View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined Cu and Zn deficiency further increased the effects of either Cu or Zn deficiency in wheat.
Treatmentcombined deficiency of Cu and Zn e4 Outcomeeffects of either Cu or Zn deficiency e4 Directionincreased further e4 ComparatorCu or Zn deficiency e4 Verbatim
e1 “Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) var. Sonalika was grown in purified sand in complete nutrient solution (normal) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–117 e4 “The effects of either Cu or Zn deficiency viz., intensification of foliar symptoms, decrease in biomass, leaf Cu/Zn, seed yield and starch content were increased further in combined deficiency of Cu and Zn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–911 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decline in flag-leaf photosynthetic rate under shading was partially compensated by an increase in Pn of the third leaf from the top.
Treatmentshaded from jointing to maturity e1 OutcomePn of the third leaf from the top e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “two winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) cultivars, Yangmai 158 (shading tolerant) and Yangmai 11 (shading sensitive), were shaded from jointing to maturity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–288 e5 “The decrease in photosynthetic rate ( Pn ) of flag leaf was partially compensated by the increase in Pn of the third leaf from the top ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1332 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect Under 22 % shading (S1), grain yield of Yangmai 158 was reduced by 6.4 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 22 % shading (S1), grain yield of Yangmai 11 was reduced by 9.9 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 33 % shading (S2), grain yield of Yangmai 158 was reduced by 16.2 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 33 % shading (S2), grain yield of Yangmai 11 was reduced by 25.8 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 22 % shading (S1), LAI of Yangmai 158 was reduced by 6.0 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 22 % shading (S1), LAI of Yangmai 11 was reduced by 9.2 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 33 % shading (S2), LAI of Yangmai 158 was reduced by 18.2 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 33 % shading (S2), LAI of Yangmai 11 was reduced by 22.2 % relative to the control (S0). Intervention effect Under 22 % shading (S1), canopy apparent photosynthetic rate declined by 15.0–22.9 % in the two wheat cultivars. Intervention effect Under 33 % shading (S2), canopy apparent photosynthetic rate declined by 29.5–49.6 % in the two wheat cultivars. Intervention effect Shading decreased the photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf. Intervention effect Under shading, the fraction of top and bottom leaf area to total leaf area increased, partly compensating the LAI reduction. Observation Flag-leaf Pn was low while flag-leaf Chl content was high at 30 DAA, an inconsistency under shading. Intervention effect Grain yield losses and LAI reduction under shading were less than the reduction in solar radiation. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The Double Cut Alternative tapping system increased latex sucrose and inorganic phosphorus.
TreatmentDouble Cut Alternative e1 Outcomelatex sucrose, inorganic phosphorus e3 Verbatim
e0 “Continuous decrease of the size of Thai rubber smallholdings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 e1 “A new tapping system ("Double Cut Alternative" or DCA, 2x ½ S d/4 (t,t) 7d/7) is studied in comparison with ½ S d/2 7d/7 control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–661 e3 “together associated with improved latex physiological profiles (higher latex sucrose, inorganic phosphorus and reduced thiols) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1445 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation changed protein by 3.91% relative to non-Biofertilizers treatments.
Comparatornon-Biofertilizers treatments e0 Verbatim
t0 “Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–73 e0 “Overall the results indicated that inoculation resulted in increase in seeds yield (21.17%), number of pods per plant (16.05%), number of branches (11.78%), weight of 1000 grain (2.92%), oil content of seeds (1.73%) and protein (3.91%) but decrease (-0.24%) in number of seeds per pods comparing to non-Biofertilizers treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1663 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated optimum stocking rate for Siratro fell from 2.2 to 1.3 head per hectare across study periods.
Outcomeestimated SR for maximum gain/ha e0 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Value1.3 and 3.7 head/ha e0 Verbatim
e0 “estimated SR for maximum gain/ha from 2.2 and 5.2 head/ha in the siratro and N-fert treatments in 1969‐1973 to 1.3 and 3.7 head/ha for the same pastures in 1977‐1981. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2157 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil N without N fertilizer in either rice season was significantly lower than in fertilized plots.
Treatmentwithout N fertilizer in either early or late season rice e0 Outcomealkali-hydrolyzed soil N content e0 Comparatorplots with N fertilizer in either season e0 Verbatim
e0 “The alkali-hydrolyzed soil N content in plots without N fertilizer in either early or late season rice was significantly lower than that in plots with N fertilizer in either season,but did not decrease continuously over years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1607 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.64% in Nile alluvial soil.
Treatmentreducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water table e0 Outcomeweight of 1000 grain e0 SettingNilealluvial soil e0 Verbatim
e0 “reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water table led todecrease plant height, panicle length, weight of 1000 grain, grain proteincontent and yield by 32.48, 24.13, 11.64, 11.78, and 86.55% in the Nilealluvial soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1520 t0 “SORGHUM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold conditions reduced seed protein fraction accumulation.
Treatmentcold conditions of the field e2 Outcomeprotein fractions (albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins) e1 Comparatorwarm conditions (control) e3 Verbatim
e0 “Chickpea is sensitive to cold conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 e1 “The stressed seeds of both the chickpea types experienced marked reduction in the accumulation of starch, proteins, fats, crude fibre, protein fractions (albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins) with a larger decrease in the macrocarpa type ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1872 e2 “was subjected to cold conditions of the field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1013 e3 “another set was maintained under warm conditions (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1134 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect Chilling increased electrolyte leakage in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling caused loss of chlorophyll in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose content in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling reduced leaf water status in chickpea, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased total plant weight of chickpea to the same level in both types. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased seed size, seed weight and pods per plant, most in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased the rate and duration of seed filling in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased harvest index in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed starch, protein, fat and crude fibre accumulation, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose accumulation in chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Chilling decreased seed starch synthase, sucrose synthase and invertase activity levels. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered calcium, phosphorus and iron in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered phenylalanine, tyrosine and threonine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered tryptophan, valine and histidine in stressed chickpea seeds. Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Moisture and ash contents increased more with R. dominica than with T. confusum infestation.
Outcomemoisture and ash contents e5 Comparatorthose infested with T. confusum e5 Verbatim
e5 “With respect to the infestation, decrease in the test weight, kernel weight and flour yield , and increases in the moisture and ash contents were more severe in the SW than in the HW, and in those infested with R. dominica compared to those infested with T. confusum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1153 t0 “soft and hard bread wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging inhibited single boll seed cotton weight 10 d after logging, and the inhibition could last 20 d after relief.
Outcomesingle boll seed cotton weight e5 Directiondecrease inferred e5 Qualifiercould last for 20 d even after the relieve of the logging e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “A two-year field trial of water logging treatment was carried out on three cotton cultivars at different days after blooming ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 e5 “The inhibition of water logging to single boll seed cotton weight was shown 10 d after logging,but could last for 20 d even after the relieve of the logging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–671 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.