Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When soil water potential continued to decrease, no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.

Treatment
SWP continued to be decreasede6
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
no longer obvious decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52
e2

“the yield of two cultivars was decreased significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558
e6

“but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637

Title

Effect of Soil Moisture on Yield and Quality of Rice

Zheng Gui 2006

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nei2you 6 yield did not decrease significantly under light water stress.

Material
Nei2you 6e0
Treatment
light water stresse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield of Nei2you 6 did not decrease significantly under light water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–244

Title

Effects of soil moisture on the accumulation of rice dry matter and yield

Li Hua; Wang DongYin; Defeng Zhu Xi'nan nongye xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light water stress did not significantly decrease Nei2you6 yield.

Material
Nei2you6e0
Treatment
light water stresse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
didn't decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the yield of Nei2you6 didn't decrease significantly under light water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–304
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63

Title

Effects of soil moisture on superficial roots and yield of rice

Li Hua; Zhang Yu-ping Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2006

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
liquid spraye3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Alternative protection of potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34
e3

“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518

Title

Alternative protection of potatoes in organic farming.

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing substrate volume per plant by one third did not considerably decrease tomato yield.

Treatment
Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without considerable yield decreasee0
Value
1/3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 without considerable yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82
t0

“TOMATO YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12

Title

TOMATO YIELD DEPENDENT ON SUBSTRATE TYPE AND VOLUME

B. Benko; J. Borošić; B. Novak; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2008. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2008.779.57

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OSIRI did not significantly decrease sugarcane yield compared with the control method.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
OSIRIt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“without a significant decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1172
t0

“OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–74

Title

Field tests of OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane farms in Reunion

Jean-Louis Chopart; Lionel Le Mézo; J. Antoir; et al. Agritrop (Cirad) 2007

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I. tinctoria showed no significant relative yield decrease despite the highest shoot Pb concentration.

Taxon
I. tinctoriaIsatis tinctoriae0
Outcome
relative yield decreasee0
Direction
no significante0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest shoot Pb concentration was in I. tinctoria having no significant relative yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1048

Title

THE ASSESSMENT OF TOLERANCE TO HEAVY METALS (Cd,Pb and Zn) AND THEIR ACCUMULATION IN THREE WEED SPECIES

Osman Sönmez 2008

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-rice yield under the different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time.

Outcome
early-rice yielde0
Direction
did not significantly increase or decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64
e0

“early-rice yield under different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–368

Title

Yield Trends and Reasons for Their Change in Red-soil Rice Field with Long-term Organic Matter Circling

Xie Xiao-li 2007

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Manhattan in 2008, delayed planting did not decrease yield.

Treatment
delayed plantinge0
Outcome
yieldt1
Direction
did not decreasee0
Qualifier
in 2008e0
Setting
Manhattan, KSt1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34
e0

“did not decrease at all with delayed planting in 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1126
t1

“delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998

Title

EFFECT OF DELAYED PLANTING ON CORN IN CENTRAL KANSAS

Aaron James Sindelar; Kraig L. Roozeboom K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) 2008

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy yield from gasification of switchgrass did not decrease on a unit biomass basis.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
Energy yield from gasificatione1
Qualifier
did not decrease on a unit biomass basise1

Verbatim

t0

“Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76
e1

“Energy yield from gasification did not decrease on a unit biomass basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1100

Title

Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring

Paul R. Adler; Matt A. Sanderson; Akwasi A. Boateng; et al. Agronomy Journal 2006. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0351

Other claims from this paper (9)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.