View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in the number of rice panicles and spikelets per panicle was one of the main reasons for yield loss of cultivated rice.
Qualifiernumber of rice panicles and spikelets per panicle e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of number of rice panicles and spikelets per panicle,was one of the main reasons causing yield loss of cultivated rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–332 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Including transpiration efficiency in the index would prevent its decrease when selecting for kernel yield .
Outcomean index including TE e0 Verbatim
e0 “Use of an index including TE would prevent selection for decreasing TE when selecting for KY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1627 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing ozone concentration and duration decrease d biomass and yield .
Outcomebiomass and yield e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease biomass and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–956 t0 “Chinese cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in 100-seed weight was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of 100-seed weight of soybean was not significant(P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–679 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Figaron did not fully overcome yield loss under severe water deficit.
Treatmentapplication of Figaron e0 Outcomedecrease of yield e0 Qualifiersevere water deficit e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “application of Figaron could not fully overcome the decrease of yield caused by a severe water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1338 e1 “soybean (Glycine max L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–61 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aman yield decrease d in severe flood years.
Verbatim
e0 “due to the decrease of the cultivated area and yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–506 t0 “Rice Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–49 e1 “In these severe flood years, the rainy season crop aman drastically declined in production due to the decrease of the cultivated area and yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–506 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Apparent quantum yield decline was related to reduced electron transport.
Outcomedecrease of apparent quantum yield e0 Qualifierreduction of electron transport e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of apparent quantum yield was related to reduction of electron transport. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–723 t0 “Populus davidiana Dode ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–89 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging reduced yield by 2.5%~48.6% in some peanut genotypes.
TreatmentW_(88) and W_(10) e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “W_(88) and W_(10) caused decrease by 2.5%~48.6% in some genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–701 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The increase in oil content from positive selection was achieved without any decrease in seed yield of white mustard.
Treatmentcontinuous positive selection e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “By continuous positive selection during twelve years oil content was increased with 7.46 %, and by negative selection decrease d with 7.32 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–586 e5 “The increase in oil content has been possible without any decrease in seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–793 t0 “Continuous selection for seed number per pod and oil content in white mustard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated maize planting could extend to early January with 30 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease .
Directionwithout a significant decrease e0 Qualifier30 and 60 kg ha-1 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.