View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading did not produce a detected significant decrease in Satsuma mandarin yield .
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in yield due to shading was not detected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–502 e1 “Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–437 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T4 did not significantly decrease fresh yield of Chinese cabbage.
Directionwithout a significant decrease e4 Verbatim
e4 “However, it was clearly noted that T4 (MSFLI30) treatment could save water and nitrogen without a significant decrease in fresh yield of Chinese cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–959 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging at the tillering stage caused the greatest yield penalty, a 10%–15% decrease .
Organ / stagetillering stage e1 Treatmentwaterlogging at the tillering stage e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “waterlogging in winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–71 e1 “the greatest yield penalties occurred by waterlogging at the tillering stage (10%–15% decrease ), followed by the jointing stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–292 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased grain yield of both crops was followed by a decrease in ß-carotene, particularly in maize.
TreatmentIncreased grain yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increased grain yield of both crops was followed by decrease in ß-carotene and increase in phytate, particularly in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1109 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in applied water decrease d the plant Cl threshold for seed yield reduction.
Treatmentdecrease in applied water e0 OutcomeClp threshold for seed yield reduction e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 e0 “a decrease in applied water decrease d Clp threshold for seed yield reduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1091 Other claims from this paper (6) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hairiness of pepper could decrease the loss rate of economic yield .
Treatmenthairiness character e6 Outcomeloss rate of pepper economic yield e6 Verbatim
t0 “COMPARISON OF DROUGHT RESISTANCE OF PEPPER WITH DIFFERENT HAIRINESS CHARACTER UNDER DROUGHT STRESS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 e6 “hairiness character of pepper could decrease the loss rate of pepper economic yield effectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1131 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield .
Treatment20 kg Cd ha(-1) application e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511 e1 “lettuce plant and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Paraquat did not decrease alfalfa seed yield or thousand-seed weight.
Outcomeseed yield and thousand-seed weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Paraquat did not decrease the seed yield and thousand-seed weight,and had no effect on germination rate within the appropriate concentration range. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–690 t0 “Medicago sativa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg overestimated yield decrease when relative evapotranspiration exceeded 0.8.
Outcomeoverestimates its value e0 Qualifierrelative evapotranspiration is above 0.8 e0 Verbatim
e0 “however it overestimates its value when the relative evapotranspiration is above 0.8. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1115 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Verticillium disease led to a 7.86% decrease in seed cotton yield .
InteractorVerticilli um dahliae t0 pathogen Outcomeseedcotton yield e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Verticilli um dahliaeKleb. on cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–44 e0 “Main plotconsisted ofinfected and non-infected area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–508 e1 “Diseaseledtoadecrease(7.86%)inseedcotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1440 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation There were significant differences among the cotton varieties for all investigated characteristics. Observation Infected versus non-infected area differences were significant for all investigated traits except ginning percentage. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, foliar disease index, vascular disease index and vascular disease rate decreased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, first picking percentage, fiber fineness and micronaire decreased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, yellowness decreased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, seed cotton yield and fiber yield increased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, fiber length, strength and elongation increased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, uniformity, reflectance and spinning consistency index increased. Intervention effect Ginning percentage was unaffected by infected versus non-infected area differences. Intervention effect Growing cotton varieties in the non-infected area gave a 323.60 kg ha-1 increase in seed cotton yield. Intervention effect Growing cotton varieties in the non-infected area gave a 114.50 kg ha-1 increase in lint yield. Intervention effect Verticillium disease led to a 6.73% decrease in fiber yield. Observation Cotton variety GW-Teks was tolerant in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety GW-Golda was tolerant in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety Carmen was tolerant in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety Sayar314 was sensitive in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety Stoneville453 was sensitive in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Recommendation Tolerant cotton varieties can be used as parents in Verticillium breeding programs. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.