View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Continued application did not cause a notable decrease in yield over the three years examined.
Directionno_change inferred e1 Verbatim
e1 “収量までの検討は3年間であったが, 継続施用による収量等の低下は特に発生しなかった ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–411 e2 “育苗箱全量基肥施肥法によって継続して栽培を行い, 水稲の生育・収量の変動について検討した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage tended to decrease the proportion of 113 to 170 g tubers.
Treatmentsubsoil tillage e0 Outcomeproportion of tubers e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “subsoil tillage tended to decrease proportion of tubers 113 to 170 g ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1058 t0 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
WUE did not decrease as water consumption fell.
Outcomewater use efficiency (WUE) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the water use efficiency (WUE) did not decrease along with the reduction of water consumption ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–593 e1 “WUE of peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–257 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded the heat-induced changes could significantly decrease economic benefit.
Verbatim
e0 “All of these could induce significant decrease of economy benefit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1089 t0 “Tomato in Greenhouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 Other claims from this paper (6) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed phenology may decrease marketable cucumber yield by about 22%.
Organ / stagefruit setting e0 Outcomemarketable yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “The delay, in relation to the dates in cluster 2 (high yield ), of the sowing date by 6 days, emergence by 16 days, flowering and fruit setting by 18 days, the beginning of harvesting by 19 days, and the end of harvesting by 22 days may contribute to a decrease in cucumber yield s even by about 27% and 22%, respectively for the total yield and the marketable yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1409 t0 “field cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–147 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Erect leaf form grain yield was attributed to decrease d plant height.
Organ / stageplant height e0 Qualifierdecrease of plant height e0 Verbatim
e0 “which is predetermined by decrease of plant height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–746 t0 “Selection of Rye (Secale cereal L) on increased photosynthetic activities of leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
March pruning gave the least variable pecan yield between 2003 and 2004, with a 38% decrease .
Outcomeyield of kernel lb/acre e2 Directionleast variable e2 Settingcommercial orchard in Charlie, Texas e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Pecan tree pruning is a standard cultural practice in commercial pecan farming operations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 e1 “`Pawnee' trees were pruned during March (winter), May, June, July and August in a commercial orchard in Charlie, Texas during the 2003 and 2004 growing seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–492 e2 “March pruning produced the least variable yield of kernel lb/acre (38% decrease ) between 2003 and 2004 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1004 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect June pruning gave the greatest two-year summed annual average pecan yield, 2447.7 kernel lb/acre, in a commercial orchard. Intervention effect June pruning gave the largest increase in kernel yield between 2003 and 2004, 625%. Intervention effect June pruning gave the largest increase in percent kernel between 2003 and 2004, 113%. Intervention effect June pruning produced the largest pecan nuts, 39.8 nuts/lb, in 2003. Intervention effect June pruning produced the lowest pecan kernel yield in 2003, 337.5 kernel lbs/acre. Intervention effect June pruning produced the smallest pecan nuts, 59.4 nuts/lb, in 2004. Intervention effect June pruning produced the highest pecan kernel yield in 2004, 2110.2 kernel lb/acre. Intervention effect July pruning gave the most consistent pecan percent kernel between 2003 and 2004, with a 1.3% increase. Intervention effect August pruning gave the lowest two-year summed annual average pecan yield, 879.8 kernel lbs/acre. Association Percent light transmission and leaf area index showed no correlation with pruning time or kernel yield. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
50% N (FYM) + 50% PK had a yield decrease of 86.4 kg/year versus 170.9 kg/year for 100% NPK.
Treatment50% N (FYM) + 50% PK of recommended dose e0 Comparator100% NPK (inorganic) e0 Verbatim
t0 “upland rice (Oryza sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–63 e0 “Application of 50% N (FYM) + 50% PK of recommended dose proved superior, as evident from lowest yield decrease of 86.4 kg/year compared with a maximum of 170.9 kg/year with application of 100% NPK (inorganic). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–688 Other claims from this paper (10) Association Fertilizer treatments differed significantly in all seasons. Method / resource The 50% N (FYM) + 50% NPK treatment had maximum yield predictability of 0.85. Method / resource The 50% N (FYM) + 50% NPK treatment had a prediction error of 511 kg/ha. Intervention effect The 50% N (FYM) + 50% NPK treatment had the maximum sustainability yield index of 0.47. Intervention effect The 50% N (FYM) + 50% NPK treatment had the maximum mean yield of 1,811 kg/ha. Intervention effect The 50% N (FYM) + 50% NPK treatment had the lowest yield variation of 29%. Recommendation For 500–750 mm seasonal rainfall, the authors suggest 32 kg/ha organic N with 28 kg/ha inorganic N for sustainable rice productivity. Recommendation For 750–1,000 mm seasonal rainfall, the authors suggest 22 kg/ha organic N with 33 kg/ha inorganic N. Recommendation For 1,000–1,250 mm seasonal rainfall, the authors suggest 17 kg/ha organic N with 39 kg/ha inorganic N. Recommendation For 1,500–1,750 mm seasonal rainfall, the authors suggest 14 kg/ha organic N with 47 kg/ha inorganic N. Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying sowing decrease d grain yield .
Treatmentdelay in the sowing date e1 Verbatim
e0 “simultaneous decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–795 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 e1 “With the delay in the sowing date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–725 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Winter damage reduced lucerne yield the following summer.
Treatmentwinter damages e0 Verbatim
e0 “winter damages killed 21 to 38 % of lucerne plants, and resulted yield decrease next summer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–596 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.