View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Southern Finnish spring wheat faces a projected 30% probability of yield decrease owing to high temperature and drought.
high temperature and drought e0 southern Finland e0 Verbatim
e0 “in some areas of southern Finland, wheat production will face increasing risk of high temperature and drought, which can offset the benefits of climate change on wheat yield , resulting in an increase in yield variability and about 30% probability of yield decrease for spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1195 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Potassium deficiency can sharply decrease grain yield despite unobvious symptoms.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “K deficiency symptoms are usually not conspicuous although grain yield is abruptly decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2022 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
No nitrogen application decrease d simulated yield by 8%.
no N is applied e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “8% yield decrease when no N is applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3036–3074 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Straw returning decrease maize ET.
Straw returning e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Straw returning could decrease ET and increase the water use efficiency( WUE) and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–927 t0 “summer maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–104 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Straw returning significantly decreased soil evaporation, especially early. Observation Straw returning and water supply significantly affected water consumption, leaf water use efficiency, whole-period water use efficiency and yield. Observation Straw returning and water supply significantly affected photosynthetic parameters. Observation The straw returning and water supply interaction significantly affected photosynthetic parameters with an exception for net photosynthetic rate and yield. Intervention effect Straw returning increase maize water use efficiency( WUE). Intervention effect Straw returning increase maize yield. Association Increasing water supply increased maize Yield. Association Increasing water supply decreased maize WUE. Intervention effect At water supply level 1, straw returning increased maize WUE by 35. 32% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 2, straw returning increased maize WUE by 33. 74% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 3, straw returning increased maize WUE by 51. 88% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 4, straw returning increased maize WUE by 29. 69% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 1, straw returning increased maize yield by 7. 61%. Intervention effect At water supply level 2, straw returning increased maize yield by 8. 94%. Intervention effect At water supply level 3, straw returning increased maize yield by 18. 29%. Intervention effect At water supply level 4, straw returning increased maize yield by 6. 96%. Observation Straw returning with 70% field soil water capacity supply performed best jointly for ET, yield and WUE. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pattern B showed no significant yield increase or decrease .
no significant yield increasing or decreasing trend e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 e0 “there was no significant yield increasing or decreasing trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1847 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Biotrophic pathogens (leaf rust, yellow rust, powdery mildew) and the necrotrophic pathogens caused a significant yield decrease in both years.
necrotrophic pathogens e0 pathogen biotrophic e0 pathogen Verbatim
e0 “The biotrophic (leaf rust, yellow rust and powdery mildew) as well as the mentioned necrotrophic pathogens caused significant yield decrease in both years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1051 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Both drought and excess precipitation caused a decrease of yield and quality of all spring cereals.
drought and excess precipitation e2 yield and quality e2 Verbatim
e1 “protein content of spring cereals over 19 years (1991-2009) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–208 e2 “It can be stated that the both stress conditions - drought and excess precipitation caused decrease of yield and quality of all the crops. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–666 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Proper nutrient management can significantly mitigate the overall decrease in rice yield under future climatic conditions
proper nutrient management e1 overall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The overall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions can be mitigated significantly by proper nutrient management and altering planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1168 e2 “rice production in Northeast Thailand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–245 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Altering planting dates can significantly mitigate the overall decrease in rice yield under future climatic conditions
altering planting dates e1 overall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The overall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions can be mitigated significantly by proper nutrient management and altering planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1168 e2 “rice production in Northeast Thailand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–245 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
With current April sowing and unchanged management, future sorghum yield was simulated to decrease by 5% to 24%.
future Sorghum yield e0 current sowing window (April) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Keeping the current sowing window (April) and other management activities the same, future Sorghum yield has simulated to decrease between 5% and 24% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1358 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Oryza sativa
Sorghum