View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher manure rates did not increase spelt yield and often tended to decrease it.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Higher rate didn’t increase the yield and often caused tendency for yield decreasing. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–745 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T 1 produced higher water use efficiency without a significant decrease in yield parameters.
Outcomewater use efficiency ( WUE ) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “T 1 produced higher water use efficiency ( WUE ) with no significant decrease in yield parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1178 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Excess fertilization did not significantly decrease yield .
Treatmentexcessive fertilization e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The yield is not significantly decrease d under the excessive fertilization. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1159 t0 “wheat yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in spikelet number is one of the main reasons for the yield reduction under water deficit.
Qualifierdecrease of spikelets numbers e3 Verbatim
e0 “During panicle development stage of hybrid rice varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 e3 “The decrease of spikelets numbers is one of the main reasons leading to yield reduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–690 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe drought caused a greater grain yield decrease in Yangmai-16.
Treatmentsevere drought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under severe drought stress, Yangmai-16 displayed relatively less adaptability to drought, with a slower recovery after re-watering and a greater decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1326 t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum ) cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–106 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Quantum yield varied significantly with oxygen partial pressure, with the greatest decrease at 2 kPa oxygen.
Treatment2 kPa of oxygen e0 Comparatoroxygen partial pressures e0 Verbatim
e0 “The quantum yield data showed significant variation among the oxygen partial pressures with the most significant decrease at 2 kPa of oxygen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–999 t0 “radish ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Later nitrogen fertilization reduced its production benefit and tended to decrease dry yield .
Treatmentnitrogen fertilizer e0 Outcomedry pasturage yield e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With fertilization time delay gradually,the role of nitrogen fertilizer on the increase production decrease d uccording to the experiment data and there was decrease tend in the dry pasturage yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–722 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the No-till system there was a reliable decrease in wheat yield of 0.24 t/ha.
TreatmentNo-till system e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the No-till system there was a reliable decrease in wheat yield on 0.24 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1600 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The extent of yield decrease with higher soil ESP was higher for varieties Pragati and CKP-25.
MaterialPragati and CKP-25 e0 Outcomeextent of decrease in yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “the extent of decrease in yield was lower for the varieties Praman· and Nima and higher for the varieties Pragati and CKP-25 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–662 t0 “Lemongrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Precipitation during the growing season negatively affected rice yield in 68% of counties, with a decrease of about 2.3%.
Valueapproximately −2.3% e3 Qualifierin 68% of the counties e3 Verbatim
e3 “GSP negatively impacted rice yield in 68% of the counties, with a decrease of approximately −2.3% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1093 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.