View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum soybean intercropping did not decrease sorghum forage yield versus monoculture.
Treatmentintercropping sorghum-soybean system e0 Outcomegraminae forage yield e0 Directiondid not provide a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The intercropping sorghum-soybean system did not provide a decrease in the graminae forage yield when compared to the monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1205 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated maize planting could extend to late December with 15 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease .
Directionwithout a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plough tillage before winter (II) showed only a tendency to a slight seed yield decrease of 4.8%.
Treatmentplough tillage before winter (II) e1 Qualifiera tendency to a slight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The effect of two factors: reduced tillage systems and foliar nutrition on soybean seed and straw yield in monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 e1 “a tendency to a slight yield decrease was observed only (4.8%) in the case of plough tillage before winter (II) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1407 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sucrose phosphorylase expression decrease d starch accumulation and tuber yield .
TreatmentExpression of sucrose phosphorylase e0 Outcomestarch accumulation and tuber yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Expression of sucrose phosphorylase led to: (i) a decrease in sucrose content, but no decrease in glucose or fructose; (ii) a decrease in both starch accumulation and tuber yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1089 t0 “potato tubers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Using soil survey instead of local soil data may decrease estimated Miscanthus yield by 1 t/ha.
Comparatorlocal soil data e5 SettingOxfordshire and North Yorkshire e6 Verbatim
t0 “UK biofuel supply from Miscanthus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 3–36 e5 “estimated yield may decrease by 1 t/ha, and its uncertainty may rise from 15 to >20%, when soil survey instead of local soil data are used. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1446 e6 “As shown for two counties (Oxfordshire and North Yorkshire) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1305 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
UN32 seemed to decrease lemon yield at the highest nitrogen rate in 1999.
Qualifierat the highest N rate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In 1999 where larger increments of N were applied over a smaller time period relative to the other seasons, UN32 seemed to decrease yield s at the highest N rate. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–876 t0 “lemons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield gain was more related to exchangeable aluminium decrease and calcium increase than to pH.
Outcomegrain yield increase e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “grain yield increase due to soil acidity correction was more related to the decrease in exchangeable AI3+ (R2 = 0.79**) and increase in Ca+ (R2 = 0.74**), than to pH (R2 = 0.52***). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3441–3622 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe drought significantly decrease d yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “siginificant decrease of the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1281 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Average yield loss was 769 ± 319 kg ha−1 for each unit decrease in leaf area index below the plateau.
Verbatim
e1 “significant linear decrease s in yield occurred in both full-season and double-crop soybean when leaf area index values were below 3.5–4.0 by developmental stages R4 to R5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1073 e3 “Average yield loss was 769 ± 319 kg ha−1 for each unit decrease in leaf area index below the plateau ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1250 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit decrease in flag leaf width factor corresponded to 2.06 unit higher yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Every 1 unit decrease in the flag leaf width factor had a 2.06 unit increase in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–992 t0 “Ideal type of rice core germplasm huanghuazhan and its derivatives with good grain quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.