View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
Treatmentapplication of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield , although marginal was statistically insignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not significantly decrease through the eight-day irrigation interval.
Comparatorcontinuous flooding (W) e1 Verbatim
e0 “without any significant decrease in yield up to 8W ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–955 t0 “RICE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 e1 “continuous flooding (W) without any significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–937 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The flour- yield decrease in Bayraktar 2000 was not significant.
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in flour yield was not significant for cv Bayraktar 2000 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–926 t0 “wheat kernel size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying all N to V9 did not significantly decrease corn yield .
TreatmentDelaying all the N to V9 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Corn yield following a delayed application of nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54 e0 “Delaying all the N to V9 did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1125 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High-rate controlled-release urea (HN) did not significantly decrease rice yield compared with conventional urea (FP).
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “As compared with FP, HN did not decrease rice yield significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–435 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying against late blight did not significantly decrease yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not significantly decrease neither occurrence of late blight or the yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–528 t0 “BIOPOTATOES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield .
Treatmentincreasing the density e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
Treatmentbasal 25% defoliation e0 OutcomeTDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cutting did not significantly decrease stock plant yield .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Importantly, stock plants showed no significant decrease in plant yield after cutting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1144 t0 “white potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–79 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DI and PRD did not significantly decrease yield .
Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “these treatments did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1556 t0 “lemon Fino 49 trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 e1 “DI and PRD decrease d stomatal conductance and photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1501 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.