Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6,864 matchesgrouped into 3,617 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1,201 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 31 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 24-132%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 3.7-37%e0
Comparator: P45e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: Grain-Cd concentratione0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 34%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Grain-Cd concentration decreased at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus 16

Show all 16 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Pe0
Outcome: CDM/RDM relatione0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Ne0
Outcome: grain yield (GY)e0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Ne0
Outcome: oil yield (OY)e0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions. 16

Show all 16 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip tillage reduced crop yield by 20% versus conventional tillage.

Taxon: crope0
Treatment: strip-tillage (ST)e0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 20%e0
Comparator: conventional tillage (CT)e0

Verbatim

e0
“Regarding crop yield, strip-tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT) got a decrease of 20% and 15% compared to conventional tillage (CT).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2441

Title

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions.

Donato Cillis Padua@research (University of Padova) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)

Method / resource Four homogeneous management zones were defined.
Intervention effect No tillage reduced crop yield by 15% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture increased total crop yield by over 10% in conservation tillage.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage with precision agriculture had 2% higher net energy than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced strip tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced no tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with minimum tillage increased energy efficiency 10% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with no tillage increased energy efficiency 2% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with strip tillage increased energy efficiency 15% versus fixed input rates.
Observation SALUS projected soil organic carbon stock loss across treatments.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage simulated 17% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage simulated 63% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage reduced farming operation carbon emissions.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture optimized fossil fuel and fertilizer use.
Intervention effect No tillage with precision agriculture reduced total CO2 by 56% versus conventional tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage reduced crop yield by 15% versus conventional tillage.

Taxon: crope0
Treatment: no-tillage (NT)e0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 15%e0
Comparator: conventional tillage (CT)e0

Verbatim

e0
“Regarding crop yield, strip-tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT) got a decrease of 20% and 15% compared to conventional tillage (CT).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2441

Title

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions.

Donato Cillis Padua@research (University of Padova) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)

Method / resource Four homogeneous management zones were defined.
Intervention effect Strip tillage reduced crop yield by 20% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture increased total crop yield by over 10% in conservation tillage.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage with precision agriculture had 2% higher net energy than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced strip tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced no tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with minimum tillage increased energy efficiency 10% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with no tillage increased energy efficiency 2% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with strip tillage increased energy efficiency 15% versus fixed input rates.
Observation SALUS projected soil organic carbon stock loss across treatments.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage simulated 17% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage simulated 63% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage reduced farming operation carbon emissions.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture optimized fossil fuel and fertilizer use.
Intervention effect No tillage with precision agriculture reduced total CO2 by 56% versus conventional tillage.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

SALUS projected soil organic carbon stock loss across treatments.

Taxon: crope1
Outcome: soil organic carbon (SOC) stocke0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“SALUS simulation shown a general trend among the treatments characterized by a decrease in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3513–3636

e1
“historical crop-yield data”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1655

Title

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions.

Donato Cillis Padua@research (University of Padova) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)

Method / resource Four homogeneous management zones were defined.
Intervention effect Strip tillage reduced crop yield by 20% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage reduced crop yield by 15% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture increased total crop yield by over 10% in conservation tillage.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage with precision agriculture had 2% higher net energy than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced strip tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced no tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with minimum tillage increased energy efficiency 10% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with no tillage increased energy efficiency 2% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with strip tillage increased energy efficiency 15% versus fixed input rates.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage simulated 17% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage simulated 63% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage reduced farming operation carbon emissions.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture optimized fossil fuel and fertilizer use.
Intervention effect No tillage with precision agriculture reduced total CO2 by 56% versus conventional tillage.

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 1 662.0 kg/hae0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI before silkinge0
Direction: limitede0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI after silkinge0
Direction: slowe0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: soil bulk densitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 5.63 %e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: phosphoruse0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 8.73%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: potassiume0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 5.22%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: biological yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: photosynthesis ratee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) 15

Show all 15 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with photosynthetic characteristics.

Taxon: proso milletPanicum miliaceumt0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: positivee0
Comparator: photosynthetic characteristicse0

Verbatim

e0
“Significantly positive correlations were observed between the grain yield and photosynthetic characteristics or N use efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–958

t0
“proso millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164

Title

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Xiangwei Gong; Jing Li; Hongchi Ma; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1619077

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased chlorophyll content in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased intercellular CO2 concentration in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency negatively regulated proso millet carbon–nitrogen balance.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased the C/N ratio in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency reduced total N, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency resulted in high starch content in proso millet.
Intervention effect Lower available N significantly reduced proso millet N uptake and utilisation.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with N use efficiency.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated negatively with the C/N ratio.
Intervention effect N0 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N60 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N105 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Method / resource The developed N fertiliser regression formulae were presented as useful for choosing proso millet N rates.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proso millet grain yield correlated negatively with the C/N ratio.

Taxon: proso milletPanicum miliaceumt0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: negativee0
Comparator: C/N ratioe0

Verbatim

e0
“a negative correlation was found between the grain yield and the C/N ratio.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1043

t0
“proso millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164

Title

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Xiangwei Gong; Jing Li; Hongchi Ma; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1619077

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased chlorophyll content in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased intercellular CO2 concentration in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency negatively regulated proso millet carbon–nitrogen balance.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased the C/N ratio in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency reduced total N, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency resulted in high starch content in proso millet.
Intervention effect Lower available N significantly reduced proso millet N uptake and utilisation.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with photosynthetic characteristics.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with N use efficiency.
Intervention effect N0 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N60 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N105 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Method / resource The developed N fertiliser regression formulae were presented as useful for choosing proso millet N rates.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with N use efficiency.

Taxon: proso milletPanicum miliaceumt0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: positivee0
Comparator: N use efficiencye0

Verbatim

e0
“Significantly positive correlations were observed between the grain yield and photosynthetic characteristics or N use efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–958

t0
“proso millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164

Title

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Xiangwei Gong; Jing Li; Hongchi Ma; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1619077

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased chlorophyll content in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased intercellular CO2 concentration in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency negatively regulated proso millet carbon–nitrogen balance.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased the C/N ratio in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency reduced total N, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency resulted in high starch content in proso millet.
Intervention effect Lower available N significantly reduced proso millet N uptake and utilisation.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with photosynthetic characteristics.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated negatively with the C/N ratio.
Intervention effect N0 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N60 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N105 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Method / resource The developed N fertiliser regression formulae were presented as useful for choosing proso millet N rates.

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: days of germinatione0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 7.00e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: fresh pod yield plant-1e1
Direction: higheste2
Value: 227.99 ge1
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

e1
“fresh pod yield plant-1 (227.99 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1147

e2
“highest plant height”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–839

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: fresh pod yield bed-1e1
Direction: higheste2
Value: 15.04 kge1
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

e1
“fresh pod yield bed-1 (15.04 kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1181

e2
“highest plant height”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–839

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS 14

Show all 14 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weed-crop competition periode5
Outcome: leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield componentse5
Direction: decreasee5

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e5
“decrease in leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components with an increase in weed-crop competition period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1251

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weedy checke1
Interactor: weede1weed
Outcome: stripped cane yielde7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 54.98e7
Qualifier: 2006-07e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e7
“In 2006-07, the respective decrease in stripped cane yield was 9.84, 18.76, 22.92, 27.98, 38.75, and 54.98%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1592

e1
“weed-crop competition periods of 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 DAS and weedy check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1424

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Association Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weed-crop competition periodse1
Interactor: weede1weed
Outcome: stripped cane yielde7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 9.84e7
Qualifier: 2006-07e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e7
“In 2006-07, the respective decrease in stripped cane yield was 9.84, 18.76, 22.92, 27.98, 38.75, and 54.98%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1592

e1
“weed-crop competition periods of 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 DAS and weedy check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1424

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Association Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment: controle0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 48.0e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1030

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 7.9e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 4.0e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus 16

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions. 16

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) 15

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) 15

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun 15

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS 14

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14