View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
Treatmentincrease or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Future grain yield was projected to decrease .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the grain yield would decrease in future ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1020 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Abiotic assaults decrease plant yield .
Treatmentabiotic assaults e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants are exposed continuously in their natural environment to diverse abiotic assaults throughout life, which leads to a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each low-temperature day was associated with a 1% yield decrease .
Treatmentlow-temperature day e0 Verbatim
e0 “a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined drought and heat gave the largest tuber yield decrease .
Directionlargest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The largest decrease was recorded in the case of applying both stresses simultaneously ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–998 t0 “potato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–40 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
Comparatordisease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Mycotoxins of phytopathogenic fungi lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of grain.
Outcomeyield and quality of grain e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Mycotoxins lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1220 Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The disease causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield .
Outcometobacco leaf yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–75 e1 “The disease spreads widely and causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3314–3384 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
Comparatordisease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
These combinations did not significantly decrease yield .
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025 t0 “Isabella grape variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
Treatment1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maize yield with rising temperature could be attributed to a shorter crop duration.
Treatmentincrease in temperature e0 Qualifierdecrease in duration of the crop e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in maize yield due to increase in temperature could be attributed to decrease in duration of the crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1203 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in seed setting rate was the main contribution to the decrease in grain yield .
Qualifierdecrease in seed setting rate e7 Verbatim
t0 “elevated temperature effects on rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–158 e7 “The main contribution to the significant decrease of the grain yield s was the decrease in seed setting rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1476 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Knockout mutants had an average 4.88 g decrease in yield per plant.
MaterialKnockout mutants e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–159 e0 “Knockout mutants showed on an average 25.63% and 4.88 g decrease in SS and YPP, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1344 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Constitutive PrDA1-1 expression in Arabidopsis decrease yield .
Treatmentconstitutive expression e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PrDA1-1 was strongly expressed during both the early and late stages of seed development, and its constitutive expression in Arabidopsis reduced seed number but increased seed weight, which ultimately led to a decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–876 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain- yield prediction accuracy.
Outcomeprediction accuracy for grain yield e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Comparatorwhole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame seed yield began to decrease at a plant water stress index of 0.31.
Outcomethreshold plant water stress index value e0 Verbatim
e0 “the threshold plant water stress index value, where sesame seed yield starts to decrease , was calculated as 0.31 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1680 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain- yield prediction accuracy.
Outcomeprediction accuracy for grain yield e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Comparatorwhole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model accurately predicted reduced cucumber fruit yield under shading.
Treatmentshading treatments e0 Outcomecucumber fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The model also accurately predicted the decrease in cucumber fruit yield under low-sunlight conditions (shading treatments) and the increase in yield due to supplemental lighting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1428 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixture selection history decrease d yield variability only in monocultures.
Treatmentmixture selection history e0 Qualifieronly in monocultures e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a mixture selection history can increase yield productivity and decrease its variability, although only in monocultures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1002 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixture selection history decrease d yield variability only in monocultures.
Treatmentmixture selection history e0 Qualifieronly in monocultures e0 Verbatim
e0 “a mixture selection history can increase yield productivity and decrease its variability, although only in monocultures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1002 e1 “crop diversity experiment with seven species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–440 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixture selection history increased yield productivity only in monocultures.
Treatmentmixture selection history e0 Outcomeyield productivity e0 Qualifieronly in monocultures e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a mixture selection history can increase yield productivity and decrease its variability, although only in monocultures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1002 Other claims from this paper (3)
not stated 18 Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Total precipitation decrease d by 35–40% in May and August compared with normal.
Outcometotal decrease in precipitation e1 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 e1 “a total decrease in precipitation by 35–40% was recorded compared to the normal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall is projected to decrease in April and November.
QualifierApril and November e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Projected temperatures increased by up to 5.8% under SSP5-8.5, with rainfall decreasing in key months like April and November. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1112 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High water level trends declined significantly after 2011.
Outcomehigh water level trends e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “high water level trends decrease significantly after 2011 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–683 e1 “rice yield data analysis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–824 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.