Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.

Taxon: Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Material: Larae0
Outcome: decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046

t0
“Sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10

t1
“decrease of yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898

Title

Sugar beet root yield and quality as affected by sowing date

Branko Marinković; Jovan Crnobarać; Goran Jačimović; et al. Zbornik radova Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo 2005

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect The first sowing date gave the highest root yield across cultivars and years.
Intervention effect First-date yield exceeded other sowing dates by 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%).
Intervention effect Mara yield decreased significantly on optimal sowing dates.
Intervention effect Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Association Sugar content variation was uncorrelated with sowing dates.
Association Root yield was the dominant contributor to sugar yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: RS narrowede0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32

Title

Row Spacing in the Early Soybean Production System

Glenn R. Bowers; James L. Rabb; Lanny O. Ashlock; et al. Agronomy Journal 2000. doi:10.2134/agronj2000.923524x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Five environmental clusters had significant yield gains of 17–36% as rows narrowed.
Intervention effect Three other clusters had nonsignificant yield increases with narrower rows.
Intervention effect One cluster had virtually no yield change with narrower rows.
Association Yield responded most to row spacing at 100 to 270 mm July and August rainfall.
Recommendation The authors recommend rows at most 40 cm to optimize ESPS yields in the midsouthern USA.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.

Taxon: Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Material: Sarae0
Outcome: decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046

t0
“Sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10

Title

Sugar beet root yield and quality as affected by sowing date

Branko Marinković; Jovan Crnobarać; Goran Jačimović; et al. Zbornik radova Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo 2005

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect The first sowing date gave the highest root yield across cultivars and years.
Intervention effect First-date yield exceeded other sowing dates by 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%).
Intervention effect Mara yield decreased significantly on optimal sowing dates.
Intervention effect Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Association Sugar content variation was uncorrelated with sowing dates.
Association Root yield was the dominant contributor to sugar yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nei2you 6 yield did not decrease significantly under light water stress.

Material: Nei2you 6e0
Treatment: light water stresse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of Nei2you 6 did not decrease significantly under light water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–244

Title

Effects of soil moisture on the accumulation of rice dry matter and yield

Li Hua; Wang DongYin; Defeng Zhu Xi'nan nongye xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced Nei2you 6 yield by 15.2%.
Intervention effect Yield of Ⅱyou 7954 increased under soil water stress.
Observation Nei2you 6 was more sensitive to soil water stress than Ⅱyou 7954.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress decreased Nei2you 6 dry matter accumulation by 22.0%.
Intervention effect Light water stress increased Ⅱyou 7954 dry matter accumulation by 8.4%.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress increased Ⅱyou 7954 dry matter accumulation by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress lowered dry matter transmission to the panicle in Nei2you 6 relative to the check.
Intervention effect Soil water stress raised dry matter transmission to the panicle in Ⅱyou 7954 relative to the check.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light water stress did not significantly decrease Nei2you6 yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Nei2you6e0
Treatment: light water stresse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: didn't decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated that the yield of Nei2you6 didn't decrease significantly under light water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–304

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63

Title

Effects of soil moisture on superficial roots and yield of rice

Li Hua; Zhang Yu-ping Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2006

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced Nei2you6 yield by 15.2%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress increased yield of Ⅱyou7954.
Observation Nei2you6 was more sensitive to soil water stress than Ⅱyou7954.
Intervention effect Light water stress slightly promoted superficial root growth.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Nei2you6 by 10.5%~31.6%.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Ⅱyou7954 by 13%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress enhanced superficial root activity.
Intervention effect Root cutting at panicle initiation caused more yield reduction than at flowering.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at panicle initiation decreased grain number per panicle.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at flowering decreased spikelet fertility rate.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield.

Taxon: potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: liquid spraye3
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Alternative protection of potatoes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34

e3
“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518

Title

Alternative protection of potatoes in organic farming.

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OSIRI did not significantly decrease sugarcane yield compared with the control method.

Taxon: sugarcanet0
Treatment: OSIRIt0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“without a significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1172

t0
“OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–74

Title

Field tests of OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane farms in Reunion

Jean-Louis Chopart; Lionel Le Mézo; J. Antoir; et al. Agritrop (Cirad) 2007

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource OSIRI reasonably simulated actual evapotranspiration in sugarcane.
Method / resource OSIRI reasonably simulated drainage below the sugarcane root zone.
Intervention effect OSIRI saved about 26% of irrigation delivery compared with the control method.
Intervention effect OSIRI increased irrigation water productivity by 25%.
Method / resource A survey of 25 farmers found OSIRI well accepted as a valuable decision-making tool.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I. tinctoria showed no significant relative yield decrease despite the highest shoot Pb concentration.

Taxon: I. tinctoriaIsatis tinctoriae0
Outcome: relative yield decreasee0
Direction: no significante0

Verbatim

e0
“The highest shoot Pb concentration was in I. tinctoria having no significant relative yield decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1048

Title

THE ASSESSMENT OF TOLERANCE TO HEAVY METALS (Cd,Pb and Zn) AND THEIR ACCUMULATION IN THREE WEED SPECIES

Osman Sönmez 2008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surabyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Material: Surabyeoe0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatmente0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0
“the decrease in yield was not significant in Surabyeo and Hwayeongbyeo compared with the 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–570

t0
“on Rice Growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40

Title

Effect of N-fertilization on Rice Growth and Quality of Milled Rice

Se‐Jong Kim; Jong‐Gun Won; Duok-Jong Ahn; et al. The Korean Journal of Crop Science 2006

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Five named varieties yielded over 470 kg/10a.
Intervention effect Low nitrogen reduced Junambyeo yield by over 10%.
Intervention effect Low nitrogen reduced Donganbyeo yield by over 10%.
Intervention effect Hwayeongbyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.
Observation Some varieties showed improved grain quality, chemistry and palatability.
Recommendation Six named varieties were selected as promising low nitrogen rice varieties.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hwayeongbyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Material: Hwayeongbyeoe0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatmente0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0
“the decrease in yield was not significant in Surabyeo and Hwayeongbyeo compared with the 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–570

t0
“on Rice Growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40

Title

Effect of N-fertilization on Rice Growth and Quality of Milled Rice

Se‐Jong Kim; Jong‐Gun Won; Duok-Jong Ahn; et al. The Korean Journal of Crop Science 2006

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Five named varieties yielded over 470 kg/10a.
Intervention effect Low nitrogen reduced Junambyeo yield by over 10%.
Intervention effect Low nitrogen reduced Donganbyeo yield by over 10%.
Intervention effect Surabyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.
Observation Some varieties showed improved grain quality, chemistry and palatability.
Recommendation Six named varieties were selected as promising low nitrogen rice varieties.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics