View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater shade tended to decrease grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The shade levels tend to decrease grain yield and increase unfilled grain. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–741 t0 “upland rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
disease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The maize yield decrease from delayed emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones.
yield stability zones e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in maize yield caused by the delay in emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2129–2244 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each low-temperature day was associated with a 1% yield decrease .
low-temperature day e0 Verbatim
e0 “a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Future grain yield was projected to decrease .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the grain yield would decrease in future ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1020 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
These combinations did not significantly decrease yield .
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025 t0 “Isabella grape variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The primary reason for the yield decrease was increased wheat infestation by pathogens.
pathogens e3 pathogen Verbatim
e3 “The primary reason for yield decrease in a given growing season was increased wheat infestation by pathogens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–706 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed the grain yield decrease to fewer productive tillers per square metre.
COMMON WINTER WHEAT t0 productive tillers e0 Verbatim
t0 “COMMON WINTER WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–86 e0 “The main reason for the decrease in grain yield is the decrease in the number of productive tillers / m 2 . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1298 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease is attributed to a later planting date.
selection of a later planting date e4 Verbatim
e0 “on the yield of maize in the Azuero Region in Panama ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–168 e4 “yield decrease is related to the selection of a later planting date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1031 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer that managing the identified factors could decrease the soybean yield gap.
decrease the yield gap e0 Verbatim
e0 “managing magnitude of these variables will decrease the yield gap in soybean crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–932 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude prohexadione calcium can decrease vine growth and increase yield in virginia and runner peanut.
Prohexadione calcium e0 decrease vine growth and increase yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Prohexadione calcium can be beneficial in virginia market type and runner market type peanut cultivars to decrease vine growth and increase yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2121–2267 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Excessive shade was concluded to decrease cocoa yield .
excessive shade e0 Verbatim
e0 “excessive shade decrease s yield of cocoa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1913 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame seed yield began to decrease at a plant water stress index of 0.31.
threshold plant water stress index value e0 Verbatim
e0 “the threshold plant water stress index value, where sesame seed yield starts to decrease , was calculated as 0.31 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1680 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain- yield prediction accuracy.
prediction accuracy for grain yield e0 did not significantly decrease e0 whole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model accurately predicted reduced cucumber fruit yield under shading.
shading treatments e0 cucumber fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The model also accurately predicted the decrease in cucumber fruit yield under low-sunlight conditions (shading treatments) and the increase in yield due to supplemental lighting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1428 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.JPG?width=60)
Amaranthus caudatust0
Phaseolus vulgaris
Oryza sativa
Zea mays
Cicer arietinum
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
Arachis hypogaea
Theobroma cacao
Sesamum indicum
Cucumis sativus