View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate for the yield decrease in napiergrass.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1335 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
application of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield , although marginal was statistically insignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield .
herbicides evaluated e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear was associated with the decrease in grain yield (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001).
Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate formulation did not interact with yield decrease .
formulation interaction with yield decrease e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “There was not found any formulation interaction with yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1313 e1 “glyphosate-tolerant soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–659 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in redistributed seed N correlated strongly with increased yield .
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–117 e0 “this decrease strongly correlated with increased yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1218 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.
Verbatim
e0 “wheat yield would decrease across locations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield .
injure strawberry or decrease yield e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “provides PRE weed control in strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150 e2 “Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear largely caused the decrease in maize grain yield .
decrease in grain yield e4 largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear e4 Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Longer maturation restricted the decrease in grain yield under stress.
decrease in grain yield e0 under stress conditions e0 sensitive cultivar e0 Verbatim
e0 “thus restricting heavy decrease in grain yield , under stress conditions, as compared to the sensitive cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1595 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Water yield could decrease due to greater evapotranspiration from the crops.
higher evapotranspiration (ET) rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “Water yield would potentially decrease because of higher evapotranspiration (ET) rate from switchgrass and Miscanthus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2394–2511 Other claims from this paper (13) Recommendation hypothesis original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
For high- yield producers, moderate stover harvest may decrease fuel use.
moderate stover harvest e6 Verbatim
e6 “moderate stover harvest may actually decrease fuel use ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1476 t0 “Corn Grain, Stover Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that TE application is a potential strategy to decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield .
application of TE e0 decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “the application of TE is a potential strategy to decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1054 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium radiobacter (PGPR) not only decrease nitrogen fertilizer application, but also improves soybean yield and yield components.
Rhizobium radiobacter (PGPR)e0 soybean yield and yield components e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Rhizobium radiobacter (PGPR) not only decrease nitrogen fertilizer application, but also improves soybean yield and yield components ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2913–3045 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect seeds of Giza 35 and Crawford cultivars without using biofertilizer showed a significant increase in seed yield, weight of pods (Mg/fed) and 100-seed weight (g), concentration and uptake of macro and micronutrients. Intervention effect seeds of Giza 35 and Crawford cultivars without using biofertilizer showed a significant increase in seed yield, weight of pods (Mg/fed) and 100-seed weight (g), concentration and uptake of macro and micronutrients. Intervention effect Crawford cultivar recorded the lowest value of proline. Intervention effect the highest values in protein and oil percentage. Intervention effect The inoculation of seeds for different cultivars of soybean gave the highest values of seed yield, weight of pods, protein and oil percentage. Intervention effect The inoculation of seeds for different cultivars of soybean gave the highest values of seed yield, weight of pods, protein and oil percentage. Intervention effect low proline content in comparison to untreated seeds. Intervention effect seeds treated with biofertilizer recorded a significant increase in the concentration and the uptake of macro and micronutrients. Intervention effect Giza 35 surpassed the other cultivars in seed yield, weight of pods, 100-seed weight. Intervention effect was significant in uptake of Fe, Mn and Zn in the first season. Intervention effect Crawford cultivar gave the highest values in seed yield, weight of pods and the uptake of Mn and Zn. Intervention effect significant increase in concentration of Fe, Mn and Zn in both seasons. Intervention effect Proline content was significantly response to inoculation with biofertilizer in Giza35 and Crawford cultivars and gave the lower values than the other cultivars. Intervention effect protein and oil % were significant increase in the same cultivars. Intervention effect Giza 22 cultivar recorded highly significantly enhancement for P% only in both seasons. Intervention effect highest uptake of P and K for the second season. Intervention effect soil pH and EC values were lowered in all the studied cultivars. Intervention effect available content of N, P and K were significantly increased. Intervention effect available of Fe, Mn and Zn were non-significant in comparison with untreated seeds. Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yield s as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Cenchrus purpureuse3
Triticum aestivum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Zea mays
Glycine max_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria
Panicum virgatum
Miscanthus
Zea mays subsp. mays
Helianthus annuus
Agrobacterium radiobacter
Solanum tuberosum