View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cutting did not significantly decrease stock plant yield .
no significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Importantly, stock plants showed no significant decrease in plant yield after cutting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1144 t0 “white potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–79 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A one percent increase in March deviation corresponded to a 5.6 unit decrease in maize yield .
March deviation e0 1 per cent increase e0 Verbatim
e0 “1 per cent increase in March deviation leads to 5.6 unit decrease in yield of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1074 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Sunshine decrease and warming were identified as main causes of maize yield decline.
sunshine duration decrease and the temperature rise e0 maize yield declining e0 Verbatim
e0 “indicating that the sunshine duration decrease and the temperature rise are the main causes of the maize yield declining. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1659 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
LaCl3 irrigation exacerbated the low-temperature decrease in tomato physiology and yield .
lanthanum chloride(LaCl3) e0 Pn,root activity and yield e1 exacerbated the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Irrigation with ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid(EGTA) or lanthanum chloride(LaCl3) exacerbated the decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–665 e1 “decrease of Pn,root activity and yield of tomato under LNT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–556 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage did not decrease sugar beet yield .
reduced tillage systems e0 did not result in either a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The reduced tillage systems in sugar beet cultivation did not result in either a yield decrease or a worse technological quality of roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1704 t0 “sugar beets ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Simulated crop yield changed under Decrease in temperature more than 2oC.
Decrease in temperature more than 2oC e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 e0 “Decrease in temperature more than 2oC decrease s crop yield by 10 to 20 g m-2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3574–3650 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease in fruit set percent led to a reduction in total yield per plant.
total yield per plant e0 Decrease in fruit set percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in fruit set percent led to reduction in the total yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1293 t0 “Capsicum annuum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pethoxamid did not decrease rice yield
nontreated control e1 Verbatim
e1 “A reduction in rice shoot density and plant height compared to the nontreated control followed the use of pethoxamid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1216 e2 “however, no decrease in yield resulted ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1256 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DI and PRD did not significantly decrease yield .
did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “these treatments did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1556 t0 “lemon Fino 49 trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 e1 “DI and PRD decrease d stomatal conductance and photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1501 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield .
training to an espalier shape e0 does not decrease e0 with and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Solanum lycopersicum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Glycine max
Capsicum annuum
Oryza sativa
Citrus
Olea