Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6,864 matchesgrouped into 1 category

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1,201 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 31 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

2010s 6864

Show all 6,864 →

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in kernels per ear largely caused the decrease in maize grain yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Outcome: decrease in grain yielde4
Qualifier: largely caused by the decrease in kernels per eare4

Verbatim

t0
“Differential responses of maize yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37

e4
“The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013

Title

Differential responses of maize yield to drought at vegetative and reproductive stages

MI Na; Fu CAI; Yushu ZHANG; et al. Plant Soil and Environment 2018. doi:10.17221/141/2018-pse

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Progressive drought significantly reduced maize grain yield during either the vegetative or the reproductive stage.
Intervention effect Reproductive-stage progressive drought reduced grain yield by 41.6-46.6%.
Intervention effect Vegetative-stage progressive drought reduced grain yield by 18.6-26.2%.
Intervention effect The grain yield reduction from reproductive-stage drought was greater than that from vegetative-stage drought.
Association The decrease in kernels per ear was associated with the decrease in grain yield (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001).
Recommendation Guaranteeing water supply for maize during the reproductive stage is crucially important to avoid yield loss.

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease.

Taxon: MAIZEZea mayst0
Outcome: appropriate to estimate the grain yield decreasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0
“The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028

t0
“WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78

Title

WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST

CLÍSTENES ANTÔNIO GUADAGNIN; EDGAR RICARDO SCHOFFEL; HELVIO DEBLI CASALINHO; et al. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 2017. doi:10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v16n1p61-71

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Observation The largest maize yield decrease occurred with early August sowing.
Observation The smallest maize yield decrease occurred with late January to February sowings.
Observation Yield decrease varied by up to 3.9% among maturation cycles.
Method / resource Isareg overestimated yield decrease when relative evapotranspiration exceeded 0.8.
Observation A 40% grain yield decrease had a 10.5% occurrence probability.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome: wheat yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“wheat yield would decrease across locations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291

Title

Effects of a wheat rotation on cotton production in a changing climate: a simulation study

Q Luo; M Bange; P Devoil Climate Research 2016. doi:10.3354/cr01413

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect For irrigated cotton, three years in and one year out is projected to give the best lint yield.
Intervention effect Cotton yields are projected to decrease under changing climate at most locations across crop sequences.
Intervention effect Wheat yields are projected to decrease more than cotton yields under changing climate.
Intervention effect Rain-fed continuous cotton is projected to perform better at Emerald, Dalby and/or Narrabri with solid and single skip rows.
Intervention effect A cotton-wheat sequence is projected to outperform continuous cotton for lint yields with double skip rows at Emerald, Moree and Narrabri.
Recommendation The authors recommend combining better crop sequences with other adaptation options to maintain production.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

2010s 6864