View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A 0.5℃ increase produced a maximum simulated yield decrease of 13.37%, averaging 7.31%.
Light increased 0.5℃ e0 average reduction of 7.31% e0 Verbatim
e0 “Light increased 0.5℃,the highest yield decrease range reached 13.37%,with average reduction of 7.31% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1133 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping P. maximum cv. Mombaça caused a greater decrease in maize grain yield .
Intercropping of P. maximum cv. Mombaça with maize e0 maize grain yield e0 higher decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Intercropping of P. maximum cv. Mombaça with maize showed higher decrease in maize grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1015 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
The smallest maize yield decrease occurred with late January to February sowings.
late sowings between January and February e0 Verbatim
e0 “the smallest in the late sowings between January and February ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–885 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping limited the weed-related maize yield decrease to 16%.
intercropping with cowpea e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “intercropping with cowpea reduced this to only a 16% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031 t0 “maize ( Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Association author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield is projected to decrease under future climate conditions because of lower grain weight and ripened grain ratio.
future climate conditions e7 grain weight decreased by shorter grain filling period e7 Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Yield Components of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 e7 “grain yield would decrease under future climate conditions due to grain weight decrease d by shorter grain filling period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3083–3203 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The rate of simulated Sarjoo-52 yield decrease was faster under delayed July 25th transplanting.
delayed transplanting of July 25th e0 Verbatim
e0 “The Rate of decrease of simulated yield of rice Sarjoo-52 variety under 2020 to 2080 was faster under delayed transplanting of July 25th ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1512 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Jointing booting water control tended to slightly decrease yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yield had a slightly decreasing tendency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–666 t0 “Rice Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting a portfolio of soybean varieties can decrease soybean yield variability in Arkansas.
planting a portfolio of soybean varieties e1 yield variability e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The results showed that there are significant advantages in planting a portfolio of soybean varieties that can enhance profits and decrease yield variability for soybean producers in Arkansas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–843 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield decrease depended on weather, weed infestation and stem base rot.
winter wheat yield e0 weed infestation e0 weather conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in winter wheat yield depended on weather conditions, weed infestation and the occurrence of stem base rot (Fusarium spp.). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–799 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The three perennial crops did not show a corresponding yield decrease with declining precipitation.
no corresponding decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield s of maize, cotton and soybean decrease d sharply with decreasing precipitation, but there was no corresponding decrease in yield of the three perennial biomass crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1360 t0 “mimosa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Vigna unguiculata
Oryza sativa
Glycine max
Fusarium
Mimosa