practices.
Intervention effect In a wet year, FP significantly increased winter wheat yield by 43.6% compared with RF.
Intervention effect In a normal year, RF gave higher winter wheat yield than FP, the opposite of the wet year.
Intervention effect RF80 significantly increased yield by 17.2% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect All RF treatments increased the flux of N2O and CO2 emissions compared with FP.
Intervention effect All RF treatments reduced CH4 absorption compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 99.6% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 53.4% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 31.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 55.8% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 45.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 0.7% compared with FP.
Recommendation Conventional flat planting in wet years is recommended to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.
Recommendation A ridge-furrow ratio of 40:71 cm is recommended in normal years to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF80 significantly increased yield by 17.2% compared with RF60.

Taxon: Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: RF80e4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: increasede4
Value: 17.2%e4
Comparator: RF60e4

Verbatim

e4
“Among the three RF treatments, RF40 and RF80 significantly increased the yield by 13.9% and 17.2%, respectively, compared with RF60”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1315

t0
“Increase Winter Wheat Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97

Title

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas

Xiaoli Liu; Yandong Wang; Xiaolong Ren; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081815

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting raised furrow soil temperature compared with flat planting.
Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting promoted soil moisture in the furrows during the vegetative period compared with flat planting.
Association Soil temperature of the furrows slightly increased with furrow width.
Association Soil moisture obviously decreased under the three RF practices.
Intervention effect In a wet year, FP significantly increased winter wheat yield by 43.6% compared with RF.
Intervention effect In a normal year, RF gave higher winter wheat yield than FP, the opposite of the wet year.
Intervention effect RF40 significantly increased yield by 13.9% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect All RF treatments increased the flux of N2O and CO2 emissions compared with FP.
Intervention effect All RF treatments reduced CH4 absorption compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 99.6% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 53.4% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 31.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 55.8% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 45.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 0.7% compared with FP.
Recommendation Conventional flat planting in wet years is recommended to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.
Recommendation A ridge-furrow ratio of 40:71 cm is recommended in normal years to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a wet year, FP significantly increased winter wheat yield by 43.6% compared with RF.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment: FPe3
Outcome: winter wheat yielde3
Direction: increasede3
Value: 43.6%e3
Comparator: RFe3
Setting: wet year (2017–2018)e3

Verbatim

e3
“In a wet year (2017–2018), FP significantly increased the winter wheat yield (43.6%) compared with RF, while the opposite was the case in a normal year (2018–2019)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1182

t0
“Increase Winter Wheat Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97

Title

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas

Xiaoli Liu; Yandong Wang; Xiaolong Ren; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081815

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting raised furrow soil temperature compared with flat planting.
Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting promoted soil moisture in the furrows during the vegetative period compared with flat planting.
Association Soil temperature of the furrows slightly increased with furrow width.
Association Soil moisture obviously decreased under the three RF practices.
Intervention effect In a normal year, RF gave higher winter wheat yield than FP, the opposite of the wet year.
Intervention effect RF40 significantly increased yield by 13.9% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect RF80 significantly increased yield by 17.2% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect All RF treatments increased the flux of N2O and CO2 emissions compared with FP.
Intervention effect All RF treatments reduced CH4 absorption compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 99.6% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 53.4% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 31.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 55.8% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 45.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 0.7% compared with FP.
Recommendation Conventional flat planting in wet years is recommended to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.
Recommendation A ridge-furrow ratio of 40:71 cm is recommended in normal years to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat 17

Show all 17 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Treatment: T growthe0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: decrease in photosynthesise0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Direction: decreasee0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Observation The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Material: genotypese0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: decrease in photosynthesise0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Direction: similare0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“was similar between genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1426

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Association The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Treatment: droughte0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yielde0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Qualifier: alternative electron transporte0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“but more to alternative electron transport”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1583

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Association The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Observation The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: wheat yielde0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 10.2 hwt ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: spring wheat grain concentration of leade0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 14.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: spring wheat grain concentration of lead and cadmiume0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 16.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.

The harmfulness of weeds in the herbage of perennial grasses in the north-west of the Russian Federation 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective measures reduced green mass yield losses 1.9 times in first-year grasses.

Taxon: perennial grassese0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Outcome: yield losses of green masse0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Value: 1.9e0 e1 e2 e3 t0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the yield losses of green mass — by 2.6 and 10.7 times, 1.9 and 8.9 times, respectively, on grasses of the 1st and 2nd years of use.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1860

e1
“Yield losses from the total value of the raw phytomass of weeds amounted to 15.75 c/ha (5.3%) and 2.51 c/ha (1%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1139

e2
“Under the influence of mineral fertilizers, the hazard coefficients decreased by 2.6 and 5.7 times”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1666

e3
“The introduction of high doses of mineral fertilizers and the use of herbicides in the integrated crop protection system of grain-grass-row crop rotation led to a decrease in the harmfulness of weeds.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1427

t0
“perennial grasses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60

Title

The harmfulness of weeds in the herbage of perennial grasses in the north-west of the Russian Federation

A. M. Shpanev Agrarian science 2024. doi:10.32634/0869-8155-2024-381-4-85-88

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Weeds harmed first-year perennial grasses 6.3 times more than second-year grasses.
Observation Weed-associated yield loss was 15.75 c/ha (5.3%) in first-year grasses.
Observation Weed-associated yield loss was 2.51 c/ha (1%) in second-year grasses.
Observation Yield loss per unit weed biomass was 0.150 c/ha (0.05%) for first-year grasses.
Observation Yield loss per unit weed biomass was 0.07 c/ha (0.03%) for second-year grasses.
Intervention effect High mineral fertilizer doses reduced weed harmfulness.
Intervention effect Herbicide use reduced weed harmfulness.
Observation Treatment effects were stronger in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced hazard coefficients 2.6 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced hazard coefficients 5.7 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced hazard coefficients 1.4 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced hazard coefficients 4.2 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced green mass yield losses 2.6 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced green mass yield losses 10.7 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced green mass yield losses 8.9 times in second-year grasses.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers reduced green mass yield losses 10.7 times in second-year grasses.

Taxon: perennial grassese0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Outcome: yield losses of green masse0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Value: 10.7 timese0 e1 e2 e3 t0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the yield losses of green mass — by 2.6 and 10.7 times, 1.9 and 8.9 times, respectively, on grasses of the 1st and 2nd years of use.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1860

e1
“Yield losses from the total value of the raw phytomass of weeds amounted to 15.75 c/ha (5.3%) and 2.51 c/ha (1%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1139

e2
“Under the influence of mineral fertilizers, the hazard coefficients decreased by 2.6 and 5.7 times”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1666

e3
“The introduction of high doses of mineral fertilizers and the use of herbicides in the integrated crop protection system of grain-grass-row crop rotation led to a decrease in the harmfulness of weeds.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1427

t0
“perennial grasses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60

Title

The harmfulness of weeds in the herbage of perennial grasses in the north-west of the Russian Federation

A. M. Shpanev Agrarian science 2024. doi:10.32634/0869-8155-2024-381-4-85-88

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Weeds harmed first-year perennial grasses 6.3 times more than second-year grasses.
Observation Weed-associated yield loss was 15.75 c/ha (5.3%) in first-year grasses.
Observation Weed-associated yield loss was 2.51 c/ha (1%) in second-year grasses.
Observation Yield loss per unit weed biomass was 0.150 c/ha (0.05%) for first-year grasses.
Observation Yield loss per unit weed biomass was 0.07 c/ha (0.03%) for second-year grasses.
Intervention effect High mineral fertilizer doses reduced weed harmfulness.
Intervention effect Herbicide use reduced weed harmfulness.
Observation Treatment effects were stronger in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced hazard coefficients 2.6 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced hazard coefficients 5.7 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced hazard coefficients 1.4 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced hazard coefficients 4.2 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced green mass yield losses 2.6 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced green mass yield losses 1.9 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced green mass yield losses 8.9 times in second-year grasses.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective measures reduced green mass yield losses 8.9 times in second-year grasses.

Taxon: perennial grassese0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Outcome: yield losses of green masse0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 e1 e2 e3 t0
Value: 8.9 timese0 e1 e2 e3 t0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the yield losses of green mass — by 2.6 and 10.7 times, 1.9 and 8.9 times, respectively, on grasses of the 1st and 2nd years of use.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1860

e1
“Yield losses from the total value of the raw phytomass of weeds amounted to 15.75 c/ha (5.3%) and 2.51 c/ha (1%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1139

e2
“Under the influence of mineral fertilizers, the hazard coefficients decreased by 2.6 and 5.7 times”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1666

e3
“The introduction of high doses of mineral fertilizers and the use of herbicides in the integrated crop protection system of grain-grass-row crop rotation led to a decrease in the harmfulness of weeds.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1427

t0
“perennial grasses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60

Title

The harmfulness of weeds in the herbage of perennial grasses in the north-west of the Russian Federation

A. M. Shpanev Agrarian science 2024. doi:10.32634/0869-8155-2024-381-4-85-88

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Weeds harmed first-year perennial grasses 6.3 times more than second-year grasses.
Observation Weed-associated yield loss was 15.75 c/ha (5.3%) in first-year grasses.
Observation Weed-associated yield loss was 2.51 c/ha (1%) in second-year grasses.
Observation Yield loss per unit weed biomass was 0.150 c/ha (0.05%) for first-year grasses.
Observation Yield loss per unit weed biomass was 0.07 c/ha (0.03%) for second-year grasses.
Intervention effect High mineral fertilizer doses reduced weed harmfulness.
Intervention effect Herbicide use reduced weed harmfulness.
Observation Treatment effects were stronger in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced hazard coefficients 2.6 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced hazard coefficients 5.7 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced hazard coefficients 1.4 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced hazard coefficients 4.2 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced green mass yield losses 2.6 times in first-year grasses.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizers reduced green mass yield losses 10.7 times in second-year grasses.
Intervention effect Protective measures reduced green mass yield losses 1.9 times in first-year grasses.

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems 15

Show all 15 →

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: NTS is the best approach to increasing yield, soil and water conservation, resilience, and mitigation of agroecosystem capacitye0

Verbatim

e0
“We conclude that NTS is the best approach to increasing yield, soil and water conservation, resilience, and mitigation of agroecosystem capacity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2440–2584

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: root yield, aboveground biomass yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Optimizing an Organic Method of Sugar Beet Cultivation and Yield Gap Decrease in Northern Poland 15

Show all 15 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eliska gave the lowest yields.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
Material: Eliskae0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: loweste0

Verbatim

e0
“The lowest yields were obtained from the Eliska variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2220–2275

e1
“organic sugar beet growing (Beta vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–104

Title

Optimizing an Organic Method of Sugar Beet Cultivation and Yield Gap Decrease in Northern Poland

Józef Tyburski; Mirosław Nowakowski; Robert Nelke; et al. Agriculture 2024. doi:10.3390/agriculture14060937

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Both cultivation systems yielded sugar beet roots 25–30% above the Polish average.
Observation Root yields were higher at Płonne than at Bałcyny.
Observation White sugar yields were higher at Płonne than at Bałcyny.
Intervention effect Compost produced the lowest organic beet root yield at Bałcyny, 66.1 t per ha.
Intervention effect Compost produced the lowest organic beet root yield at Płonne, 78.13 t per ha.
Intervention effect FYM reduced the organic versus conventional root yield difference to 7.7% at Bałcyny.
Intervention effect FYM reduced the organic versus conventional root yield difference to 2.1% at Płonne.
Recommendation The authors found no need to convert cattle FYM to compost.
Intervention effect Bioilsa N 12.5 with Patentkali yielded 78.1 t of roots per ha at Bałcyny and narrowed the gap to 1.4%.
Intervention effect Bioilsa and Patentkali yielded 86.7 t of roots per ha at Płonne versus 85.6 t per ha for conventional beet.
Association Variety choice affected root and pure sugar yields in both farming systems.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Bałcyny increased organic root yield from 68.8 to 76.0 t per ha.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Bałcyny reduced the organic root yield gap from 10.1% to 2.2%.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Płonne reduced the organic-conventional root yield gap from 6.6% to 0.3%.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivation systems yielded sugar beet roots 25–30% above the Polish average.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Outcome: root yieldse0
Direction: exceedinge0
Value: 25–30%e0
Comparator: average yield in Polande0

Verbatim

e0
“High sugar beet root yields exceeding the average yield in Poland by 25–30% were obtained in both studies, both in conventional and organic cultivation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–838

Title

Optimizing an Organic Method of Sugar Beet Cultivation and Yield Gap Decrease in Northern Poland

Józef Tyburski; Mirosław Nowakowski; Robert Nelke; et al. Agriculture 2024. doi:10.3390/agriculture14060937

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Root yields were higher at Płonne than at Bałcyny.
Observation White sugar yields were higher at Płonne than at Bałcyny.
Intervention effect Compost produced the lowest organic beet root yield at Bałcyny, 66.1 t per ha.
Intervention effect Compost produced the lowest organic beet root yield at Płonne, 78.13 t per ha.
Intervention effect FYM reduced the organic versus conventional root yield difference to 7.7% at Bałcyny.
Intervention effect FYM reduced the organic versus conventional root yield difference to 2.1% at Płonne.
Recommendation The authors found no need to convert cattle FYM to compost.
Intervention effect Bioilsa N 12.5 with Patentkali yielded 78.1 t of roots per ha at Bałcyny and narrowed the gap to 1.4%.
Intervention effect Bioilsa and Patentkali yielded 86.7 t of roots per ha at Płonne versus 85.6 t per ha for conventional beet.
Association Variety choice affected root and pure sugar yields in both farming systems.
Observation Eliska gave the lowest yields.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Bałcyny increased organic root yield from 68.8 to 76.0 t per ha.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Bałcyny reduced the organic root yield gap from 10.1% to 2.2%.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Płonne reduced the organic-conventional root yield gap from 6.6% to 0.3%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Płonne reduced the organic-conventional root yield gap from 6.6% to 0.3%.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
Treatment: replacing the Eliska variety with Jampole0
Outcome: yield gap between organic and conventional rootse0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 0.3%e0
Qualifier: 6.6%e0
Comparator: Eliska varietye0
Setting: Płonnee0

Verbatim

e0
“At Płonne, replacing the Eliska variety with Jampol reduced the yield gap between organic and conventional roots from 6.6% to 0.3%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2448–2578

e1
“organic sugar beet growing (Beta vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–104

Title

Optimizing an Organic Method of Sugar Beet Cultivation and Yield Gap Decrease in Northern Poland

Józef Tyburski; Mirosław Nowakowski; Robert Nelke; et al. Agriculture 2024. doi:10.3390/agriculture14060937

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Both cultivation systems yielded sugar beet roots 25–30% above the Polish average.
Observation Root yields were higher at Płonne than at Bałcyny.
Observation White sugar yields were higher at Płonne than at Bałcyny.
Intervention effect Compost produced the lowest organic beet root yield at Bałcyny, 66.1 t per ha.
Intervention effect Compost produced the lowest organic beet root yield at Płonne, 78.13 t per ha.
Intervention effect FYM reduced the organic versus conventional root yield difference to 7.7% at Bałcyny.
Intervention effect FYM reduced the organic versus conventional root yield difference to 2.1% at Płonne.
Recommendation The authors found no need to convert cattle FYM to compost.
Intervention effect Bioilsa N 12.5 with Patentkali yielded 78.1 t of roots per ha at Bałcyny and narrowed the gap to 1.4%.
Intervention effect Bioilsa and Patentkali yielded 86.7 t of roots per ha at Płonne versus 85.6 t per ha for conventional beet.
Association Variety choice affected root and pure sugar yields in both farming systems.
Observation Eliska gave the lowest yields.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Bałcyny increased organic root yield from 68.8 to 76.0 t per ha.
Intervention effect Replacing Eliska with Jampol at Bałcyny reduced the organic root yield gap from 10.1% to 2.2%.

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maternal component disease prevalence decreased by 43.3–50% across castration forms.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: all forms of castratione0
Outcome: prevalencee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: –43.3-50%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in the prevalence (–43.3-50%) and the development of the disease from the control occurred with all forms of castration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1629

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33

Title

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization

L.M. Holyk; O.S. Levchenko; S.F. Ivashchenko Agriculture and plant sciences theory and practice 2025. doi:10.54651/agri.2025.02.11

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Under double Acanto+ and Biogel treatment, maternal UkPg 103 C had lower vesicular smut prevalence with manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.43% with manual castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.23% with mechanical castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –0.7% with without castration castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under without castration castration.
Observation Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence was lower by 40–50%.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with without castration castration.
Intervention effect Mechanical castration increased seed yield by 1.3 t/ha or 10.8% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Manual castration increased seed yield by 1.2 t/ha or 10.1% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Two treatments with Akanto+ and Biogel around castration gave the largest yield increase, 1.99 t/ha or 15.9%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maternal disease development decreased by –2.43% with manual castration relative to control.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: manuale0
Outcome: development of the diseaset1
Direction: decreaset1
Value: –2.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“all forms of castration (manual –2.43%, mechanical –2.23%, without castration –0.7%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1690

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33

t1
“The decrease in the prevalence (–43.3-50%) and the development of the disease from the control occurred”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1600

Title

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization

L.M. Holyk; O.S. Levchenko; S.F. Ivashchenko Agriculture and plant sciences theory and practice 2025. doi:10.54651/agri.2025.02.11

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Under double Acanto+ and Biogel treatment, maternal UkPg 103 C had lower vesicular smut prevalence with manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal component disease prevalence decreased by 43.3–50% across castration forms.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.23% with mechanical castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –0.7% with without castration castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under without castration castration.
Observation Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence was lower by 40–50%.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with without castration castration.
Intervention effect Mechanical castration increased seed yield by 1.3 t/ha or 10.8% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Manual castration increased seed yield by 1.2 t/ha or 10.1% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Two treatments with Akanto+ and Biogel around castration gave the largest yield increase, 1.99 t/ha or 15.9%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maternal disease development decreased by –2.23% with mechanical castration relative to control.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: mechanicale0
Outcome: development of the diseaset1
Direction: decreaset1
Value: –2.23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“all forms of castration (manual –2.43%, mechanical –2.23%, without castration –0.7%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1690

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33

t1
“The decrease in the prevalence (–43.3-50%) and the development of the disease from the control occurred”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1600

Title

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization

L.M. Holyk; O.S. Levchenko; S.F. Ivashchenko Agriculture and plant sciences theory and practice 2025. doi:10.54651/agri.2025.02.11

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Under double Acanto+ and Biogel treatment, maternal UkPg 103 C had lower vesicular smut prevalence with manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal component disease prevalence decreased by 43.3–50% across castration forms.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.43% with manual castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –0.7% with without castration castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under without castration castration.
Observation Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence was lower by 40–50%.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with without castration castration.
Intervention effect Mechanical castration increased seed yield by 1.3 t/ha or 10.8% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Manual castration increased seed yield by 1.2 t/ha or 10.1% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Two treatments with Akanto+ and Biogel around castration gave the largest yield increase, 1.99 t/ha or 15.9%.

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the authors’ experiment, spring crop mean yield also fell by 9.0%.

Taxon: soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barleye1
Treatment: ﬂat-cut looseninge2
Outcome: average yield of spring cropse0
Direction: decreasede0
Comparator: plowinge2

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“In our experience, the average yield of spring crops decreased by the same amount”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–606

e1
“soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–417

e2
“replacing the main processing of moldboard plowing with ﬂat-cut loosening”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–206

Title

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage

V. Yeshchenko; G. Koval; M. Kalievsky Agrobìologìâ 2021. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2021-163-1-49-58

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Replacing plowing with flat-cut loosening decreased mean yield across 15 crops by 9.0%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, arable-layer soil density changed by only 0.7%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, agronomically valuable soil structure content changed by only 0.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil density improved by 2.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil structure improved by 1.4%.
Intervention effect Flat-cut tillage decreased total arable-layer soil permeability by 1.9%, while it stayed acceptable.
Intervention effect Five of 15 publications reported lower root-layer available moisture after non-moldboard loosening.
Intervention effect The remaining 10 publications reported unchanged or increased available moisture.
Intervention effect Available soil moisture under flat-cut loosening was 1.7% higher than under plowing.
Intervention effect At mid-season, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.1% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect At season end, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.4% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect Crop-rotation productivity with flat-cut cultivation was significantly 9.0% lower than with plowing.
Intervention effect Crops had 27–31% higher weed infestation after moldboard-free autumn tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing plowing with flat-cut loosening decreased mean yield across 15 crops by 9.0%.

Taxon: soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barleye1
Treatment: ﬂat-cut looseninge2
Outcome: average yielde0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 9.0 %e0
Comparator: moldboard plowinge2

Verbatim

e0
“the average yield of 15 crops decreased by 9.0 % due to such replacement”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–523

e1
“soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–417

e2
“replacing the main processing of moldboard plowing with ﬂat-cut loosening”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–206

Title

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage

V. Yeshchenko; G. Koval; M. Kalievsky Agrobìologìâ 2021. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2021-163-1-49-58

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, spring crop mean yield also fell by 9.0%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, arable-layer soil density changed by only 0.7%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, agronomically valuable soil structure content changed by only 0.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil density improved by 2.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil structure improved by 1.4%.
Intervention effect Flat-cut tillage decreased total arable-layer soil permeability by 1.9%, while it stayed acceptable.
Intervention effect Five of 15 publications reported lower root-layer available moisture after non-moldboard loosening.
Intervention effect The remaining 10 publications reported unchanged or increased available moisture.
Intervention effect Available soil moisture under flat-cut loosening was 1.7% higher than under plowing.
Intervention effect At mid-season, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.1% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect At season end, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.4% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect Crop-rotation productivity with flat-cut cultivation was significantly 9.0% lower than with plowing.
Intervention effect Crops had 27–31% higher weed infestation after moldboard-free autumn tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across 15 experiments, agronomically valuable soil structure content changed by only 0.1%.

Taxon: soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barleye1
Treatment: ﬂat-cut cultivatione2
Outcome: content of agronomically valuable structurese0
Value: 0.1 %e0
Comparator: plowinge2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the content of agronomically valuable structures – only by 0.1 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1073

e1
“soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–417

e2
“ﬂat-cut cultivation instead of plowing”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–745

Title

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage

V. Yeshchenko; G. Koval; M. Kalievsky Agrobìologìâ 2021. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2021-163-1-49-58

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Replacing plowing with flat-cut loosening decreased mean yield across 15 crops by 9.0%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, spring crop mean yield also fell by 9.0%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, arable-layer soil density changed by only 0.7%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil density improved by 2.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil structure improved by 1.4%.
Intervention effect Flat-cut tillage decreased total arable-layer soil permeability by 1.9%, while it stayed acceptable.
Intervention effect Five of 15 publications reported lower root-layer available moisture after non-moldboard loosening.
Intervention effect The remaining 10 publications reported unchanged or increased available moisture.
Intervention effect Available soil moisture under flat-cut loosening was 1.7% higher than under plowing.
Intervention effect At mid-season, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.1% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect At season end, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.4% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect Crop-rotation productivity with flat-cut cultivation was significantly 9.0% lower than with plowing.
Intervention effect Crops had 27–31% higher weed infestation after moldboard-free autumn tillage.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas 18

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat 17

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain 15

The harmfulness of weeds in the herbage of perennial grasses in the north-west of the Russian Federation 15

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems 15

Optimizing an Organic Method of Sugar Beet Cultivation and Yield Gap Decrease in Northern Poland 15

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization 15

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage 14