View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying all N to V9 did not significantly decrease corn yield .
TreatmentDelaying all the N to V9 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Corn yield following a delayed application of nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54 e0 “Delaying all the N to V9 did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1125 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield .
Treatmentlow combined densities e0 Directiondo not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low combined densities do not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122 t0 “Brassica napus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
Treatmentinsect visits were reduced by 50% e0 Directionlittle decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High-rate controlled-release urea (HN) did not significantly decrease rice yield compared with conventional urea (FP).
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “As compared with FP, HN did not decrease rice yield significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–435 Other claims from this paper (7) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Minimum temperature is likely to decrease yield variability.
Treatmentminimum temperature e0 Outcomeyield variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “maximum temperature is risk-increasing for Aman rice while minimum temperature is likely to decrease yield variability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–640 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Local tarom was the most cold-sensitive variety, with 29% yield decrease .
Materiallocal tarom variety e0 Verbatim
e0 “the most sensitive one with most percentage of yield decrease (29%) was local tarom variety. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1639 t0 “Rice Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was associated with shorter growth duration together with increasing temperature.
Treatmentincreasing temperature e7 OutcomeDecrease in yield e7 Qualifierlowering growth duration e7 Verbatim
e0 “impact of climate change on rice production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–572 e7 “Decrease in yield were mainly associated with lowering growth duration along with increasing temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2256 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cluster pruning did not decrease total yield across cultivars.
Comparatorunpruned control e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in total yield , across all cultivars, between treatments and the unpruned control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2080 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease .
Treatmentcocoa/cassava combination e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
Treatmentinsect visits were reduced by 50% e0 Directionlittle decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.