Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When soil water potential continued to decrease, no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: SWP continued to be decreasede6
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: no longer obvious decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Yield and Quality of Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52

e2
“the yield of two cultivars was decreased significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558

e6
“but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637

Title

Effect of Soil Moisture on Yield and Quality of Rice

Zheng Gui 2006

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield did not decrease with increasing plant diversity.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment: increasing plant diversitye0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Maize yield did not decrease with increasing plant diversity.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–921

Title

Benefits of a maize–bean–weeds mixed cropping system in Urubamba Valley, Peruvian Andes

Ernesto Gianoli; Isaías Ramos; Armando Alfaro-Tapia; et al. International Journal of Pest Management 2006. doi:10.1080/09670870600796722

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation The main recorded maize pests were Diabrotica spp., Carpophilus sp. and Pagiocerus frontalis.
Intervention effect Overall pest abundance did not differ among crop diversity treatments.
Intervention effect Crop diversity significantly reduced maximum Carpophilus abundance.
Intervention effect Crop diversity significantly reduced maximum Pagiocerus abundance.
Observation The main beneficial arthropods were Paratriphleps sp., ladybirds and spiders.
Intervention effect Beneficial arthropod density did not differ among treatments.
Recommendation The authors recommend traditional intercropping as a valuable alternative to pesticides for resource-poor Andean farmers.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nei2you 6 yield did not decrease significantly under light water stress.

Material: Nei2you 6e0
Treatment: light water stresse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of Nei2you 6 did not decrease significantly under light water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–244

Title

Effects of soil moisture on the accumulation of rice dry matter and yield

Li Hua; Wang DongYin; Defeng Zhu Xi'nan nongye xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced Nei2you 6 yield by 15.2%.
Intervention effect Yield of Ⅱyou 7954 increased under soil water stress.
Observation Nei2you 6 was more sensitive to soil water stress than Ⅱyou 7954.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress decreased Nei2you 6 dry matter accumulation by 22.0%.
Intervention effect Light water stress increased Ⅱyou 7954 dry matter accumulation by 8.4%.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress increased Ⅱyou 7954 dry matter accumulation by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress lowered dry matter transmission to the panicle in Nei2you 6 relative to the check.
Intervention effect Soil water stress raised dry matter transmission to the panicle in Ⅱyou 7954 relative to the check.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light water stress did not significantly decrease Nei2you6 yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Nei2you6e0
Treatment: light water stresse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: didn't decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated that the yield of Nei2you6 didn't decrease significantly under light water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–304

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63

Title

Effects of soil moisture on superficial roots and yield of rice

Li Hua; Zhang Yu-ping Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2006

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced Nei2you6 yield by 15.2%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress increased yield of Ⅱyou7954.
Observation Nei2you6 was more sensitive to soil water stress than Ⅱyou7954.
Intervention effect Light water stress slightly promoted superficial root growth.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Nei2you6 by 10.5%~31.6%.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Ⅱyou7954 by 13%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress enhanced superficial root activity.
Intervention effect Root cutting at panicle initiation caused more yield reduction than at flowering.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at panicle initiation decreased grain number per panicle.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at flowering decreased spikelet fertility rate.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varsha had a 13% yield decrease.

Taxon: okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Material: Varshae0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 13%e0

Verbatim

e0
“the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241

t0
“okra”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37

Title

Morpho-physiological response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentum L.) genotypes to moisture stress during reproductive stage

R. M. Bhatt; N.K. Srinivasa Rao Indian Journal of Horticulture 2005

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Moisture stress reduced relative water content from 72–82% in irrigated plants to 66–75%.
Observation BO-1 had the maximum relative water content during stress.
Intervention effect Stress reduced leaf area across genotypes by 25–70%.
Observation Pusa Makhamali had the greatest reduction in photosynthesis under stress, followed by IIHR-1685 and Arka Anamika.
Observation BO-1 maintained photosynthesis at 11.5 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Varsha maintained photosynthesis at 9.7 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Arka Abhay maintained photosynthesis at 8.8 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Photosynthetic rate recovered significantly after stress release.
Intervention effect Further growth was considerably affected after stress release.
Intervention effect Moisture stress significantly decreased per-plant yield.
Observation IIHR-1685 had the greatest yield reduction.
Observation BO-1 had an 8% yield decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 could increase or decrease yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: PP333e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: increase or decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“PP333 applied could lead to plant height reduction, leaf smaller, yield increase or decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1168

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56

Title

Effect of culture factors on growth and yield of soybean II. Effect of fertilizer application, watering, growth regulate measures on yield

Wang Wen-xiu Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scieves 2003

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Seedling-stage fertilizer and watering promoted middle organ growth.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage fertilizer and watering increased upper organ growth.
Intervention effect Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers enhanced nutrient absorption in corresponding growth-centre organs.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased soybean nitrogen content.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased soybean phosphorus content.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased soybean potassium content.
Association Later fertilizer application tended to raise seed protein content.
Intervention effect Fertilization from initial flowering to 10 days later produced 15.6%～24.2% higher yield than the check.
Intervention effect PP333 reduced plant height.
Intervention effect PP333 made leaves smaller.
Intervention effect Huafu increased yield by 5.8%.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seasonal MPB totals produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: Higher seasonal totalse0
Outcome: lint yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391

t0
“Cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32

Title

Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate

Nathan B. O'Berry; Joel C. Faircloth; Michael A. Jones; et al. Agronomy Journal 2009. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0333

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect FM 960 BR July height fell 25% with MPB in South Carolina in 2006.
Intervention effect DP 444 BG/RR July height fell 12% with MPB.
Intervention effect DP 555 BG/RR July height fell 13% with MPB.
Observation Actual height reductions did not differ among cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced harvest height by 8 to 34%.
Intervention effect MPB reduced height-to-node ratio by 10 to 32%.
Intervention effect MPB enhanced maturity across cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced lint yield by 3.7 to 8.5%.
Association Earlier MPB initiation produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A concomitant decrease in autumn plant height may not affect autumn yield.

Taxon: AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome: autumn yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“A concomitant decrease in autumn plant height may not affect autumn yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1640

t0
“Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48

Title

Improving Winter Hardiness in Nondormant Alfalfa Germplasm

Mindy A. Weishaar; E. Charles Brummer; Jeffrey J. Volenec; et al. Crop Science 2005. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0060

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield.

Taxon: potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: liquid spraye3
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Alternative protection of potatoes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34

e3
“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518

Title

Alternative protection of potatoes in organic farming.

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BO-1 had an 8% yield decrease.

Taxon: okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Material: BO-1e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 8e0

Verbatim

e0
“the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241

t0
“okra”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37

Title

Morpho-physiological response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentum L.) genotypes to moisture stress during reproductive stage

R. M. Bhatt; N.K. Srinivasa Rao Indian Journal of Horticulture 2005

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Moisture stress reduced relative water content from 72–82% in irrigated plants to 66–75%.
Observation BO-1 had the maximum relative water content during stress.
Intervention effect Stress reduced leaf area across genotypes by 25–70%.
Observation Pusa Makhamali had the greatest reduction in photosynthesis under stress, followed by IIHR-1685 and Arka Anamika.
Observation BO-1 maintained photosynthesis at 11.5 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Varsha maintained photosynthesis at 9.7 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Arka Abhay maintained photosynthesis at 8.8 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Photosynthetic rate recovered significantly after stress release.
Intervention effect Further growth was considerably affected after stress release.
Intervention effect Moisture stress significantly decreased per-plant yield.
Observation IIHR-1685 had the greatest yield reduction.
Observation Varsha had a 13% yield decrease.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics