View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
Treatmentbasal 25% defoliation e0 OutcomeTDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield tended to decrease at 60 kg/ha sulphur.
Treatmenthigher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at higher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) the yield tended to decrease in potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–620 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d solar radiation decrease d simulated maize yield .
Treatmentdecrease in solar radiation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in solar radiation and decrease carbondioxide concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1664 t0 “yield of rainfed maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–47 Other claims from this paper (18) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Each approximately 1% decrease in chalkiness accompanied approximately 1% greater head rice yield .
Verbatim
e0 “for every ∼1% decrease in chalkiness, an increase of ∼1% in head rice yield follows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–499 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Cover crops showed no increase or a slight decrease in soybean seed yield in 2007 and 2009.
Directionno yield increase or slight yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 2007 and 2009 no yield increase or slight yield decrease was shown by the cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1264 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Flowering and pod formation had the greatest yield decrease after defoliation.
Organ / stageflowering and pods formation e0 Directionhighest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest decrease was detected for flowering and pods formation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–847 e1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–693 e2 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Goytacazes) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–262 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing led to a slight initial yield undulation, then a decrease in yield , with a significant difference.
Treatmentdelayed sowing e1 Directionbegan to decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The kind of rice Wanxian 98 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 e1 “The results indicated that delayed sowing would lead to slightly undulated yield firstly, and then began to decrease and the difference was significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–301 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The burndown treatment with glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam did not decrease soybean yield .
Treatmentglyphosate + halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The burndown treatment to Conyza spp. with glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam did not decrease soybean yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1456 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The salinity-induced yield decrease was maximum in PS 1347.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “two soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 e4 “salinity decrease d the grain yield and biological yield in both the genotypes, the decrease being maximum in PS 1347 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–983 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
All PSII associated chlorophyll pools experienced the decrease in triplet yield .
Qualifierall the Chl pools associated with PSII e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in ³Chl* yield is equally experienced by all the Chl pools associated with PSII ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–967 t0 “Physcomitrella patens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–92 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.