View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Energy yield from gasification of switchgrass did not decrease on a unit biomass basis.
Energy yield from gasification e1 did not decrease on a unit biomass basis e1 Verbatim
t0 “Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 e1 “Energy yield from gasification did not decrease on a unit biomass basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1100 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The biomass yield rate decrease was smaller in S1 than ATP.
decrease in biomass yield rate e0 relatively less e0 Verbatim
e0 “Per cent of decrease in biomass yield rate and CMS was relatively less in S1 than in ATP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–509 t0 “mulberry (Morus alba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–61 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
NaCl addition five days before transplanting did not decrease yield .
Addition of NaCl 5 days before transplanting e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Addition of NaCl 5 days before transplanting did not decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–822 t0 “Cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated resistant lines had a small but significant yield decrease relative to susceptible lines.
resistant lines e0 susceptible lines e0 Verbatim
e0 “A small but significant decrease in yield was observed for noninoculated resistant lines in contrast to susceptible lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Each additional degree of future summer warming could decrease corn yield by 13 %.
future warming during summer months e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “of future warming during summer months, corn and soybean yield s could potentially decrease by 13 % and 16%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–907 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Each additional degree of future summer warming could decrease soybean yield by 16%.
future warming during summer months e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “of future warming during summer months, corn and soybean yield s could potentially decrease by 13 % and 16%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–907 Other claims from this paper (6) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Too high a density and more N fertilizer could decrease yield .
Too bigger density and more N fertilizer rate e1 Verbatim
t0 “Summer Maize Zhuyu 309 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–126 e1 “Too bigger density and more N fertilizer rate could decrease the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1472 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease .
pod number per plant e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818 t0 “pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was more significant when weed was in rows of maize, in both seasons.
weed in rows of maize e3 in both seasons e3 Verbatim
e3 “Yield was significantly affected by the weed position in both seasons and the decrease was more significant in variants with weed in rows of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling before cotton did not decrease corn yield the following year.
in-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop provided maximum cotton yield s with no decrease in corn yield the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1585 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Panicum virgatumt0
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Glycine max
Zea mays
Lathyrus oleraceus