View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Future rice yield s decrease without carbon dioxide fertilization.
Qualifierwithout the CO 2 fertilization effect e0 Verbatim
e0 “simulated future rice yield s decrease without the CO 2 fertilization effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–644 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced grains per cob, mainly explaining lower grain yield .
Outcomenumber of grains per cob e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in grain yield due to water stress was mainly due to the decrease in the number of grains per cob ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–665 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Ozone treatment decrease d maximum photochemical yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “and the decrease of varphipo. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–997 t0 “Pinus halepensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading during the seeding period decrease d guar bean yield by 45.2%.
Organ / stageseeding period e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Guar Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 e0 “During seeding period shading has a major influence on the richness of seeds,leads to the remarkable decrease of kernel weight and 45.2% decrease of the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–884 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The measured soil quality decline had no significant effect on pasture or crop yield to date.
Treatmentthis measured decrease e0 Outcomepasture or crop yield e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Qualifierthis measured decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “this measured decrease has had no significant effect on pasture or crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1565 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry root yield of cassava continued to decrease to 12.59 t/ha in December with June planting.
OutcomeDry roots yields e1 Verbatim
t0 “cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–104 e1 “Dry roots yield s were highest (15.27 t ha-1) when roots were harvested in September, but continued to decrease up to 12.59 t ha-1 in December with June planting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1017 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spring cabbage yield did not decrease under the reduced fertilizer application.
TreatmentN,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2)) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “when the N,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2)) the yield s of cherry tomato and spring cabbage did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–379 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in dicot intensity was associated with a decrease in rice grain yield of 1.64 q ha-1.
Outcomerice grain yield e6 Verbatim
t0 “aromatic rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Cv. Pusa Basmati 1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–114 e6 “The unit increase in intensity of monocots, dicots and weed dry weight causes decrease in rice grain yield by 2.18, 1.64 and 2.85 q ha-1 respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1069 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each quarter of trunk circumference that was galled was associated with a 12% decrease in cumulative walnut nut yield over the first 4 years of production.
Treatmentquarter of trunk circumference that was galled e6 Outcomecumulative nut yield e6 Qualifierover the first 4 years of production e6 Verbatim
t0 “Crown gall can spread between walnut trees in nurseries and reduce future yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 e6 “For every quarter of trunk circumference that was galled, there was a 12% decrease in cumulative nut yield over the first 4 years of production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–894 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Active P slightly decrease d at 41–60 cm.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “slighty decrease in 41~60 cm soil layer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–902 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.