View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
White-sugar yield did not decrease under sodium application.
white‐sugar yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “ultimately there was no decrease in white‐sugar yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1293 t0 “sodium in sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 e1 “growth and quality of sugar beet were not affected by Na application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1234 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield .
six plants per meter e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield and economic benefit would decrease .
yield and economic benefit e0 Verbatim
t0 “litchi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 e0 “the yield and economic benefit decreasing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–753 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Grass yield was predicted to decrease in eastern Ireland under climate change.
climate change e1 east of the country e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grass yield was predicted to decrease in the east of the country due to summer drought stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–976 e1 “grass yield in Ireland due to climate change ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–237 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
For Jupiter rice, head rice yield fell 8.5 pp per 1.0 pp decrease in surface lipid content.
1.0 pp decrease in SLC e0 Verbatim
e0 “those of Jupiter, 8.5 pp decrease in HRY per 1.0 pp decrease in SLC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–874 e1 “rice cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–508 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato yield improved with a proper decrease of fertilization amount compared with the local conventional amount.
proper decrease of fertilization amount e3 local conventional fertilization amount e3 Verbatim
e3 “the tomato yield was improved with the proper decrease of fertilization amount compared with the local conventional fertilization amount ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–733 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reed yield did not decrease with irrigation water salinity below 0.9%.
Phargmites Communis e0 less than 0.9% water salinity irrigation water e2 didn't decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Based on the Phargmites Communis production areas in wetland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 e2 “Yield of reed didn't decrease with less than 0.9% water salinity irrigation water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–530 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In wide rows, yield decrease under spurred anoda interference was attributed to reduced boll retention or fruiting sites.
spurred anoda interference e0 spurred anoda e0 weed reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease as a result of spurred anoda interference in WR was due to reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites (predicated on a decrease in branch weight). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1238 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
TCB was the main reason for the decrease of rice grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The survival percentage of rice seedlings was significantly reduced by TCB, which was the main reason for the decrease of the grain yield , while NAP had little effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–461 t0 “on grain yield and quality of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–85 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In ultra narrow rows, yield decrease under spurred anoda interference was attributed to plant mortality.
spurred anoda e0 weed plant mortality e0 Verbatim
e0 “However, in UNR, the yield decrease was due to plant mortality; the plant density of both cotton cultivars decrease d by one plant for each additional spurred anoda, but the yield per plant for surviving plants remained constant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1467 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Phaseolus vulgaris
Litchi
Oryza sativa
Solanum lycopersicum
Gossypium hirsutum