a marginal 2.6% decrease in each of yield or price of vegetablee3
Verbatim
e0
“We took a case study of users of commercial organic fertilizer (UCOF) and users of inorganic fertilizer (UIF) in vegetable production”
e3
“However, either a marginal 2.6% decrease in each of yield or price of vegetable or a 32.4% increase in price of commercial organic fertilizer will make commercial organic fertilizer technology not superior to inorganic fertilizer”
T. Alimi; O. C. Ajewole; O.O. Olubode-Awosola; et al. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)2007
“to evaluate effects of enhanced UV-B radiation (ultraviolet radiation, broad band, 280-400nm) on development and yield of maize under field and natural sunlight conditions”
e1
“It was concluded that the leaf area, the age of leaf, the leaf number, the height of stem, the content of chlorophyll in leaves and the yield will decrease, and the content of flavonoid in leaves of maize will increase, as the UV-B radiation enhances”
“relative yielddecrease ( %) with increasing unit of ECw were 5.243 , 14.391, 8.187, 16.453 , 15.95 and 11.105 % for barley , wheat, maize, cucumber, pepper and tomato, respectively under SAR 7.”
M.M. Ragab Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering2007. doi:10.21608/jssae.2007.201548
“relative yielddecrease ( %) with increasing unit of ECw were 5.243 , 14.391, 8.187, 16.453 , 15.95 and 11.105 % for barley , wheat, maize, cucumber, pepper and tomato, respectively under SAR 7.”
M.M. Ragab Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering2007. doi:10.21608/jssae.2007.201548
“relative yielddecrease ( %) with increasing unit of ECw were 5.243 , 14.391, 8.187, 16.453 , 15.95 and 11.105 % for barley , wheat, maize, cucumber, pepper and tomato, respectively under SAR 7.”
M.M. Ragab Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering2007. doi:10.21608/jssae.2007.201548
“relative yielddecrease ( %) with increasing unit of ECw were 5.243 , 14.391, 8.187, 16.453 , 15.95 and 11.105 % for barley , wheat, maize, cucumber, pepper and tomato, respectively under SAR 7.”
M.M. Ragab Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering2007. doi:10.21608/jssae.2007.201548
“relative yielddecrease ( %) with increasing unit of ECw were 5.243 , 14.391, 8.187, 16.453 , 15.95 and 11.105 % for barley , wheat, maize, cucumber, pepper and tomato, respectively under SAR 7.”
M.M. Ragab Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering2007. doi:10.21608/jssae.2007.201548
Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.